You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

Comments

Yes, that's a good point. Your emphasis on weighting different parts of the canon is edifying and intuitive. I was aware that such is a traditional He...
July 29, 2025 at 03:55
- I think you're reading a lot of things between the lines that aren't there at all. For example: Where does Barron claim that power supersedes truth ...
July 29, 2025 at 03:03
True, and that seems to be one of the elephants in the room. I wonder if any within this thread would say that wokeness never got off the rails?
July 29, 2025 at 02:43
I want to say that causality is not physical because causality is a principle and principles are not physical. Or else negatively, because that which ...
July 29, 2025 at 02:35
Another problem is that many of the woke claim that everything is just a power game, a jockeying for power. The wokeness of such a person is apparentl...
July 29, 2025 at 01:26
The Philosophical Roots of Wokeism with Bishop Robert Barron
July 28, 2025 at 22:46
The cause is in question because this is a thread about causality. We are not talking about ?-temperature. We are talking about causality. So to talk ...
July 28, 2025 at 22:27
- Good. I mostly think they couldn't. They might not use the word "energy," but the words they would use would mean the same thing as energy. But ener...
July 28, 2025 at 22:17
There are a lot of assumptions here, but let's take a step back. You are saying, "?-temperature caused the water to freeze." So even if we grant for t...
July 28, 2025 at 22:11
Well look at your own examples. Are you claiming that a temperature reduction is physical? Or that corrosion is physical? Or taking my own examples, a...
July 28, 2025 at 21:59
I agree, and I still find the article I mentioned here useful: - Interesting. I don't really disagree with any of that, but I want to say that the pro...
July 28, 2025 at 21:01
Right. :up: I tried to delve into this sort of issue in fdrake's thread. I'm not really convinced an overly rational account of what wokeism is reacti...
July 28, 2025 at 20:47
I think this is a central point, and I would just say that causation is not physical. I am surprised to see that there are a lot of claims within this...
July 28, 2025 at 20:32
Well, there was no "anti-woke crowd" before wokeness, and wokeness ironically created much of the sentiment that it claimed to oppose, such as racism....
July 28, 2025 at 20:15
This is an interesting and thoughtful essay. :up: I wonder if you would be willing to provide a rough bibliography for your ideas?
July 28, 2025 at 18:22
Elaborating on this a bit, the coercion engaged by woke culture and the left in general has to do with manipulation of the Overton window. The natural...
July 28, 2025 at 18:12
You are conflating better simpliciter with better qua art. Someone who desires art will hold that what is more artistic is better than what is less ar...
July 28, 2025 at 17:36
- Excellent OP. :up:
July 28, 2025 at 15:44
- Great post. :up:
July 28, 2025 at 15:38
- Yes, I think that's right. :up:
July 28, 2025 at 05:27
Hmm, okay. But isn't it curious that in R I said "better (or more artistic)," and in your own posts you recognize that some art is more artistic? Usua...
July 28, 2025 at 05:23
I think that hones in on the political sophistry or equivocation involved, which I pointed to in my . It is this: when one talks about "gun control," ...
July 28, 2025 at 05:05
Okay, that's a reasonable answer. Would it then follow that if we have a prepared food that is not art, and then someone adds salt to make it taste be...
July 28, 2025 at 04:45
Okay, well it is promising that we both at least hold to P and Q. :up: I worry that this isn't a real attempt at a definition, on account of the possi...
July 28, 2025 at 02:46
I definitely agree. It's also worth thinking about the way in which "morality from on high" is doomed from the start. For example, suppose the beliefs...
July 28, 2025 at 01:45
But aren't Aristotle's four causes attempting to answer questions such as, "Why a duck?" The explanation for a duck will presumably include why it is ...
July 28, 2025 at 01:32
Doesn't causation just explain the "why" of some event or substance? We usually think in terms of efficient causation, in which one is identifying the...
July 27, 2025 at 20:42
Good points, and I think that if we want to look at the foundations of what is happening with wokeness we will find that it stems from a morally robus...
July 27, 2025 at 18:43
Egalitarian-relativism is actually somewhat common on TPF. @"J" often promotes it in the field of epistemology, and recently gave an unanswered argume...
July 27, 2025 at 04:54
If art is meant for aesthetic experience or aesthetic encounter, then the modulation of one's mood is beside the telos of art. So if someone says, "I ...
July 27, 2025 at 04:00
Just noticed that this article was published the same day as your OP: Teleology: What Is It Good For?, by John O'Callaghan
July 26, 2025 at 23:52
Okay, good. That is the sort of claim I was wondering about, and it relates to my "caveat" above. I can definitely see merit in such a claim, and if t...
July 26, 2025 at 22:58
Sure, and that seems uncontroversial. But is that which is structured by affective realities durable? Are affectively grounded systems ever more than ...
July 26, 2025 at 22:55
- Yes, that's fair. Government subsidies and large scale "agribusiness" have changed things a bit.
July 26, 2025 at 21:15
- I agree in large part, but note that 's whole argument revolves around a homicide chart, and 's whole argument revolves around a statistic about dea...
July 26, 2025 at 18:44
Do you know many farmers? In my experience I don't think that they are quick to adopt new technologies. They are open to the idea, but tend to move sl...
July 26, 2025 at 18:41
Great posts and thoughts. What would you say to the objection which says that wokeness is a transitory phenomenon? That given its affective character ...
July 26, 2025 at 18:36
I think there is an even simpler explanation available. It is that agricultural work is inherently conservative. It relies on stability, predictable p...
July 26, 2025 at 17:09
I think you are placing too much faith in contextless statistics and relying on implausible premises such as this: On an individualistic and historica...
July 26, 2025 at 16:43
Spoken like someone who is adamantly opposed to argument. I.e., like Banno.
July 26, 2025 at 16:28
At least in our very contingent historical moment. But when an argument is based in a very contingent historical moment, it tends to lack depth. After...
July 26, 2025 at 04:44
It may be worth pointing out that recognizing that art is an end in itself does answer this current question of "use", but it does not provide the ess...
July 26, 2025 at 04:30
Psychosis? Madness? Pathology? I would appreciate it if the mods would consider the way that Banno consistently responds with unapologetic bigotry and...
July 26, 2025 at 02:03
Yes, but this is a very individualistic assessment. It's a bit like saying, "The class which is most likely to die in gun-related incidents is police ...
July 26, 2025 at 01:53
No, I was thinking of offering a reductio ad absurdum against the argument, but it looks as though you agree that killing with indirect intention is n...
July 26, 2025 at 01:33
But do you understand your own arguments here? Again and again you are saying, "The coercion is justified." You are free to make such arguments, but t...
July 26, 2025 at 01:00
It's the simple fact that the head of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is doing stuff like that. Obviously Rogan has nothing to fear. "...provi...
July 26, 2025 at 00:01
Although it's hard to see the water you swim in, the freedom of the press in Australia is not great. For example, that Kim Williams, the chair of the ...
July 25, 2025 at 23:44
:up:
July 25, 2025 at 23:37
I think this is the conclusion of the arguments he is proposing: What is at stake in the arguments is justice, not the compatibility of canonical text...
July 25, 2025 at 22:30