You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

lll

Comments

I know Hume's problem, etc. Science is just the least worst thing we seem to have. It makes us fail better. Let's let our theories do our dying for us...
March 19, 2022 at 23:54
We then to get our chews stunk in the mud.
March 19, 2022 at 23:54
At some point the rubber meets the road (experiments are done) or it's just theology or poetry. No doubt there's a 'formal' side to any mathematical s...
March 19, 2022 at 23:51
Thanks! <salute>
March 19, 2022 at 23:45
I get that. I've always understood it as your own invention, a brew or a stew or superscientific postreligious goo, and I like the taste of my poetry ...
March 19, 2022 at 23:43
One of my versions of that is the smell of 'garbage juice' which the trucks leave behind in the early morning. How ineffable that spell ! Feuerbach st...
March 19, 2022 at 23:35
Beautiful quote ! Reminds me of Dostoevsky and Sartre. Also of this: This is the knotty child who questions Everything with that most terrible of ques...
March 19, 2022 at 23:30
I agree, and yet insist that qualia are alogical, elusive, paradoxical. So we must talk of objects. Bridges dropped on ballerinas is beautiful, the se...
March 19, 2022 at 23:25
Geniuses can be superstitious or wrong. All it takes is a moment of innovation against the usual background of conformity and confusion.
March 19, 2022 at 23:22
Theology is itself the god it seeks, I might metaphorically suggest. But, granting the poetic license of intending at least to further decorate a conc...
March 19, 2022 at 23:20
Turning the crank of tautology detector won't get you what you want. I happen to be trained in math, and it's the discipline in which one never knows ...
March 19, 2022 at 23:18
I don't accept his 'proof,' and I'm trying to emphasize the absurdity of getting from symbols dancing on a page metamagically to your bag ditty gad fr...
March 19, 2022 at 23:09
In the USA, I don't see the silencing of theists or really any kind of supernatural theorists. You can even believe that extraterrestrial reptiles who...
March 19, 2022 at 23:02
So, putting it bluntly, do you go from Gödel's 'proof' to a religion with specific content? Does your God prohibit incest ? (Asking for a friend.) If ...
March 19, 2022 at 22:57
Yes. Well put. Some want the hole in the donut without the dough.
March 19, 2022 at 22:55
I'm saying that most folks want a personal god who cares about them and that the gods cooked up by logicians and metaphysicians tend to be uselessly a...
March 19, 2022 at 22:48
Nice quote !
March 19, 2022 at 22:46
Nice!
March 19, 2022 at 22:43
A problem with your Göd above, neglecting the question machinery with which he it is lowered upon the world state, is its abominable blankness and bla...
March 19, 2022 at 22:41
Love the quote!
March 19, 2022 at 22:28
Thesis a chew sorry. (This is a true story. ) We are chew chew drains. A chew place bikini. The moral of the story is oral. There is chew munch spoke ...
March 19, 2022 at 22:20
<smile>
March 19, 2022 at 22:17
This sounds like a variety of deism. The philosophical problem, which I don't think you've address, is the trust you put in the word 'mind' to do so m...
March 19, 2022 at 22:14
There's plenty of that to be had, but there's also presentation of a fragile absolute. If the ego or subject has been revealed as a tired and tangled ...
March 19, 2022 at 22:07
This recognition (correct or not) of brute fact or pure contingency seems to be 'the mystical' for young Wittgenstein and 'the nausea' for young Sartr...
March 19, 2022 at 22:02
That limited applicability is due to the model 'not noticing' or 'accounting for' the bending of space by mass (it's been awhile, perhaps a physicist ...
March 19, 2022 at 21:54
Reminds me of Nietzsche's vision of all the life-hating old men and their blasphemies against the river that ever runs over (life.) On the flip there'...
March 19, 2022 at 21:49
As I see it, nonconformity is only ever partial if it's at all intelligible. I agree with Rorty and others that metaphors are mad, essentially sensele...
March 19, 2022 at 20:52
No big deal, but I think the logic is flowing backwards here. You try to derive the synchronization of action in the world from the synchronization of...
March 19, 2022 at 20:31
It is a big question indeed. You mention necessary beings, and I think we crave (at times anyway) an escape from contingency and pragmatic conjectures...
March 19, 2022 at 20:24
Look up a bit and see the issue with Mercury, which helped support Einstein against Newton.
March 19, 2022 at 20:16
Respectfully, to challenge a popular anthropomorphic prejudice, for one thing. Experienced drivers can concentrate on high-level strategic decisions (...
March 19, 2022 at 20:14
Oh we love love our fantasies. I'm mostly with Blake and Vico myself. We secrete the reel world chew gather, poetically. We undergo self help noses, e...
March 19, 2022 at 20:07
I don't think you are quite following me, though you make some good related points with which I agree. Try to imagine the so-called unity of individua...
March 19, 2022 at 19:59
Intriguing. I am attached (at least on this forum) to that which gives itself at least partially to language. I am inclined to respect the revelatory ...
March 19, 2022 at 19:51
It's as if you can visualize only one dialectical opponent, whose lance is ever the accusation that what you're doing isn't science. To this rude ride...
March 19, 2022 at 19:48
Agreed. Is there something sociopathic-shamanic about the philosopher? A controlled touch of madness? 'Fringe' sounds right on it. I was thinking not ...
March 19, 2022 at 19:39
Ah, I was probably riding my hobby horse and thinking about qualia. Thanks for clarifying.
March 19, 2022 at 09:37
I think you know that Newton (Kant's inspiration, I think) was wrong, and that science deals in tentative hypotheses and models that work well enough ...
March 19, 2022 at 09:35
I very much agree that we ought beware. I take one of the big insights of 20th century philosophy to be 'watch out for the metaphors (pictures) that q...
March 19, 2022 at 09:26
Damn, you're a sweetheart! I truly appreciate the encouragement.
March 19, 2022 at 09:20
I suppose, I suppose. Though perhaps we are simple in one way to be all the more complex in another.
March 19, 2022 at 09:11
Dirt cheap. Easy to grok. Two parameters. Sum up millions of points with a couple of 64 bit floating point numbers. You can do a sine wave model with ...
March 19, 2022 at 09:07
Well put, friend! Glad we're sing high to high.
March 19, 2022 at 09:01
Both! The shine says wet point! (I'm working lately at an experimental prose style that is dense with suggestiveness. For the most part, it's carefull...
March 19, 2022 at 09:01
As I understand it, it's logically possible that a theory keeps on working indefinitely as we crank up the 'resolution' of our measurements. The point...
March 19, 2022 at 08:55
That's sort of what I mean by 'mound' and 'mutter.' This has 'mind'/'mound' contaminated with stuffishness and 'matter'/'mutter' contaminated with lan...
March 19, 2022 at 08:36
. Indeed! Except I'm just as happy to 'deconstruct' the 'thing-in-itself' or 'noumena' or any proposed essence of the 'physical.'
March 19, 2022 at 08:35
Now you just need to show me a correlation, except that one side of that correlation is...private and impossible to show by definition. Do you see it ...
March 19, 2022 at 08:29
Without a single data point? You assume that similarity of biology implies similarity of 'private experience.'
March 19, 2022 at 08:27