You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

['Member']Joined: July 13, 2023 at 14:54Last active: February 03, 2026 at 20:117 discussions5585 comments
Location: United States

Bio

Here is a link to my introductory post.

Favourite Philosopher

Aristotle, Plato, Aquinas...

Favourite Quotations

"What the philosophers say about reality is often as deceptive as when you see a sign in a second-hand store that reads: Pressing Done Here. If you went in with your clothes to have them pressed you would be fooled; the sign is for sale."

-Søren Kierkegaard, Either/Or

---

"Words differently arranged have a different meaning, and meanings differently arranged have different effects."

-Blaise Pascal, Pensées

---

"Jeannine Carlier: You are not the first philosopher to have worked with his hands: Cleanthes was a porter, I believe. But a metalworker--what a symbol!

Pierre Hadot: This allowed me to learn at least one important thing. Until then, in my literary, philosophical, or theological essays, I had adjusted not metal but ideas. In this case, one can always manage, in one way or another. Concepts are easily malleable. But with matter, things became more serious. No more give, no more approximating, no more or less artificial arrangements. This does not mean that no rigor is possible in the works of the spirit, but it is very rare, and it is very easy to delude both oneself and others."

-Pierre Hadot, The Present Alone is Our Happiness, p. 14

---

Don't label him; say he's wrong. And don't just say he's wrong; say why. And don't just say why; say what you think is right.

-Paraphrase of Thomas Hopko

---

"Read more, write less."

Discussions (7)

Comments

A rather confused analysis. In fact what is happening in the U.S. and throughout Europe is the rise of forms of ethno-nationalism (similar to what is ...
January 02, 2026 at 05:19
I think good objections are being made to your positions. I realize I still have to reply to your post <here>, where you elaborate on this idea: For e...
December 24, 2025 at 05:46
That just means that he asked ChatGPT to do his homework for him, and it gave him that paper. The paper itself is not generated by ChatGPT.
December 24, 2025 at 05:23
Okay, gotcha. Even for prepubescent children? I'm not sure I agree even for adults. What are the specific "markers" you are thinking of? Okay. But wha...
December 24, 2025 at 05:20
I can draw this out if it's really necessary. My argument could be summarized as follows: L1. If something is "different from what is usual," then it ...
December 23, 2025 at 17:39
Why not? Again, in order to claim that a formal argument did not work, you must show that a premise or inference is incorrect. The only attempt you ma...
December 23, 2025 at 01:25
As I pointed out in my first post to you, the issue is that liberalism provides no grounds for the preservation of the realm (and your example of mart...
December 23, 2025 at 01:16
Right, and that's my point. I'm not sure how this fact can simply be smoothed over.
December 22, 2025 at 22:46
But if you are adhering to it, then what is wrong with the argument I provided you? Think about it, Amadeus. You claimed that humans are not special. ...
December 22, 2025 at 22:41
A very cogent post. :up:
December 22, 2025 at 22:36
The problem is that liberalism does not acknowledge the value of the preservation of the realm, and therefore what Finland did is not justifiable on l...
December 20, 2025 at 21:58
We are seeing political censorship trying to pass itself off as something legitimate. If someone argues against immigration they are called a "racist"...
December 20, 2025 at 21:46
Emphasis added to help provide clarity. And that identity is something like, "I identify as a woman, even though I am not a woman; and what this means...
December 20, 2025 at 19:50
You're welcome. Would it then follow on your view that the woman who uses a woman's bathroom because she looks like a woman rather than because she is...
December 19, 2025 at 21:59
I asked you for a definition of 'special' and you that definition. Did you give me a definition you do not accept? :yikes: (Just so you know, the leve...
December 19, 2025 at 20:54
That makes sense to me. Yeah, I think conservation of at least some things is something most people are interested in. Interesting. In some ways I thi...
December 19, 2025 at 20:42
Thanks. There is one thing I want to come back to: This specific understanding of moral naturalism is also something I am okay with, especially as per...
December 19, 2025 at 00:20
Okay, that makes sense. Sure. Okay, this does help. Let's revisit that initial formulation that you maintain is clear, "That I act is moral, but what ...
December 18, 2025 at 23:33
The contemporary thinker I personally follow most closely is Peter L. P. Simpson, who defends what he calls "ethical naturalism," but it's hard to spe...
December 18, 2025 at 22:17
And I'll believe you as soon as you replace "think" with "know" and "as a matter of belief" with "as a matter of knowledge," in that second sentence.
December 18, 2025 at 19:50
Let's look then: "The others work but I can't see how that makes us special." The argument is literally explaining to you, step by step, how it makes ...
December 18, 2025 at 19:35
Right, one could say that there is no problem because they are happy to be inconsistent, or incoherent, or to have double standards, or to be hypocrit...
December 18, 2025 at 19:29
You can't "simply disagree" when I give a formal argument using your own definition. You have to actually address the argument, and claim that a premi...
December 18, 2025 at 19:14
So the argument here... ...is that sexism involves an oppositionality between sexes or between genders. Or we could put it this way: Which sex or gend...
December 18, 2025 at 02:32
Okay, I agree. Okay, I understand your reasoning. Would you say that the elevating of sex over gender is sexism? Okay, I see what you are saying. That...
December 18, 2025 at 02:23
Another way to put this is to provide an exhaustive list of the possibilities: Sexism (based on sex): Favoring males over females Favoring females ove...
December 18, 2025 at 01:38
Okay, so: 1. Humans are the only species which "uses language, composes poetry, mathematizes the physical universe, develops vehicles to fly around wi...
December 18, 2025 at 01:29
Happy to help. :grin: Right. Regarding the term 'sexism', I think Merriam-Webster does well insofar as it does not deviate from those last three words...
December 18, 2025 at 01:22
This is pretty basic self-contradiction. "No one use of 'real' is more correct than another, even in the context of an argument, and yet we do need a ...
December 18, 2025 at 00:47
Right, and I would say that you and @"Hanover" are very close on these sorts of issues. You share all of the same premises but simply fall on a differ...
December 18, 2025 at 00:39
This is an interesting OP. I more or less agree that gender should not be elevated over sex, but I don't agree that this is sexism. Let's look at your...
December 18, 2025 at 00:29
Is it, though? I think you're just saying something like, "It would be really hard, therefore I lack the capacity." I think this is another invalid cl...
December 17, 2025 at 23:42
I think what you've already recognized nullifies this sort of argument: "Perhaps I need to change my behavior." What I've done is pointed to a kind of...
December 17, 2025 at 23:33
But that's not true, is it? You do have a capacity to learn Spanish, and you know it. Pretending you don't isn't to the point. If an infant is born de...
December 17, 2025 at 22:23
Yeah, I think it's a good observation. For example, if is constrained to maintain , "one ought not allow the strong to harm the weak," then it would s...
December 17, 2025 at 21:14
Your premise is invalid, "If an individual never ends up possessing X, then that individual did not have a potency for X." You have a potency to play ...
December 17, 2025 at 21:07
But what does talk of norms have to do with the thread, or my claims? Why are you suddenly talking about norms? Okay, that is helpful. It sounds like ...
December 17, 2025 at 20:47
Okay, but I think you need to actually revise your rhetoric if you really want to avoid coming off as "short." It's a bit like the person who says, "N...
December 17, 2025 at 20:30
That's true, but such a goal is a fool's errand. For example: The modern logician wants to say things like this while pretending that recognizing what...
December 17, 2025 at 19:56
- Here you go: Both of those quotes from you seem to imply that humans are special. Your definition seems to apply especially to humans, given the con...
December 17, 2025 at 08:58
:up: :fire:
December 17, 2025 at 08:35
And it's really interesting the way this intersects with your and @"J"'s interest in "the view from nowhere," because Sider is presupposing it. He thi...
December 17, 2025 at 08:21
You should try carving up a cow or a pig without any regard to the joints. No, it's not. Concepts are conveyed and understood via words. Any disagreem...
December 17, 2025 at 08:14
I think it's spot-on. When you go on to continue in the same vein it just reinforces my point. I don't think you've managed anything of the sort. What...
December 17, 2025 at 04:24
But you're just reiterating the error I've pointed to. I point out that humans are special and claim that babies are human. You concede that humans ar...
December 17, 2025 at 03:52
:up: Yes, and this critique can be drawn out in various ways. The question of whether a first-order quantifier quantifies over imaginary entities has ...
December 17, 2025 at 03:46
- Thanks, I thought it was a good conversation as well. :up:
December 17, 2025 at 03:41
Okay, and as long as you see the point of my objection I am content. If one ought not allow the strong to harm the weak then a consent-based morality ...
December 16, 2025 at 22:01
Well this whole thread revolves around forms of behavior that also influence others' behavior, so I don't think it makes much sense to try to make it ...
December 16, 2025 at 21:13
The deeper problem here is that you're just appealing to your Moorean meta-ethic where 'good' (or 'special') is undefinable and therefore, if admitted...
December 15, 2025 at 04:43