Right, but hear me out a second. Please. I beg you. Think of it like this: consider the case of writing the numeral "3" or whatever, with pencil, on p...
By the way, if any Admins are reading this, I find it somewhat obnoxious that I can't use superscripts for the purpose of formatting the title of this...
So you think that there's an ontologically significant difference between space and time. Well, you're not wrong, since the former is 3D, and the latt...
Well, neither would I. That's my point. No one does. No one knows how to make Relativity (General & Special) compatible with Quantum Physics. I mean, ...
Well, think of it like this: to understand the Big Bang, you need to make General and Special Relativity compatible with Quantum Physics. How do you d...
You said you wanted to have an interesting conversation. So, answer the question: Is it possible to apply Einstein's formula to a single electron, yes...
@"flannel jesus" When playing a game of chess, are you in the habit of asking why a tower, being the representation of a human building, is able to mo...
Eh, I don't think that Rorty is a Pragmatist, that's the honest truth. I'm not saying that my interpretation of his philosophy is correct, I'm just sa...
@"fdrake" @"frank" You know what video game you should play (or re-play)? This one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Knight#Gabriel_Knight:_Sins_...
Why not? Which is a perfectly OK thing to say. It's a logical conjunction. This isn't rocket science, it's propositional logic, dude. It means that th...
Oh, and you expect me to do something about that? I already told you what it means, it means: Energy (potential & kinetic) = physical mass, defined as...
Comments