You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

plaque flag

Comments

I'd say that the concepts of time and space are one thing, but that moving my arm around of seeing an object in experiential space is another thing. I...
October 11, 2023 at 16:23
Your tone has sometimes been, from my POV, too much on preachy / condescending side. I view us as doing something like science here. When you bash Wit...
October 11, 2023 at 16:08
I was being a little abrupt. Sorry about that.
October 11, 2023 at 16:03
Here is Kant at (in my view) his most phenomenological and empiricist. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/4280/pg4280-images.html#chap78 This 'good'...
October 11, 2023 at 15:54
I add some crucial passages from the TLP. https://www.wittgensteinproject.org/w/index.php?title=Tractatus_Logico-Philosophicus_(English)#5 A highlight...
October 11, 2023 at 14:41
You may be surprised like I was to see how much the brain already figures in Descartes, and therefore, presumably, in Kant. http://www.classicallibrar...
October 11, 2023 at 14:27
:up:
October 11, 2023 at 04:03
I wouldn't be surprised if the East had it first, tho I'd check the Christian mystics for a premodern grasp? FWIW, I think what Wittgenstein was getti...
October 11, 2023 at 03:54
I tend to blame a sort of hitchhiking bad metaphysics rather than science itself. Good clean science just creatively postulates and confirms patterns ...
October 11, 2023 at 03:46
Let me clarify. 'Looking right through' is genuine practical achievement, even while being an ontological disaster. I mean we literally train to ignor...
October 11, 2023 at 03:39
I tend to agree, but there's a reason I avoid the word 'consciousness.' I really think the way to go here is a kind of monism. It's not that conscious...
October 11, 2023 at 03:33
:up: This is in line with my view, and J S Mill's and Berkeley's, I think. Objects 'are' possible and actual experiences.
October 11, 2023 at 03:30
I hear you, but for me there's no sharp boundary. My own phenomenology-inspired view rejects the idea that reality is hidden somehow 'outside' of a so...
October 11, 2023 at 03:28
When I read (for instance) Husserl's Ideas II (which is thought to have inspired Heidegger in a pretty direct way), it made me remember the way I unde...
October 11, 2023 at 03:16
I think this is solved with J S Mill's permanent possibilities of perception. It's a semantic twist, really. The point is that what we mean by the exi...
October 11, 2023 at 03:08
Well I think my own view (and Husserl's) is very close to a certain side of Kant --- that part in the CPR where he writes about beings on the moon. Bu...
October 11, 2023 at 03:03
Typo. Meant to write 'tend.'
October 11, 2023 at 02:49
All of our 'experience' of the world features it surrounding our sentient flesh. But we tend to look right through our own looking. Russell writes of ...
October 11, 2023 at 02:45
What I mean by such realism (the kind I reject) is the postulation of 'aperspectival stuff' being primary in some sense, existing in contrast to ( and...
October 11, 2023 at 00:28
I do understand what you are getting at. I think it's a reasonable concern. We already know, using our reasoning, that some animals have better or dif...
October 11, 2023 at 00:16
I understand the temptation to say there may be completely unknowable dimensions of objects, but I'm asking what kind of meaning can be given to such ...
October 11, 2023 at 00:06
That may apply to some objections to Kant, but it's very much beside the point here. I've explicitly challenged scientific realism, embraced correlati...
October 10, 2023 at 23:57
I don't think you are seeing the issue. Kant's radicality makes the brain itself a mere piece of appearance, not to be trusted. He saws off the branch...
October 10, 2023 at 23:55
If you follow me and understand 'mind' as just the being of the world, then maybe I'll agree with you, for I think space and time are as real as anyth...
October 10, 2023 at 23:49
I'll add a quote from Husserl too, because I think it's the 'temporal horizon' of objects that tempts us to project something that hides behind them. ...
October 10, 2023 at 23:48
I hope you all find this quote from Sartre, basically the opening of Being and Nothingness, relevant (tho maybe all will have a different use or react...
October 10, 2023 at 23:40
My point is perhaps best understood as semantic. Let P be claim that objects exist as more than their possible adumbrations (in a wide metaphorical se...
October 10, 2023 at 23:35
This is not a philosophical way of doing business. I think for now we should take a break in the conversation. But no hard feelings. I just think it'l...
October 10, 2023 at 12:17
I'm not the one who denies time. Indeed, I'm insisted that being is time in some sense. I write of 'interpenetrating worldstreamings.' In this context...
October 10, 2023 at 11:46
Not disagreeing, but Why ? Note that 'fundamental' is a metaphor that gestures to the ground, the soil, that upon which everything stands, typically u...
October 10, 2023 at 11:39
We only have fragments to go on, and of course we don't take (at least I don't take) any jaw-flapping human for an authority, but there's this: This w...
October 10, 2023 at 11:36
I claim that we can only talk sensibly about something at least possibly experienceable by us. I'm saying connected to our experience, not fully and f...
October 10, 2023 at 09:27
That sounds right to me, tho I don't claim to be an expert on such matters. I do think life is noisy, muddy, and wobbly, even if we can smooth it over...
October 10, 2023 at 00:14
I don't go out of my way to meditate, but I can report of my happy and at-ease states, which are fortunately pretty regular, that there's a leaping fr...
October 10, 2023 at 00:12
:up: That sounds right. I like Rahula's What The Buddha Taught, and I imagine the state you describe as the goal. This is a kind of auto-affection or ...
October 10, 2023 at 00:02
I've looked into that book recently. Of course Heidegger is famously eccentric in his grasp of Nietzsche, but there is something to be said for even a...
October 09, 2023 at 23:54
Oh I love those symbols too, because they speak to and for me. I think in those symbols. I truly love epsilontics. My understanding is that Weierstras...
October 09, 2023 at 23:49
I think the most charitable way to read it is as gazing on The Unchanging with adoration. Or feeling oneself in a sort of divine stasis, having tempor...
October 09, 2023 at 23:40
:up:
October 09, 2023 at 23:38
How so ? To be sure, I'm using a fairly concrete analogy there (taken from L) , but I embrace the existence of all kinds of mental entities, mathemati...
October 09, 2023 at 23:36
You raise a good point. I can't endorse all of his claims, but some of them are great. I recommend checking out 5.6 and its leaves, which largely insp...
October 09, 2023 at 23:28
A question that might be asked is whether this is true by definition --- whether we tend to understand 'Being' precisely in terms of constant presence...
October 09, 2023 at 23:22
I know that there are aspects of Nietzsche that hard to enjoy, but I definitely personally defend his overall philosophical greatness. To be clear, it...
October 09, 2023 at 23:17
Not to be difficult, but claiming that all metaphysical questions are undecidable seems to decide an important metaphysical question. Though I can act...
October 09, 2023 at 23:14
I'm glad someone caught my little joke. I feel you. Did you ever look into the famous TLP ? It's got a tree structure, where you can open up any claim...
October 09, 2023 at 23:08
One more quote that I think/hope you will relate to: ... if the only form of tradition, of handing down, consisted in following the ways of the immedi...
October 09, 2023 at 21:10
I guess I find the discursive and 'the rest' to be pretty entangled. But I've been known to talk about the feeling of being 'behind language.' Or mayb...
October 09, 2023 at 21:03
:up: Beautiful. Yeah I think we are on the same page in the most important way. The feeling tone, the sense of philosophy's radical potential, the sen...
October 09, 2023 at 20:53
:up: I suspect that this : Indra's net (also called Indra's jewels or Indra's pearls, Sanskrit Indraj?la, Chinese: ????) is a metaphor used to illustr...
October 09, 2023 at 20:52
I'm going to add a supplement to the OP here. I think (?) the 'transcendence' of the object in phenomenology is little known and yet important. The re...
October 09, 2023 at 20:46