S

Apparently whether or not something is philosophically interesting is entirely a matter of StreetlightX's opinion, so you're asking the wrong person.

That's a terrible idea! (Now everyone will think that it's a good idea).

Great idea, only this time we've switched roles, with you being ironic and me being sincere. (Oh wait, that was @"Baden". Whatever, you're all the sam...

I can see it being interesting like a puzzle. Making an argument riddled with fallacies is like mixing up the colours of a Rubik's cube and then placi...

:rofl:

Do do do-do-do

Fallacy of trying to be wittier than me.

I doubt that. :grin: (I'm setting you up, here. Go ahead and say it).

What happened to the minimalism that was mentioned earlier? That's too much, and it's just kind of a needless replica of the resources section, and if...

That you doubt that anyone would read it, and therefore think that it’s a waste of space, is countered by my lack of such doubt, which leads me to con...

Yeah, let's pin it where it won't be seen by most people. Great idea.

It wouldn't endorse the bad use - at least not explicitly. That would be an unintended consequence, and I agree that it would be bad. That's why, of c...

He also got in a few subtle digs, and acted as though he's superior. The irony is that he sees it in others, and disapproves, but apparently doesn't s...

Yeah, let's read emotional things into it and name call and sling mud and make it personal. That kind of stuff is so much more reasonable.

Alright, alright! I'll catch up first, then reply to whatever you're referring to. :grin:

Need I remind you that the British people wanted Brexit, which you strongly disagree with, a significant enough number of the American people wanted T...

:roll:

Do it! That's better than nothing, at least.

It's hopeless. The site staff will band together and keep coming up with reasons to reject it, no matter what you say. I should know better than most:...

:shade:

How did @"Janus" word it? Ah, that's it: "egregious projection".

At least you seem to have moved on from much of your illogic to focus on trivial semantics. That's progress of a sort, I suppose. Let's just agree to ...

Agree. No, because that erroneously rules out speaking unconfirmed truths. If I knew enough to make a prediction or a guess about the properties of bl...

What? A square is a shape that has four equal sides and four equal angles. So if there's a shape that has four equal sides and four equal angles, then...

:lol: :up:

Finally, some criticism worth taking on board. I knew it would come from someone like you. That's possible. Though I think that we could counteract th...

It's one more item, and it would be very helpful and relevant. I get the minimalism, but it doesn't have to be so extreme that one more pinned item is...

That's all pretty obvious. It's additional claims and where you take this which could be problematic. Phrases like "has to do with", "looking at", and...

Things in nature have a centre of mass, and that's objective. It doesn't even seem to make sense to say that things in nature have a morality. Objecti...

That's not evidence in support of your claims where there is disagreement. We know that most people value their lives, so Bob will probably choose the...

Asserting the disjunction itself would be to assert an "is" statement. It says that it is true that either A is true or B is true. And unless both A a...

Oh man, that one's a classic. It has been a while since I've seen it, so I just laughed really hard.

:smirk:

So there's no good reason not to do this? People are maybe just fucking with me: let's vote "Disagree" just to mess with him! Okay, very funny, guys. ...

Ah, I see what you're doing. This is "payback". I made fun of your diagram by purposefully acting as though I had grossly misunderstood it, and you're...

Nope, not by my logic, plain and simple. By your logic, plain and simple. Your logic is bad logic which I reject. This is one of your fundamental erro...

I wouldn't say that last part. That it has the property of being 450nm and 630THz means that it's blue.

Wait, I think I get it. Morality is a badly drawn cone?

That we're all sort of restricted to the word is not a bad thing. You can do more complex things with words. You'd just be reinventing the wheel, mean...

Have you ever heard the idiom, "reinventing the wheel"? Maybe that one could be symbolised with a hammer in combination with a wheel. (Or maybe we cou...

This is insane. It serves only as an example of very bad logic: a test for someone to analyse, identify the errors, and write up an explanation. Besid...

I feel like I must be a little mad to keep this up for so long. Maybe for even trying to begin with, knowing what it would be like. Oh well. Fuck it. ...

Colour is visible light. Different colours are different ranges of wavelengths.

Thank God. Perhaps hearing it from someone else will help.

Ooh, that's a toughie. You. Your fake conversation between us misrepresents what I'd say. Straight away, I wouldn't even say, "That rock has a measure...

I don't eat or sleep properly - I haven't eaten all day until just now, for instance - I have terrible memory, and I often act like a sociopath or som...

Life is full of trouble. We all end up in it. There's literally a sort of river of shit outside of the building to my apartment, not far from my groun...

I went over this. Your reply is nonresponsive and doesn't progress the discussion. Whether I can or can't, defining it isn't necessary if we understan...

It hurts each time someone repeatedly fails to grasp a perfectly reasonable argument that I've made in support of realism, but I'm thinking that maybe...

It's not nonsensical in the context in which I'm saying it, which is not the usual context. In saying it in the usual context, it wouldn't make sense ...