You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Copernicus

Comments

What is that supposed to mean? Humans (made of atoms) and atoms have same level of intelligence?
October 15, 2025 at 05:50
what makes you think atoms are fundamental elements? They could be multiverses of something much smaller. I hope you're familiar with the infinite loo...
October 15, 2025 at 05:46
The elements at different scales.
October 15, 2025 at 05:23
Meaning they will show significant variance in terms of intelligence, hence the effect would be monumental, or should I say, astronomical.
October 15, 2025 at 04:39
Intelligence at the atomic level is much more versatile than quark levels, which is more versatile than energy levels, which is more than the spatial ...
October 15, 2025 at 04:34
Intelligence is subjective and influencable. My intelligence and yours aren't the same. But if two atoms or electrons showed different levels of cogni...
October 15, 2025 at 04:12
Yes, I know. But you said some argue otherwise. I responded to that. Simple cause-and-effect is dependent upon intelligence (cognitive due diligence)?...
October 15, 2025 at 03:06
That wouldn't make sense. What consciousness does a chunk of mud have? You mean sentience (reaction to stimulus)? Isn't that the argument of this post...
October 15, 2025 at 02:55
Interesting.
October 14, 2025 at 16:44
Alam, T. B. (2025). The Selective Universe: Order, Entropy, and the Philosophical Paradox of Natural Rigidity . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1734124...
October 14, 2025 at 16:21
Let Copernicus Post https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/%22Freedom_of_Speech%22_-_NARA_-_513536.jpg
October 14, 2025 at 16:16
less ironic than your defense, one would proclaim.
October 14, 2025 at 16:13
Do we have an undisputed definition for it, though?
October 14, 2025 at 15:48
Sure. Epitome of humanity lies in this site.
October 14, 2025 at 15:46
What I meant is that the same way the eyes themselves cannot see them, without external help, consciousness itself cannot interpret (look within) itse...
October 14, 2025 at 14:45
deliberate or a mistake in the coding?
October 14, 2025 at 14:39
What if I'm alone in a galaxy with no reflective substance to see myself?
October 14, 2025 at 14:38
I accidentally quoted myself and now can't find anything relevant to replace it with.
October 14, 2025 at 14:35
How do you delete a comment?
October 14, 2025 at 14:25
How do you delete a comment?
October 14, 2025 at 14:23
Did you (check what I responded to)? It's like: — Humans can't fly because they don't have wings. — Ever been in an airplane?
October 14, 2025 at 14:10
That's not even a logical argument. Read the metaphor.
October 14, 2025 at 13:44
I see. Or perhaps it can be framed as an argument from monistic perspective.
October 14, 2025 at 12:09
Because my papers are part of a series, and I've already defended monism in previous papers.
October 14, 2025 at 11:30
Time (not the flow of it) is the phenomenon of space and matter being driven (pushed forward involuntarily) by a mysterious force. I'd have to present...
October 14, 2025 at 10:33
Why do we need a state?
October 14, 2025 at 10:20
Nature isn't a hive mind. It has no central command. Nature itself is not an entity. Nature is the collective body of scattered elements. These elemen...
October 14, 2025 at 08:02
Because they're connected. Every element of the universe is an image of the universe itself. Elements project the universe, the universe projects its ...
October 14, 2025 at 06:16
you said there is no pure chaos. From that argument, the universe will never lose control. So I asked YOU on what you conclude as the fate of the cosm...
October 14, 2025 at 03:08
I asked, what does cosmology say about dualism?
October 14, 2025 at 02:06
are you saying the universe will forever last?
October 14, 2025 at 01:49
to see if the basis needs change.
October 14, 2025 at 01:49
Continue.
October 14, 2025 at 01:01
Take away all laws of physics or the natural order. That's true chaos.
October 14, 2025 at 00:55
Yes. You see if your synthetic being goes beyond its programmed capacity or scope and does something on its own that wasn't predicted (in machine lear...
October 14, 2025 at 00:54
Alam, T. B. (2025). The Selective Universe: Order, Entropy, and the Philosophical Paradox of Natural Rigidity . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1734124...
October 14, 2025 at 00:50
Well, you must have a basis for other arguments to circle around.
October 14, 2025 at 00:45
That's entropy. Any large-scale or permanent chaos would doom the universe.
October 14, 2025 at 00:43
Every element is crucial in its own place. But carbon was the building block of life and organic chemistry.
October 14, 2025 at 00:40
ummm.... Elementary biology and chemistry?
October 13, 2025 at 18:32
I think the main topic got sidelined here. Rather than dissection entropy, we should examine what makes carbon the heart of consciousness.
October 13, 2025 at 18:20
And what is your argument for that? So the universe (space) managing itself (entropy) for sustainability? Yes, my point too. But it does leave a quest...
October 13, 2025 at 17:14
So in true sense, nothing is unnatural or supernatural? That's what my thesis argues, though. So entropy is orderly? Isn't space part of the universe?...
October 13, 2025 at 16:59
cell is widely accepted as the precondition for living matter (i.e., those who have free will and mind). machines lack cells.
October 13, 2025 at 15:32
October 13, 2025 at 15:27
What is the definition of supernatural? If there is any "anomaly" to the natural law, is it unnatural? Does that make entropy or other chemical reacti...
October 13, 2025 at 15:24
It was never proved or observed. And one of the outcomes of consciousness is free will. But what is "will" exactly? A person in a coma or paralysis ha...
October 13, 2025 at 15:19
I think I've equated it with the eye's inability to see itself.
October 13, 2025 at 14:42
Will that cell generate consciousness?
October 13, 2025 at 13:31