You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

Comments

Note that just as one can have a visual experience of an object without seeing an external object, so too one can have a visual experience of a colore...
September 08, 2024 at 18:24
There are cases where nothing will help. Again:
September 08, 2024 at 18:16
Okay good, and this is true even if their percepts are identical, yes? Therefore to see an external object is not merely a matter of percepts, yes?
September 08, 2024 at 18:15
@"Michael" So when the blind dream are they seeing? They are obviously interacting with percepts, and you think percepts are seeing, so apparently the...
September 08, 2024 at 18:05
You've claimed that the "hears" in "hears voices" is just like the "hears" in ordinary predications about hearing, which is false, because "hears voic...
September 08, 2024 at 18:01
But who is arguing that persons can hear without brains?
September 08, 2024 at 17:59
No, "hears voices" is a euphemism for "hallucinates." You are confusing yourself.
September 08, 2024 at 17:58
Does the "electrode" result in sight or a hallucination? (And why is this question important?)
September 08, 2024 at 17:57
Of everyone with a brain, there are some blind and deaf people who can be helped by aids to sight or hearing, and others who cannot. To understand the...
September 08, 2024 at 17:53
Yep. :up: It's odd that we even have to have these sorts of conversations.
September 08, 2024 at 17:44
This is equivocation on "seeing." For example, a blind person does not see when they dream, as your verbiage would have it. Sleeping pills are not a c...
September 08, 2024 at 17:40
Then do it. Defend either of those two claims. :roll: "To break the law is blasphemy." This is the sort of nonsense that most 10 year-old Christians o...
September 08, 2024 at 16:51
They are the priestly caste, and the priestly caste is always taken seriously both by others and by themselves, in part because their function within ...
September 08, 2024 at 00:58
Feel free to defend either of these two claims. The second claim is more truly <It was considered blasphemy to claim to be the messiah>.
September 08, 2024 at 00:11
- You are making things up left and right, and I see no reason to reply to such bizarre and unsubstantiated ideas.
September 07, 2024 at 22:37
- Yes, I very much like the way you set this out. A contradictory word and a contradictory intention/meaning are two different things, and a capable t...
September 07, 2024 at 22:21
Sure, but this is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Psychiatry could be the Devil himself, but even so the whole system would collapse without...
September 07, 2024 at 00:32
- What exactly are you disputing? This?: Mental illness is surely a problem, no? And how do we approach it? Psychologically, sociologically, medicinal...
September 06, 2024 at 23:47
Outlander answered this for me privately. My Stylebot settings were hiding the option. :blush:
September 06, 2024 at 23:11
Yes, and I find the roots of this in Aristotle as well. Whereabouts in Spinoza could this be found?
September 06, 2024 at 22:41
I suppose my point is that social approaches to mental health need not be conspiracy theories. Describing social theories with the example of, "worldw...
September 06, 2024 at 19:49
Founders of that tradition such as Alfred Adler would have a more nuanced take. I think many people recognize that mental health cannot merely be redu...
September 06, 2024 at 19:00
You asked about slaves without masters and masters without slaves. If a master is not isolated from slaves then he is not without slaves, and vice ver...
September 06, 2024 at 18:12
- Probably the most basic evidence for Jesus' claim to divinity is the fact that the Jewish authorities arranged to have him executed for blasphemy.* ...
September 06, 2024 at 17:57
Two quick questions. 1. Is there a way to delete private messages? If there is, then encouraging people to delete their obsolete PMs would free up som...
September 06, 2024 at 15:54
A lot of it is on point for me, even though he is going deeper than I have seen others go. It is also bringing together a number of disparate interest...
September 06, 2024 at 00:20
In 's thread on Irad Kimhi some of the same issues that were present in this thread are coming up again. For example: This thread quickly turned into ...
September 05, 2024 at 22:26
Reading more of Kimhi's book, I am appreciating it, especially the way he explodes the Fregean paradigm over and over. I think Kimhi could help clear ...
September 05, 2024 at 18:51
Before looking at affirmation and negation I want to revisit this part of the OP now that I have a better understanding of the context. Colloquially, ...
September 05, 2024 at 06:32
Informative review. :up:
September 05, 2024 at 03:16
I see you are back to your schtick of non-responses. I will take this as a concession, and move on with the topic of the thread.
September 05, 2024 at 00:45
Okay, I grant that it is a beginning. My point is that formal considerations cannot answer the OP. "There are no true sentences that are not about som...
September 04, 2024 at 15:18
*mispost*
September 04, 2024 at 14:45
- What I find in the U.S. is that Protestantism tends to be narrow minded, and those that reject this tradition desire to be broad minded, in much the...
September 04, 2024 at 04:06
- Good luck!
September 04, 2024 at 01:05
Have you now reduced a historical question to an exegetical question? The number of ex-Protestants in this thread is not coincidental. Of course he di...
September 03, 2024 at 21:52
And your statement seems to have nothing at all to do with it. So again I ask, What does this have to do with the topic at hand?
September 03, 2024 at 21:40
And the one who actually reads the OP notices sentences like this one: The one with a predetermined interpretation has to ignore sentences like that o...
September 03, 2024 at 21:36
The one who is engaged in the attempt to formulate and justify rules is not engaged in mere rule-following. This false charge is common. No, it is an ...
September 03, 2024 at 18:12
Good, we are in agreement on this. I think Aristotle's answer to both would be, "Poorly." If humans are social animals, then flourishing will require ...
September 03, 2024 at 18:08
Thanks, . :up:
September 03, 2024 at 17:58
How would this be an answer to the OP? The question we are considering is whether all true sentences are formulable within formalism, and it seems a f...
September 03, 2024 at 16:59
This strikes me as an important truth, and one that is missed on TPF (and in analytic philosophy generally). Granted, I do see a measure of separabili...
September 03, 2024 at 16:45
Yes, I agree. These strike me as good points and good philosophizing. Perhaps, but there are probably more contemporary and focused treatments of the ...
September 02, 2024 at 21:56
Moral principles are part of moral deliberation, and thinking to them and through them is part of ethics. Else, you fall into caricatures and strawmen...
September 02, 2024 at 21:26
Right. Sure, I agree. Hah, I like that quote. I have a love-hate relationship with analytic philosophy. I was trained at an analytic school that stron...
September 01, 2024 at 20:51
You leave out the other thing that Plato and Aristotle knew: thinking through ethical questions aids us in arriving at good judgment. No one has ever ...
September 01, 2024 at 18:26
Right, and when I tried to bridge your thread with the thread discussing whether we see colors or only our perceptions of colors I ran into this same ...
September 01, 2024 at 18:24
You did say that, but you obviously didn't follow through on your word. Remind yourself that not two hours later you showed yourself untrue by continu...
September 01, 2024 at 15:48
I am of the opinion that Banno at least somewhat derailed your thread on QV by immediately shifting it away from Sider's ontological realism and towar...
September 01, 2024 at 04:27