You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

flannel jesus

Comments

ah I didn't realise you were including language issues in that. The way you phrased the question made it sound like you thought there was a difference...
July 22, 2025 at 13:23
This one is rather trivial. Of course someone with that knowledge could in principle learn anything about the book someone who physically had the book...
July 22, 2025 at 12:15
I think he wants debates within panpsychism. Which is valid. "If we start with the assumption that pansychism is true, where does that lead us?" I thi...
July 22, 2025 at 09:29
are you the guy who listened to the Annika Harris audio thing with me?
July 22, 2025 at 09:09
there's a big difference between not having convinced anyone at all, and not having convinced you in particular
July 11, 2025 at 18:54
maybe there are lawless universes. And if there are, interesting stuff doesn't happen there and there aren't conscious beings there to wonder why it's...
July 04, 2025 at 16:53
that seems like an assumption, not a fact
June 01, 2025 at 09:37
Disappointing opening paragraph. Why does it "cease to exist"? Just because some person isn't perceiving it, that means it "ceases to exist"? Hmmm... ...
June 01, 2025 at 08:55
Nah, it has to involve belief. It's not "knowledge" unless someone knows it, there's already a word for truth without belief and that's called "fact".
May 31, 2025 at 20:17
Novelty is relative. As long as you couldn't predict it, it's novel - and you can't predict reality perfectly no matter how deterministic it is. You c...
May 31, 2025 at 15:52
You put those words in quotes as if I literally said them, but I didn't say them. Order. In a deterministic system, every event has its place in the s...
May 31, 2025 at 07:36
I think a surprising amount of physics is based on abstract, apparently-subjective judgements of physicists. What would be a beautiful way for the wor...
May 30, 2025 at 14:10
there are multiple deterministic interpretations of qm too so we can keep the beauty of determinism anyway.
May 30, 2025 at 12:22
Because it's beautiful (in a mathematical sense). There's something hideous about random spontaneous things with no ontological explanation just poppi...
May 30, 2025 at 06:56
to me, the most disappointing part of the audiobook is her reason for cutting her conversation with Sean Carroll short. It seemed like she was saying ...
May 27, 2025 at 10:34
she says herself that she's a physicalist multiple times in the audio book. She also says it here. https://open.spotify.com/episode/4uUFfDc8HYTsdbTeng...
May 26, 2025 at 18:01
"emergence" is merely a category of explanation, not an explanation in itself. The other category is "it's fundamental" - and some physicalists like A...
May 26, 2025 at 06:58
glad you liked it. I thought it was thought provoking but lacking in actual arguments. I did buy it for the thought provocation though, so it did its ...
May 25, 2025 at 19:54
that's what rejecting democracy means...
May 24, 2025 at 19:21
it's only as much a performative contradiction as someone who is anti violence using violence to protect themselves from other violence, it seems to m...
May 24, 2025 at 19:03
In a free nation, long posts without paragraph breaks shouldn't be allowed
May 20, 2025 at 20:35
right, with the Copenhagen interpretation the indeterminism comes AFTER the deterministic Schrödinger equation. The Schrödinger equation deterministic...
May 17, 2025 at 17:22
there's not a "possible interpretation". It's an equation that is by definition deterministic. Indeterminism in various interpretations of quantum mec...
May 17, 2025 at 17:13
this conservation isn't about if its true. You expressed confusion about why people think many worlds is deterministic. Regardless of if it's true or ...
May 17, 2025 at 17:09
In many worlds you can - what happens is all of it. That's why many worlds is deterministic. It takes the output of a deterministic function and says ...
May 17, 2025 at 16:44
my bad, someone claimed that? People are just chopping off their willies to look like Allen Rickman in Dogma?
May 17, 2025 at 16:02
a deterministic function is a function that gives the same output given the same input. The Schrödinger equation outputs probability clouds of configu...
May 17, 2025 at 15:49
what is "it"? The "it" that you understand isn't deterministic.
May 17, 2025 at 15:10
I don't think it is. I think it's just fine that one of us is me and one of us is you, and I don't think it makes sense to ask "why am I me and not yo...
May 17, 2025 at 14:38
Idk what exactly you mean by "standard", but it should be noted that that kind of surgery is actually on the rare side.
May 17, 2025 at 08:44
Yeah Well of course they'd take it, but they can't spend their lives just daydreaming about a miracle
May 17, 2025 at 06:33
and how would someone detect that difference? How could WE detect that difference? How do you know this isn't our second time through these lives, and...
May 16, 2025 at 19:11
Are you sure that's the answer? Doesn't that pre suppose that you have some kind of pre-existent identity with which to flip heads? The universe in wh...
May 16, 2025 at 17:33
That's an indexical problem. The answer to that is not a problem for many worlds, it's a problem for ANY multi-consciouness existence, even if many wo...
May 16, 2025 at 16:43
we're not talking about if many worlds is true or not, just what the consequences of it would be and why it's considered deterministic. Right? You can...
May 16, 2025 at 09:13
I have no idea what you're trying to say with this. You asked me how many worlds is deterministic, I tried to give you a visualization to help you see...
May 16, 2025 at 09:02
If I had a computer program where you press a button, and it rolls a dice, and you see a random number between 1 and 6 afterward, that would be indete...
May 16, 2025 at 08:20
That's the same as asking "why am I me and not you?" What do you think of that question?
May 16, 2025 at 06:11
I wasn't making a statement about our universe, you asked me for a scenario in which something would be true. It's a hypothetical to answer your quest...
May 16, 2025 at 06:06
someone with a chronic illness may spend a lot of their time envying people with health, may spend hours each day in maladaptive daydreams imagining t...
May 16, 2025 at 06:04
Without looking into the deep deep library of philosophical writings, I would say "want" is something kinda passive, and "will" is when you have a wan...
May 15, 2025 at 21:35
yeah maybe it's particularly rare to entirely destroy the want just through will. Doesn't mean you can't want not to want something, can't will not to...
May 15, 2025 at 20:28
you started with "seems to me that's not willing not to want the addiction". I don't think I agree with that opening sentence. You are willing not to ...
May 15, 2025 at 19:58
choosing them over the other want, to the point that you.. maybe... want to destroy the want? And then act to destroy the want? And then sometimes suc...
May 15, 2025 at 19:47
The universe we live in happens to evolve deterministically, but there's no particular reason for, say, the physical constants or the starting conditi...
May 15, 2025 at 14:05
Yes Because ironically, in the many worlds there's a single state of affairs in the end with a complete explanation. "Single state of affairs? In many...
May 15, 2025 at 14:01
My current view is, PSR -> determinism But not the other way around necessarily But neither the PSR nor determinism are necessarily true.
May 15, 2025 at 13:04
I guess I can't get over the idea that it seems fundamentally reasonable to ask "but why this result in particular?" Electron can be spin up or spin d...
May 15, 2025 at 12:56
interesting
May 15, 2025 at 07:04
the singular nature of the end result. I want to know why one thing happened, if your explanation doesn't tell me exactly why this one thing happened,...
May 13, 2025 at 20:15