You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ludwig V

Comments

:up: :up: There are two things about philosophy that are not quite polite to mention. But they are important, nonetheless. Answers are not the point, ...
February 13, 2023 at 12:05
I agree about the full belly. However, having started another career which would have provided considerable comfort as well as a full belly, I had to ...
February 12, 2023 at 11:10
How very pragmatic of you. :smile:
February 11, 2023 at 21:36
What this high-lights is that we rely on a whole heap of assumptions in deciding what is true, or may be true, or isn’t true. But when we are reminded...
February 11, 2023 at 21:32
I've posted a starting-point with the title "Vogel's paradox of knowledge"
February 11, 2023 at 14:34
It seems that there is something of a consensus here. What I was getting at it that Wittgenstein doesn't say "Here is scepticism. This is my solution....
February 11, 2023 at 13:53
Thanks. I'll check it out.
February 10, 2023 at 20:34
My memory may be fallible, but I'm not sure W directly confronts the sceptic. He certainly thinks that many of the philosophical questions that he doe...
February 10, 2023 at 20:33
I have thought about this. I would like to start a new discussion for it. If we start what I have in mind on this thread, things will get confusing fo...
February 10, 2023 at 19:48
So what is your solution?
February 10, 2023 at 19:46
I've no problem with exploration. But I'm also cautious enough to find about as much as I can about what I'm getting into, and a clear idea of what I'...
February 10, 2023 at 19:42
We seem to have two quite distinct threads running through this thread. Never mind. I get quite worried about Wittgenstein's hints that there are thin...
February 09, 2023 at 10:46
OK. But it will take me a while to get things together.
February 09, 2023 at 10:28
Thanks for that link. It's nearly as good as Christmas. But I was thinking that perhaps it was time I read it again, so it is well timed.
February 09, 2023 at 10:13
Hah! I may be somewhat up to date about Gettier. About nearly everything else, I'm hopelessly out of date and scrambling to catch up. Although many th...
February 09, 2023 at 10:10
[reply="ucarr;779591" Oh, I think that all of those ways of coping are flawed. I'm often reminded of the painting "Landscape with fall of Icarus". It ...
February 09, 2023 at 09:57
Oops! We seem to have a crossed wire. I don't think that Gettier found a major flaw in theory of knowledge, but I did get interested in how Gettier cr...
February 09, 2023 at 09:47
:smile: :up:
February 08, 2023 at 18:14
There's no doubt that coping with all the information available demands some sort of strategy or mechanism. Skepticism is not the only possibility. Ho...
February 08, 2023 at 18:12
Thank you for that collection. Typical, isn't it? He mentions a metaphor and passes on, as if it was transparent. Then elsewhere, you find another met...
February 08, 2023 at 17:59
Your distinction between Knowledge and knowledge reminds me also that what can be known depends on the conceptual framework within which it is known. ...
February 08, 2023 at 11:37
I agree that our discussion is getting rather confused. Perhaps we've gone as far as we need to. I agree with you that . Getter problems are all narra...
February 08, 2023 at 11:14
There’s a book or two to be found in these contributions. Forgive me if I don’t reply in detail. For what it’s worth, I’m very taken with Wittgenstein...
February 08, 2023 at 11:05
I’m not quite sure what the context is of your argument. But I do find that context is always important and it’s true that general epistemology, like ...
February 07, 2023 at 15:55
In my book, they certainly are failed and attempts at knowledge, so that’s fine. It is also true that my tipster believes that his horse will win. So ...
February 07, 2023 at 15:51
One of the most interesting features of the modern world, to my mind, is the interpenetration of the great traditions of the world. Western science se...
February 07, 2023 at 15:47
I disagree. Having a justification does not automatically promote a belief to knowledge. In particular, if the justification fails, we call the result...
February 06, 2023 at 12:24
I did a Ph.D. in philosophy, taught philosophy at degree level for a long time, ended up in edmin (education administration), and finally jumped into ...
February 06, 2023 at 12:10
I agree with you that scepticism about the value of deduction is not unreasonable and that human beings are fallible. Ever since Plato got hypnotised ...
February 05, 2023 at 08:58
We have to acknowledge that human beings are fallible and that we are human beings. But we are not always wrong, and it seems to me that the point of ...
February 04, 2023 at 10:43
I take it that a premiss is shaky if it is less than conclusively true and/or it is less than conclusive evidence for the conclusion? That implies tha...
February 03, 2023 at 21:31
There's something odd happening here. What you say is correct. Did I ever say anything to suggest that I thought something different?
February 03, 2023 at 21:13
So we agree! :smile: It follows that Smith’s belief that he is justified is not sufficient; we also have to accept that he is justified. In other word...
February 03, 2023 at 09:29
There might be all sorts of reasons for liking or disliking an example, but the most important criterion in our context is whether the example is clea...
February 03, 2023 at 09:21
If Smith’s belief is justified and true but not knowledge, then the JTB needs revision. If Smith’s belief isn’t justified, then the JTB has no problem...
February 02, 2023 at 16:41
I’m not unfamiliar with Quine and Davidson, but completely unfamiliar with this part of their output, though I've heard of Quine's "web of beliefs", w...
January 31, 2023 at 19:03
That is certainly true. Russell’s stopped clock is similar. It is an example devised by Bertrand Russell in Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits as a...
January 31, 2023 at 18:38
AGENT SMITH You are right, of course. But there are complications when you include belief, knowledge and justification in the scenario. Within this sc...
January 29, 2023 at 10:33
I disagree with it as well. I was specifying a belief that I think Gettier’s practice shows that he holds. Yes, it does hark back to atomic propositio...
January 28, 2023 at 14:00
In the case of deductively conclusive justification, I basically agree with you, with some qualifications, which probably don’t matter. I agree with y...
January 28, 2023 at 13:48
Well, that clarifies a great deal, and I agree that this dissolves the Gettier problem. But I do have qualifications. First, is this a diagnosis that ...
January 10, 2023 at 11:46
Thanks for your reply. There's no deadline for this. Whenever you are ready. I'm glad we have got the farmer sorted out. I look forward to your help w...
January 03, 2023 at 08:30
I apologize for my silence. Life has been rather busy and pre-occupied for the last couple of weeks. You may have lost interest by now, but just in ca...
January 02, 2023 at 19:18
I'm not sure that it is quality that matters most to me. There's a lot of very different kinds of stuff going on, but that allows me to be selective. ...
December 22, 2022 at 11:09
In principle, this is just taking the computer analogy seriously, and I wouldn't argue that that analogy is not useful. In the case of the machines, i...
December 20, 2022 at 10:22
That's all certainly true. I remember seeing quoted from Hacker. According to him, a description of an experience will be of a tickle, a twinge, a pai...
December 19, 2022 at 16:26
I'm sorry I have taken so long to respond to your posts. I am distracted by the approach of Christmas with all that entails and my time for philosophy...
December 19, 2022 at 10:31
We've got into a very complex and difficult debate. It isn't just a matter of empirical research, but of interpretation of the results and the princip...
December 18, 2022 at 05:30
Have you never seen a dog or a horse tentatively sniffing at something? For me, that often amounts to asking the question whether the something is edi...
December 17, 2022 at 21:48
Thanks for that. Very interesting. I like the piece about AI working out what penguins believe. Being only a philosopher, I can't resist commenting th...
December 16, 2022 at 12:53