Copernicus

You are pressing the switch in your sound, awaken mind. Reflexive actions are done biologically for your own good. They're self-serving. Your entirety...

Usefulness is practicality. If you're satisfied with practical benefits then sure. I'm not. I'm a theoretical person. To me, the truth is more importa...

Since when did categorical morality depend on intentions?

Your brain adapting to a pattern for your future convenience — self-interest. Just like I don't measure everything in the universe but know that (a+b)...

I think the moment you "learn" art is the moment it loses meaning. Philosophy, like any art, is about expression. Any intake is unnecessary. Just take...

Perhaps because there's in none.

Self-interest. Intent to assist others — agency — serving his own will and limbs to turn on the switch. He did it to both save himself from subconscio...

the definition is purely wrong, then, and those neologists need to be hanged.

We didn't have the technology. And no matter how many more billions of years you spend next, there will be things beyond your technical capabilities, ...

Social contract forces cooperation (and morality) without prior consent upon birth.

Sounds more like statecraft than philosophy to me.

what's your view on the social contract?

rhetorical. What makes you trust science? You say observations (testing, diagnosing, matching). Why trust observations? (P.S. don't forget to ping me)

Absolute certainty of infallibility?

I think the very word "morality" is a term with a collectivist (cultural or not) origin. Ethics, values, laws, and norms are all communitarian inventi...

Refinement of selfishness.

I didn't read the book. What's the story/context?

What gives observation more credibility than speculation?

People in 1000 BC couldn't see infrared. Was it fake? Humans and their inventions will forever be limited. And even if they were infallible beings wit...

What do you think of my definition for the term?

Minds that exist without a body (AI), do they suffer from mental health issues? Or is it an exclusive experience of the minds produced by a body?

Philosophy aside, do I now need to hire detectives or observers to know if my boiled egg is real or not?

Science and religion are both hypotheses, a leap of faith. There is no objective truth detectable by the subjective (individual or collective) observa...

If I'm getting this right, according to your theory, truth beyond observation (you need to observe to prove) is deniable, and anything showing uniform...

I said it from the mathematical standpoint. Nonetheless, are you sure your science is absolute?

Good one. There are more areas to attack, though. The problem with his proposition is that it's entirely mathematical.

Are they beyond the reach of the body (by-products)?

If the mind is a product of the body, why isn't its cure always found in the body, and often requires another mind? Is it because the mind acts as an ...

I agree with this. But what about something not observed yet, but is, beyond doubt, projected to happen? Will it be considered truth, or not because o...

I may not see my eyes, but I can feel their presence. What I meant is that the same way you can't scrutinize your eyes the way you can your palms, you...

Master of Law?

Comprehension is more important than authenticity. If AI helps me compose more correctly, why not?

not multiverse alone, but atoms as potential universes with profound and robust laws of nature. leaving room for argument on its sentience or intellig...

Alam, T. B. (2025). The Infinite Symmetry: On the Illusion of Scale and the Fallibility of Human Physics . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17357259

I'm a human being.

I'm more interested in arguments at the moment.

That's a bummer.

Intelligence is a higher order than consciousness. Every average Joe possesses sapience and consciousness. But not all of them work at SpaceX (analyti...

I hope you'd have counterarguments on your way back.

I've already stated that in the OP.

Intelligence gives birth to agency. Otherwise, we'd have to assume, according to your hypothesis, that non-living matters are paralyzed living creatur...

I didn't ask for a formal definition, but the fundamental idea that works as the baseline.

Basis of this accusation? Intelligence is the cognitive ability to understand and interpret. Do atoms have that?

Atoms don't have free will. They follow the principle of causality. Non-living things don’t have choice, but they do have obedience. Every atom, every...

That's just twisting facts.

That's not a definition.

that's not uniformity or identical behaviour.

You don't talk to me or touch me the same way you do with your wife, nor do you approach your wife in the same repetitive loop every day. But all hydr...

You miss out the important argument. If humans don't interact uniformly with other humans, why do atoms? They're not "small" in the absolute sense, on...

I don't believe in the fundamentality of anything, definitely not tangible matter.