Suffice to say you are wrong here and just repeating the incorrect descriptions. Abstaining from belief requires no knowledge. It is precisely a lack ...
No. THIS is the misunderstanding of the terms. An atheist merely abstains from belief. They do not assert that God does NOT exist. An agnostic believe...
I always take this to mean the person has assessed the claim for that God and rejevted it for lack of evidence - other Gods are next in line for asses...
I agree with this, as a Kantian definition. But I do think there must be an actual “something” from which our senses infer a consistent ratio of chang...
If you’re a Kantian or similar about time. Not everyone is. Beside this, time as a concept describes a pattern which actual does obtain among material...
1. Travelling to another point in time from the one you started from. 2. That precedes the rest so will leave aside. 3. Doesn’t matter. Time might not...
Along with your possible solution - I agree with the above and would posit that if that’s true, we are merely seeing the result of that randomness bei...
Ooof. A lot to unpack here. Suffice to say: I have attempted my life several times. But that has never been due to constant bullying which I have expe...
I have always assumed that since the two words are used separately and that they have separate etymologies that they would carry particular and differ...
Haven’t read comments but to OP: Agnostics believe we can’t know whether God exists. This doesn’t preclude faith. It’s just not justified true belief....
Yes/no but slightly confused. Yes to forgetting entirely and having a commensurate memory scheme installed for the new life to make sense - and yes If...
The brain-as-receiver or brain+consciousness=mind models would solve this as the changes are occurring in hardware/wetware receiving “mind” data from ...
I was waiting until after Xmas to reply to several responses but this one has drawn me in. It’s my knowledge of what constitutes a legal entity at pla...
Merry Christmas everyone! 6:37am here - and the kids have been up an hour Very much hoping everyone has a happy holidays and stops thinking for long e...
Oh, i readily accept that these things are either motivated by, or done in respect of, the contract/s in question. But the resulting obligation consis...
...because i believe it is true Is the best we've gotten, though. Im unsure you caught what i was trying to say. I agree with you, in principle, but t...
No. This needs to read "any record of it whatever, is destroyed" which is the case i made. I literally work in law firm dealing with solely mortgages....
Which words? You haven’t answered either: What makes the statement true; or Where your confidence comes from. Neither of your answers are in any way a...
Ok. My position is that this is another superfluous comment avoiding where you substantiate your confidence in the truth of moral statements. Im fine ...
If there is no record of your company existing, it doesn't exist. Fact. When the company office burned down, there were still plenty of records for th...
My understanding of this point is that, while we must infer something "in-itself" causes our phenomenal impressions, which in turn create our percepti...
That’s because they also exist in a register which is a physical thing also. But if the records are destroyed those things do not persist. They are th...
Oh. Ok. I cannot escape the thought that you are contradicting yourself. Let me shift the question: From where does your confidence in that claim come...
It's not, though. It's the case that a rule exists forbidding it. Not that one ought obey the rule. And in any case, the claim here would be "One ough...
After some more digging, it looks to me like the top total number is in flux, and trades off between Mandarin and English. Variously, there are 1.4-1....
Right right; i followed that element of the exchange; but I anticipate what i've pointed out may be a defense to your charge. If he's, unfortunately, ...
Fwiw, this is incoherent. The words have no coercive power. The threat of losing his/her job might. But that's not on the judge/s by the other comment...
Comments