You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Hanover

Comments

You should have known something was amiss just from the grammar. Hebrew doesn't have a third person objective perspective (the depersonalized "thou," ...
November 04, 2025 at 16:48
The use of prior decisions does not require blind adherence to unnuanced rules, but it allows the opposite, where each prior decision can be considere...
November 04, 2025 at 13:56
It's common that we document prior decisions and use those decisions to form future opinions. It's the basis of Talmudic law and anglo-saxon based leg...
November 04, 2025 at 13:52
You're arguing self evidency or something. I really don't follow this. It's bad to kick puppies and if anyone disagrees it means they're a bad person ...
November 04, 2025 at 04:48
If I say the sun ought shine because the sun does shine, that's the is/ought fallacy If I say the sun ought shine because the book of morals says it o...
November 04, 2025 at 04:43
I have provided answers to your questions. Maybe not satisfying to you, but nevertheless responses. My reference to the moral elites was to point out ...
November 04, 2025 at 04:38
No, it's not. The naturalistic fallacy is to claim the world is X so it ought be X. I'm saying the morality which governs is Y, so if the world doesn'...
November 04, 2025 at 03:46
I feel my questions go unanswered.
November 04, 2025 at 03:37
Not created by people. That leaves God, the Big Bang, or the emergent laws of nature, but not by us.
November 04, 2025 at 03:34
I don't know. It's your theory. I am arguing morality is discovered, not created. But my questions remain: Why can't a law be more moral than a moral ...
November 04, 2025 at 03:31
No, if morality arises from something other than the morally elite properly weighing the varying goods of others, it maintains that distinction, namel...
November 04, 2025 at 03:10
My thoughts on this is that you seem to bevcollapsing the distinction between morality and law. We accept the latter is arrived at by social negotiati...
November 04, 2025 at 01:24
That's pure subjectivism. If I get to decide and you get to decide then we're the definers of the good. The problem is that plenty of bad people do de...
November 03, 2025 at 21:19
You should find someone to eat it with.
November 03, 2025 at 16:46
You agree with natural right theorists that rights exist?
November 03, 2025 at 16:45
Do you not take anti-realism to be assigning the good to social construction? But I don't mean to put words in your mouth. Why is the Trumpian express...
November 03, 2025 at 14:06
If there is no referent for "good," then you're arguing anti-realism.
November 02, 2025 at 22:42
Vaccine avoidance isn't typically based upon religious objection, but upon a misunderstanding of science. That is, they think they are being scientifi...
November 02, 2025 at 21:42
I am. You'll have objectively measurable results to determine if you've met your subjective goals, which would not necessarily mean accepting truths (...
November 02, 2025 at 20:08
You're whetting my appetite for more. Get it, wetting. I'll be here all night.
November 02, 2025 at 14:21
The Euthyphro dilemma. "Socrates asks whether the gods love the pious because it is the pious, or whether the pious is pious only because it is loved ...
November 02, 2025 at 14:12
It's an ancient piece of art hanging on the wall, subject to interpretation. I see the availability of a holy cleansing always present regardless of h...
November 02, 2025 at 06:09
A fable saddens you, thinking of all the people who couldn't board the ark, but relieved to know the horses, iguanas, frogs, and polar bears made it. ...
November 02, 2025 at 05:59
The deluge not as destruction, but as spiritual rebirth, a purification, a 40 day mikvah immersion, a baptism if you will.
November 02, 2025 at 02:32
It's the basis for all social decisions we make. Why do we pass some laws and not others? Why do we build some buildings and not others? Your asking h...
November 02, 2025 at 00:44
His books were not generally banned due to concerns about limited literacy. They were officially and specifically banned for all readers because they ...
November 02, 2025 at 00:12
Maimonides attempted to offer a philosophicaly rational basis for specific religious revealed beliefs centuries earlier. Descartes' required a rationa...
November 01, 2025 at 20:41
You can't acknowledge an exception and say "always." The best you can say is "mostly , " but then you'll have to start counting. Maybe we can say "som...
November 01, 2025 at 19:40
Theistic (and deistic) bases exist as do secular ones. Human rights can exist without God and can transcend government. The question is of moral reali...
November 01, 2025 at 16:03
Rights are not granted by institutions. Institutions are obligated to protect rights you already have.. Rights are an inherent part of being human. Wh...
November 01, 2025 at 13:46
Yeah, that's not at all how Mill seperated the higher and lower pleasures. It had nothing (as in zero) to do with epistemic methods. Moral concern was...
October 31, 2025 at 21:39
On Passover, we would slaughter a lamb and pour its blood on the door so that Yahweh would pass over the homes of the Jews and only kill the Egyptian ...
October 31, 2025 at 17:48
More nostalgia for you. When I was probably 6 or 7, I would walk up to the gas station and convenience store about a mile from my house and buy candy....
October 31, 2025 at 17:17
I lost my key a long time ago and keep my garage door unlocked. It's been unlocked for years. Sometimes, like if a repair person needs to come over an...
October 31, 2025 at 16:54
When I was a kid, you'd drive up to the gas station and drive over this air hose and it would make a ding sound and a guy would run out to your car to...
October 31, 2025 at 14:33
In American it's called a windshield.
October 31, 2025 at 13:34
I think the more generic the better, which would suggest "belief" be substituted for "religion," and then theism just being a specific example of reli...
October 31, 2025 at 03:08
Yes. Theism is not of the same category as science. The latter is but an empirical gathering tool, occasionally at odds with religious claims. The for...
October 31, 2025 at 02:31
So atheism is no belief, just an empty set? Assuming that's a correct bit of psychoanalysis, how does it change what I said? A belief is not to be mea...
October 31, 2025 at 02:27
Theism is to be judged as a form of life, not as a proposition with a true value.
October 30, 2025 at 23:52
It's possible that the better part of the life of the theist isn't spent fretting over the epistemological differences between scientism and the vario...
October 30, 2025 at 23:48
Amazon is my theological library.
October 29, 2025 at 21:10
I live at the foothills of Mt. Everest and I'm going to level that fucker with a shovel. That is true faith. Belief in yourself.
October 29, 2025 at 21:09
Good memory. Actually I don't know what caused me to buy the Buber book, but maybe it was implanted long ago by you. Have you read it?
October 29, 2025 at 21:04
A guy at work just handed me The Crisis of Narration by Byung-Chul Han. It looks like the sort of shit @"Baden" might read.
October 29, 2025 at 19:10
"Faith will move mountains if you bring a shovel." Hanover 1:1. That's the Jewish one, and a Jewish guy just said it.
October 29, 2025 at 19:06
Two Types of Faith by Martin Buber. He describes the difference between the Christian concept of faith and the Jewish one. The topic of "what is faith...
October 29, 2025 at 18:47
My point was that your position is not tenable, evidenced by the fact that it is not held by anyone who has critically looked at the matter. It's just...
October 29, 2025 at 14:13
Ok. But I never disputed the distinction between bots and people. People have souls (or "being alive and mindful" if that's your preferred phrase). I ...
October 29, 2025 at 12:58
There are plenty of reasons not to engage a bot even if the bot fully passed the Turing test. Which major philosopher holds to the position that every...
October 29, 2025 at 12:36