You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Much better. :up:
August 16, 2019 at 01:53
@"schopenhauer1" Weird questions. Don't you already know the answers? Where's the mystery?
August 16, 2019 at 01:40
It relates to what we were just talking about in terms of masculine and feminine. I don't literally believe the part about being in the wrong body, bu...
August 16, 2019 at 01:34
Depends how important it is to the person. If it was that important to me, why would I let the fear of being bullied repress me? For comparison, I did...
August 16, 2019 at 01:24
:lol: I'm not exactly a fan of Christianity, but you take the biscuit. Your title questions are purely hypothetical, rendering the discussion of littl...
August 16, 2019 at 01:00
That one's actually pretty easy to figure out, even without the aid of Google. It means something along the lines that you don't identify as a single,...
August 16, 2019 at 00:53
No, you're not.
August 16, 2019 at 00:44
We weren't talking about sex, we were talking about the concepts of masculine and feminine, and it would be utterly wrongheaded to think about that ex...
August 16, 2019 at 00:36
You don't have to be a great sorcerer in order to have the charisma, personal qualities, and rhetoric required to bring the worst out in people. Hitle...
August 16, 2019 at 00:02
Yes, relating to one's sex, but you're stretching that to absurdity when there's no need. They relate to cultural conceptions of sex in terms of image...
August 15, 2019 at 23:38
Yes you are, because "chair" has a completely different meaning to bicycles. The common meaning is considered the standard for determining correctness...
August 15, 2019 at 23:27
:up:
August 15, 2019 at 23:15
In this case, and many others, they conform because it makes perfect sense. A chair is that thing that you sit on. That's the correct answer in the co...
August 15, 2019 at 23:13
That's a nice little reductio ad absurdum there. Terrapin Station is usually quite logical, so I'm surprised he can't detect the clear fault in his po...
August 15, 2019 at 23:08
That's absurd, and that it is absurd can be put to a test of sorts. A good test to see whether you're talking bollocks is to put it to ordinary people...
August 15, 2019 at 23:04
But it's not about inherent qualities or sexual physiology. It's not on that basis that we talk about feminine hair, jewellery, and clothes. Of course...
August 15, 2019 at 22:52
Exactly. @"Terrapin Station", can't you see the absurdity in making such a charge in these cases? Does it not seem intuitively wrong to you to think o...
August 15, 2019 at 22:33
Okay, fine, I get that, although we're on a philosophy forum after all. How much of what we talk about here really matters in the bigger picture? How ...
August 15, 2019 at 22:15
But they're not simply human behaviours. They are predominantly more masculine or more feminine. Of course, there's nothing inherent about length of h...
August 15, 2019 at 22:06
I have no idea what that really means or why you think it.
August 15, 2019 at 21:54
As is much of what he has been saying: "infinite genders, queer yet functionally straight, the sky is red to me if that's what I believe, if you ident...
August 15, 2019 at 21:48
Yeah, well, you can't get along with everyone. I'm probably not going to get along with someone who oversteps the line by pressuring me to do somethin...
August 15, 2019 at 21:45
And I don't think that it's as clear cut as that. There are multiple layers to this, and your take is too one sided. See my replies to Baden above for...
August 15, 2019 at 21:41
Bothered.
August 15, 2019 at 21:38
I'm simply not going to refer to the other person using language I'm not comfortable with. So it would depend entirely on how I felt at the time. They...
August 15, 2019 at 21:36
How does that supposedly relate to my reply, qualifying that one ought to respect a person's chosen identity within reason? You seem to be ignoring wh...
August 15, 2019 at 21:28
That's oddly one-sided. Why wouldn't the person demanding that I adopt a terminology which I find silly, at the cost of seeing me as personally affron...
August 15, 2019 at 21:11
Within reason.
August 15, 2019 at 20:53
For the simple and fairly obvious reason that people ambiguous in appearance are not speaking out in significant numbers and demanding that I adopt th...
August 15, 2019 at 20:38
But that's not implied by what I said. That's actually a fallacious inference. Feminism, as I characterised it, is all about gender equality, but that...
August 15, 2019 at 20:31
That you've posited something does not make it so. You do understand that, right? You are of course free to go by your own meanings, but no one is obl...
August 15, 2019 at 20:17
I'm fully with you on that first sentence, but the next two sentences are false, even if it might strike some as peculiar. Being queer - outside of th...
August 15, 2019 at 20:14
Oh god. You are very predictable. Sure, whatever, the sky is red, I'm a unicorn, and up is down.
August 15, 2019 at 20:07
And that's why discussion with you is pointless. I think you're in denial. I feel as though if I were to say that the sky is blue, you would deny it a...
August 15, 2019 at 20:01
I never said that thewonder isn't a good person, or anything of the sort. I just literally find some of what he is saying laughable. I know all about ...
August 15, 2019 at 19:50
Frankly, I don't care what you say or think. You don't seem to realise that you aren't dictator of language, as though you can simply declare the univ...
August 15, 2019 at 19:46
And then they came for the Gnostic Christian Bishops! But then they realised that there was only one, and they decided just to leave him be, in his mo...
August 15, 2019 at 19:29
It isn't. I treat that word as basically synonymous with "gay" and "homosexual" and the rest of it is just elaborate nonsense. It's as much nonsense a...
August 15, 2019 at 19:24
Look, I'm not going to continue this discussion with someone with such an extreme set of beliefs. You're like a parody, and I can't really take you se...
August 15, 2019 at 19:18
You can't be serious. Well then your experience must be very limited. And regardless, you're simply not qualified to speak for the community as a whol...
August 15, 2019 at 19:14
I find that last sentence hilarious. Absolutely bonkers.
August 15, 2019 at 19:08
You know, the "queer" community doesn't have a hive mind. There are plenty of people, including myself and a number of my close friends, who are not h...
August 15, 2019 at 19:04
Yes, in short, the Overton window is in dire need of a leftward shift. Perhaps now more than ever.
August 15, 2019 at 18:58
Hahahaha! Yeah, and then we can all sound like we're cockneys. "Oi gov, I ain't dun nufin. E did it, I swears".
August 15, 2019 at 18:44
Thanks, I got a good laugh out of that. :lol:
August 15, 2019 at 18:40
It's all hypothetical anyway, so why even care? It's not like there's any reason to genuinely believe that there's a God to begin with.
August 15, 2019 at 18:36
No, not if the question can't be simplified and made clear, which it almost always can. It's a choice.
August 15, 2019 at 18:34
Except they don't get the preference, at least where I'm from, because thankfully I'm not from an authoritarian society with people who think like you...
August 15, 2019 at 18:30
Oh my goodness. This is a problem of people caring too much. I often include female friends when I say "guys", as that has clearly at some point taken...
August 15, 2019 at 18:27
Then what's the question, more specifically, though without rambling in philoso-jargon?
August 15, 2019 at 18:23