Jackson

We are done.

So, you have nothing. Good day.

Where does Hegel call himself an idealist in the Phenomenology?

Physicalism is a metaphysics. But they like to think it is not.

If you have an argument make it.

Wiki is for beginners. I am no beginner.

Hegel was not a political activist. Most political philosophers do not want to be activists. Marx was different.

Hegel never denied the reality of physical life and did not think reality was the ideal or conceptual. Marx wrongly defined Hegel as a idealist.

I know Aristotle. He never called himself a mathematician. Unless you want to say he was a biologist, physicist, literary critic, historian, philosoph...

Which is different from dialectic.

Aristotle was not analyzing math.

Aristotle initiated the study of logic. Aristotle was not a mathematician.

Last time. You really don't know what "nation" means?

You asked what "nation" means.

For Aristotle dialectic was the pursuit of truth and rhetoric is the art of persuasion. They are opposites.

Really, you don't know what a nation is?

I have no idea what that means.

...philosophy.

What exactly is wrong?

Math and logic are not the same thing. Ethics is not politics; politics is about nations. Aesthetics is the philosophy of art; there is no discipline ...

Not external.

I did not say it was.

Which I do not agree with. No need to repeat this debate.

The program is the process.

The way the brain functions. It's a finite object.

Ok, same as AI.

Just as humans cannot fly, teleport, or calculate the distance to the moon by looking at it. Programmed.

Why not?

If AI is part of the evolution of the universe then it can understood as part of nature.

Why does a machine have to be conscious?

A priori means before experience, or a condition of experience.

Priests are condemning of Protestants.

I never heard of a church believing that.

Same to you.

Both, for Kant.

Intelligent Design is religion.

First, I never read links. Second, I do not see how my comment led to you talking about biology.

I do not think we know what human intelligence is. So, AI is as good a form of intelligence and any other. AI is not trying to imitate the human mind.

No idea what that means.

Fuck Kant. I think he is a dope. And I read the Critique of Pure Reason entirely in grad school.

No, but I think AI will be a different kind of thinking and not merely computing.

Yes. A trained artist literally sees colors other do not. They can, but is a learned skill.

Agree.

He says in What is it like to be a bat: Therefore the analogical form of the English expression "what it is like" is misleading. It does not mean "wha...

Long story.... Hegel defined ancient greek metaphysics as natural consciousness and modern (Christian) as self consciousness. I think he is correct. R...

Why must it be that way for Reason?

Seems rude.

Sorry, I don't follow. The designations of inner and outer do not seem correct.

I see red. I don't feel myself seeing red.

Again, do not agree. My point is that "inner aspect" is vague or incoherent. Nagel's point is that a human can know what is like to be a human but not...