You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

frank

Comments

I'm thinking you saw Pinocchio as a child and said, "This is inconceivable!"
January 13, 2023 at 10:30
Among the many accounts of gravity on the table is that our gravity is bleeding into our universe from another bigger one. Some scientists noticed tha...
January 13, 2023 at 05:38
How do you know that? Chalmers has a couple of thought experiments that show that the two are logically distinct. One is the p-zombie. This shows that...
January 12, 2023 at 23:47
And you take this to show that phenomenal consciousness is equivalent to biological states? Could you explain how? Because I'm not seeing it.
January 12, 2023 at 22:57
This may be, but you'd need to provide evidence for it. It's not a logical truth.
January 12, 2023 at 21:32
In: Bannings  — view comment
Oh shut up.
January 12, 2023 at 20:26
Yes, but Chalmers hasn't opined on what science should do, has he? Just on what it would have to do to address the hard problem.
January 12, 2023 at 20:07
Chalmers doesn't think that science, in it's present state, is capable of addressing the hard problem. He thinks it will probably take some sort of pa...
January 12, 2023 at 19:43
In: Bannings  — view comment
:grin:
January 12, 2023 at 19:37
I'm not looking to do a deep dive on what Isaac thinks because I'd probably bump my head on the bottom of the pool. But he said: The last sentence is ...
January 12, 2023 at 19:36
In: Bannings  — view comment
Oh shut up.
January 12, 2023 at 19:30
Regardless, your view is similar to his.
January 12, 2023 at 17:56
In: Bannings  — view comment
I thought you were off grid somewhere in France.
January 12, 2023 at 17:25
In: Bannings  — view comment
Not me. I'm always a frickin genius!
January 12, 2023 at 16:16
In: Bannings  — view comment
Olivier was a little high strung (much like you). He would completely flip out sometimes, especially in private conversations.
January 12, 2023 at 15:55
What do you think generates that kind of movement?
January 12, 2023 at 15:20
It's a collection of essays and excerpts published by Oxford.
January 12, 2023 at 11:59
I think you're broadly in agreement with Chalmers here.
January 12, 2023 at 11:57
Yes. This is metaphysical possibility. We can have a god do whatever we want as long as it's not a contradiction. The test is for conceivability, that...
January 12, 2023 at 01:12
How so?
January 12, 2023 at 00:49
There's no doubt that experience and neural activity go hand in hand. It could be that neural and other CNS materials give rise to experience. We don'...
January 12, 2023 at 00:44
This was your understanding: I see where these speculations are coming from, but the hard problem is more basic. It's: why do you experience orgasms? ...
January 12, 2023 at 00:20
So if you aren't sure what the hard problem is, why would you vouch for someone else's understanding? I don't understand.
January 12, 2023 at 00:11
From what you've said so far, I don't think you do. It's just a call a theory of consciousness that includes an explanation for phenomenal consciousne...
January 12, 2023 at 00:06
I don't think it's an ontological argument. It's just that functionalists will have to prove that there's nothing more to phenomenal consciousness tha...
January 11, 2023 at 22:56
What things don't share the same world? I don't know what you mean.
January 11, 2023 at 21:22
Does it? Remember that when gravity was first introduced into physics as a thing to be explained, no one imagined that it's a matter of curved space. ...
January 11, 2023 at 21:02
I was just saying this same thing. Worldview comes into play in the assumptions people make about it.
January 11, 2023 at 20:43
This is my theory: we have a worldview that says individual humans possess qualities like creativity, initiative, depression, joy, etc. This developed...
January 11, 2023 at 19:39
And then it's interesting to compare Frankish's thinking to that of Penrose: https://youtu.be/3WXTX0IUaOg
January 11, 2023 at 15:52
In case anybody's interested in illusionism: https://youtu.be/c_69Ros8epE
January 11, 2023 at 14:55
In: Bannings  — view comment
Oh, shut up.
January 10, 2023 at 22:55
It was worse. I've gotta good book recommendation if you're interested.
January 10, 2023 at 22:53
In: Bannings  — view comment
He can be a toad sometimes. He does know a lot about hazardous waste, tho.
January 10, 2023 at 20:55
In: Bannings  — view comment
I can't believe you said that about Tclark! :fire:
January 10, 2023 at 19:43
Yep.
January 10, 2023 at 19:41
So he's saying there is a magic show or illusion, but it's missing something that would make it qualify as phenomenal consciousness. I think Dennett d...
January 10, 2023 at 19:41
Depends on what kind of blindness they have. The GCS is a quick way to communicate clinical signs. It's not a definition of anything. There might be r...
January 10, 2023 at 18:24
You're pretty well versed on the topic, what would you say is the best argument against the hard problem?
January 10, 2023 at 15:54
No frogs were harmed.
January 10, 2023 at 14:50
Well, yes.
January 09, 2023 at 23:15
I don't know if that would be a logical error. I'm guessing the strong bias towards believing that we're all the same has to do with communication. Ap...
January 09, 2023 at 23:08
I see. :smile:
January 09, 2023 at 21:40
Right, but it takes one to know one.
January 09, 2023 at 21:36
I see. How did you come to be awakened?
January 09, 2023 at 21:33
Interfaith is a progressive form of religion where the differences between Christianity (including all it's sects), Judaism, and Islam are downplayed ...
January 09, 2023 at 21:20
Are you into interfaith?
January 09, 2023 at 21:08
Plus they don't have hemoglobin. They have hemocyanin.
January 09, 2023 at 17:08
Uh huh.
January 09, 2023 at 13:56
Really? Care to justify that statement?
January 09, 2023 at 13:52