MoK

You cannot do proper philosophy without a good science and vice versa! Hume was false. He was an intelligent philosopher though. I am sure he would de...

So do you think that things like electrons, quarks, subconscious minds, conscious minds, etc. are real? Philosophy and science go hand in hand without...

Yes. Even the Mind requires physical otherwise It cannot experience anything therefore It cannot cause anything at all. What do you mean by "it" here?...

How could you judge my OP as a poor form of reasoning? Do you understand it? If yes we are on the same page. Otherwise, you cannot say that it is a po...

Yes, they are concepts but these concepts are based on extensive study of the brain. Why do you stick to the idea of perception when I already refute ...

I think that Hume did not understand the conscious mind and the subconscious mind. The conscious mind mostly perceives things but it is the main sourc...

The Mind, the subject of focus of this thread, is Omnipresent in spacetime as I argued in the OP. And yes, other minds are floating in space. They are...

Things cannot be mere perceptions since there are mental phenomena, thoughts for example, which are consistent. This consistency is because any though...

The mind is a substance that exists within spacetime. Please read my first, second, and third arguments for further illustration.

Did you read my responses to your objections in the first part of this thread? Yes or no? I am not talking about minds here but the Mind. I might open...

I am not talking about God here! Did you read my responses to your objections? If not there is no point in pursuing further!

Sure, I think that the synapses change all the time. The memory however is stored in a chunk of synapses so it is a collective thing. Any neural net h...

Did you read my responses to you in this thread!? What do you mean by "You NEED the argument to BE..."?

So, the synapses change accordingly to allow for memorizing things in time. Do you disagree that memorizing requires synapse plasticity?

I spend my time reading all your posts and my answers again. I think to be fair I answered all your objections. If you think otherwise, please go thro...

Where are your objections that I didn't answer? I did it. Please read the OP. I am not going to discuss God here since it is off-topic. I am done with...

Yes, time passes always, even if baseball does not change, since many other things are subject to change. Moreover, the baseball is on a location on E...

Show it to me.

We are going in a circle until people understand that the OP is correct!

Then, you need to tell me what you mean by identity. Although the brain looks the same at different moments in time, it changes constantly because the...

I didn't say that time causes physical to change. No. It is not correct. Time is required for any change. Consider a change in the state of something,...

So you are asking the big Why! It is not a matter of personal preference or taste. Bohmian interpretation is paradox-free so it is the correct interpr...

Cool, please only read the second argument, mate!

You cannot have a photograph of an electron. You can only see its trace that produces some effect in the environment like the screen in the above exam...

In regards to the OP, I don't need to discuss how the intrinsic properties of the physical are preserved. I also don't need to discuss the laws of nat...

You are something that exists within time and cannot experience time. Did you understand the relevance of my thought experiment?

Please see the section "Interference from individual particles" in this article if you want to see how a single electron can affect the screen produci...

The electron, quark, etc. are real. It is through physical investigations that we accumulate such a body of knowledge. Can you break a chair into elec...

Sure we need. No, looking at a chair just gives you an idea about what it looks like. Why don't you answer my question? We cannot go anywhere if you d...

We cannot ditch physics if we want to know what a physical, such as a chair, is made of. I didn't talk about electricity but your computer. So again d...

Sure it exists according to contemporary physics. Are you denying objective reality? Are you denying that the computer that you are using now does not...

It is accurate. No. The synapses only change when a new thing is memorized or learned. No, memory is only a feature of synapses. Well, without synapse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWRi7gDYjVY

The memories are stored in the synapses. Synapses are the junctions between nerve cells. They change when we memorize something new. What do you mean ...

No, I call the part of the brain where the main part of memories, long-time memories, is held as the subconscious mind.

I didn't deny that.

No, I don't need to describe all these items since a few of them are off-topic. We need to first agree on the OP. Off-topic. I will however answer tha...

Is this the only statement that you have a problem with? If yes, then I am not making nonsense over nonsense! Anyhow, consider a building with two ide...

Why don't read my comments and try to understand them? Did you understand what I said? If yes, then what is wrong with my comments? Saying that I am w...

All I am saying is that the Mind experiences the physical, let's call it P1, at time t1, and creates another physical, let's call it P2, at time t2 la...

I changed the OP accordingly to include your objections!

So you cannot? Can you?

Ok, I will add a couple of extra paragraphs to make things more clear. And thanks for your contribution.

How do you word it considering that you understand what I said so far?

Do you want me to include all these discussions in this thread in a single argument?

What is the thing that you do not understand? Did you understand everything I said? My theory as it is represented in the OP is valid.

They are not the same things.

I already elaborated on what I mean by the motion of the brain from one point to another point. That is all that matters. Haven't you ever elaborated ...

The electron only has the same intrinsic properties, such as mass, spin, and charge at time t1 and t2 but it has different extrinsic properties, such ...

Are we on the same page? :-)