You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Well, if that came to be, I reckon we'd have a revolution on our hands, and I think (and hope) that it would be to a large extent anti-capitalist and ...
February 03, 2016 at 13:11
As a checkout operator, I'm particularly concerned with the fact that advancements in technology have made my job almost redundant. Fortunately for me...
February 03, 2016 at 12:03
That's disgusting! A blue popsicle?! You should wait until you're married before you have sex with her and make her your dinner, otherwise you won't t...
February 03, 2016 at 10:39
I do not agree with the connection that you seem to be making between celibacy and anti-natalism. I don't often talk about this, but I am also celibat...
February 03, 2016 at 02:20
I can live without him. It most likely comes down to how emotionally stirring a set of words are in either case: whether we say that it's because of m...
January 13, 2016 at 20:14
WHAT!? Oh my god. He will live on in legend.
January 11, 2016 at 17:29
Arguing for certain illegal recreational drugs to have a similar legal status as, say, alcohol, is about a positive right, namely the right to partake...
January 08, 2016 at 20:30
Chocolate. I've just been to see Star Wars. It's so good! I wanna see it again, and I wanna see the sequels.
January 07, 2016 at 19:25
Yes, it does seem so, although his comment is ambiguous. It's not clear what he's referring to: whether the full first sentence or just up to the comm...
January 07, 2016 at 12:30
I don't agree with this. I think that there might be exceptions. Isn't it possible that one could consistently devalue or overvalue their life in that...
January 07, 2016 at 04:47
He seems to want you to concede that the feeling necessarily coincides with an examination from the mere fact that the feeling can coincide with an ex...
January 07, 2016 at 04:06
I don't understand how you can think them identical. They are different and distinguishable, they are not logically equivalent, they do not have the s...
January 07, 2016 at 03:43
Yes, well done, I concede, but that is not what I meant, and is beside the point. Your argument results in contradiction, because if gratuitous suffer...
January 07, 2016 at 03:08
Well there is of course one condition, the condition which is implicit in the definition, and which Mike is a bachelor in virtue of. This doesn't over...
January 07, 2016 at 02:20
Well, the converse is invalid, i.e. if something causes preventable suffering, it doesn't following that it's gratuitous suffering, because gratuitous...
January 07, 2016 at 01:21
That's ironic, but not, I suspect, in the way that you intended it to be.
January 07, 2016 at 01:07
@"Soylent" P6 remains unchanged, as therefore does my criticism, which you have yet to address. Also, given your stipulative definition, P6, P7, and C...
January 07, 2016 at 00:48
I'd forgotten that that was the topic of this discussion. Landru's red herring tactic was quite successful.
January 07, 2016 at 00:18
That's evidently false, in spite of your proclaimed surety. How absurd to claim that a feeling depends on a description of it, meaning that you can't ...
January 06, 2016 at 23:45
Well, soundness is what I addressed, but presenting a simplified version has predicably backfired, because one of my objections has already been resol...
January 06, 2016 at 15:30
N.b I am new to this discussion. I have not read the other discussion to which you refer, nor, at this time, have I read any other comments in this di...
January 06, 2016 at 12:47
That would be a pointless exercise. Like John said, the feeling that my life is worth living doesn't depend on my describing it - even if doing so doe...
January 06, 2016 at 02:25
Hey, @"Mongrel"'s back. Welcome back. Also, happy birthday, @"TheWillowOfDarkness". (If it is indeed your birthday).
January 05, 2016 at 23:22
Evidently, not what you think it does. You can assert otherwise until the cows come home, but that won't make it so.
January 05, 2016 at 23:04
No, I don't think that that is what he is claiming, nor what he has implied. Caring about life is that feeling. And this feeling can exist prior to se...
January 05, 2016 at 18:44
This is just one of those silly unjustified and false assertions that give philosophy a bad reputation. Like asserting that if something isn't perceiv...
January 05, 2016 at 18:18
But merely having an opinion about something, and being aware of that fact, is pushing it beyond what's sensible. I assumed that you were referring to...
January 05, 2016 at 16:07
I agree. That's it in a nutshell.
January 04, 2016 at 23:57
If that counts as philosophy, then that's a very broad conception of philosophy. You brought it up. That's a straw man. Who do you think has insisted ...
January 04, 2016 at 23:52
So you say. Yet, upon such examination, myself and others have reached the contrary conclusion. After examining my life, I've come to the realisation ...
January 04, 2016 at 23:42
Oil oil: so good they named it twice.
January 04, 2016 at 23:04
To clarify, the question isn't about the knowledge within one's life, in general. It's specifically about the knowledge that (or whether) one's life i...
January 04, 2016 at 22:05
Good replies so far. I more or less agree with both John and Bitter Crank. I wonder if anyone will unexpectedly defend a 'yes' vote.
January 04, 2016 at 13:52
I only want to understand calculus so I can understand physics. If I could gain a good understanding of the latter without the former... But it seems ...
January 04, 2016 at 02:22
Yes, actually. Queen Elizabeth I had pocket beagles.
January 04, 2016 at 02:03
Yes, I agree with that. My point is that neither feelings nor reason are an infallible means of evaluation.
January 04, 2016 at 01:48
I question whether even the feeling that life is worth living is necessary for a life to be worth living. Isn't it possible for one to have a life wor...
January 04, 2016 at 01:20
The 'sign in'/'sign out' button should be clearer, and in a better location. Also, the 'quote' button should be larger. It's a pain in the arse on a m...
January 04, 2016 at 00:19
Yes, just like that, you whoreson, beetle-headed, flap-ear'd knave! (That's today's one).
January 03, 2016 at 21:06
Perhaps you misspelt "JUNK".
January 03, 2016 at 19:22
Oh, I see. Well, that's good, then. :) I assumed that when Tiff wished you a happy birthday two days ago, it was your birthday.
January 03, 2016 at 18:36
I'll look up what that means later, after work. It does matter. You have implied that whether a life is worth living is dependent on whether one knows...
January 03, 2016 at 12:28
No, he believes that ants are real.
January 03, 2016 at 01:40
I still haven't read December's, but I vote for Quine. Parfit would be my second choice.
January 03, 2016 at 01:29
The 11th of June. I was born in England, where we get dates in the right order.
January 02, 2016 at 23:40
But I didn't make that claim. It doesn't have to be, but it can be, and in some cases, is. I'm not ruling that out. It's just that there are some such...
January 02, 2016 at 22:55
I can empathise with such a feeling. I think that it has been ingrained in many of us. But I can also empathise with the feeling that the former shoul...
January 02, 2016 at 22:35
Well, you're confusing the relationship between them, at least. There is no logical dependency of one on the other. (Unless your argument is an argume...
January 02, 2016 at 21:43
I don't believe in an objective morality, so whether you should or shouldn't isn't as straightforward for my position, but I think that one could quit...
January 02, 2016 at 17:18
Nope, you're just confusing two separate things: that life is worth living and knowledge or awareness that life is worth living. You therefore fail to...
January 02, 2016 at 11:24