You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

But that's off topic. It doesn't matter whether or not he thinks that that's his responsibility. It matters whether or not it is his free will or whet...
August 27, 2019 at 17:53
Okay, but clearly that's not free will. It's not will, and it's not free. It's an unconscious automatic response.
August 27, 2019 at 17:44
I wonder if there's some kind of psychological reason why you want to claim full ownership of your response to things...
August 27, 2019 at 17:37
Ah, so you don't have me on ignore then? :lol: You had me lulled into believing that I could say whatever I liked to you, because you wouldn't see it ...
August 26, 2019 at 22:36
So you don't think that it's bloody obvious that Trump wouldn't spin himself as racist? You think that there's a serious possibility that he would try...
August 26, 2019 at 22:18
That might just be the most stupid thing that you've said so far, and you even repeated yourself, just like Trump does. Not stupid because it is so wr...
August 26, 2019 at 22:00
It's supposed to turn out catastrophically false. It's a reductio ad absurdum. :roll:
August 26, 2019 at 21:39
That is nonsense. Why would you needlessly insert "choice" into that scenario, when it isn't necessary, and when it actually makes the explanation wor...
August 26, 2019 at 21:27
False. That's a loaded question, the unwarranted assumption being that freedom is required. That's a non sequitur, and makes no sense whether you make...
August 26, 2019 at 21:13
Look, you can come up with some lengthy and elaborate explanation for why you said what you did, but none of it matters. If you end up concluding that...
August 26, 2019 at 17:50
Why don't you just say something along the lines that you value collectives and cooperation, that you think they're a good thing, and that you think t...
August 26, 2019 at 17:46
None of that science will ever be logically relevant in ethics because of the is-ought problem. You can't derive an "ought" from an "is".
August 26, 2019 at 17:38
Translation: pick one, and I can deny it and think up some basis to explain it away.
August 26, 2019 at 17:22
It just sounds to me like you're trying to do in different words what Darwin already did, and did better. Survival of the fittest. What's that got to ...
August 26, 2019 at 17:10
You thought of the word "red". That was involuntary. And it was influenced by those words I typed up and submitted. Why don't you just be honest and a...
August 26, 2019 at 17:02
I don't need to do what you ask of me. I've just given you an example of your thoughts being involuntarily influenced, and if you're intellectually ho...
August 26, 2019 at 16:53
But there are plenty of examples in nature of life that is far from flourishing. Animals can live for significant periods without flourishing or excel...
August 26, 2019 at 16:50
So you're a liar, then.
August 26, 2019 at 16:38
You've been given plenty of examples already. Roses are ____ . There you go. That's an example. If you deny that the word of a particular colour didn'...
August 26, 2019 at 16:32
It doesn't follow from the fact that you don't have full control over your mind that someone or something else is controlling your mind. It is known s...
August 26, 2019 at 15:49
Then why define morality in accordance with altruism, as you did in your opening post? That is to argue in favour of altruism. You're not making any s...
August 26, 2019 at 15:39
You said that the sole definition of life is to flourish competitively. That's not true, and that's not to be found in any dictionary definition. That...
August 26, 2019 at 14:42
I know what you think, but if you worded yourself better to begin with, then you could likely avoid these kind of objections, and then you wouldn't ha...
August 26, 2019 at 14:28
How much of this discussion has just been you completely getting the wrong end of the stick?
August 26, 2019 at 14:08
Haha. Sure, you have 100% full control of your mind. What a joke.
August 26, 2019 at 11:32
You asked a question, I answered it. And the first part of my sentence you quoted is clearly about his reasoning, so why ask what that has to do with ...
August 26, 2019 at 11:08
It would lead to all kinds of wrong, including permissible discrimination, a rise in hate crime, permissible fraud, and things like this: Your ignoran...
August 26, 2019 at 10:58
The moral of the story would be to reject both extreme censorship and free speech fanaticism, and to support instead a reasonable balance between the ...
August 24, 2019 at 16:21
Okay. You asked: And the answer is that you could apply the same reasoning, but in the case of hate speech there's a sensible basis for banning it, or...
August 24, 2019 at 15:57
Why are you continuing to pursue this when we both know that it's a stupid idea, not at all comparable to hate speech? What?
August 24, 2019 at 13:34
Do you do this on purpose? Just curious. Okay, just swap "being angry" with "being spurned romantically". It's not like that makes it any less impract...
August 24, 2019 at 12:49
Sadly I think that that's true. Hopefully at the next opportunity there will be a change from Trump-Johnson to Bernie-Corbyn.
August 24, 2019 at 12:31
That's another really good example. The typical person you'd stop on the street would readily accept that. This isn't a genuine debate here, because t...
August 24, 2019 at 12:23
It would be practically impossible to ban anger, so that's not even worth bringing up as an attempt at producing a counterexample. Also, there's a sim...
August 24, 2019 at 12:17
I think that he is one of those people who uses technical-sounding terms in a jumbled and sporadic manner in the hope of sounding like more of an inte...
August 23, 2019 at 18:29
You do realise that "contribute" is not a variation in verb form of the noun "consequence", right? You should have stuck to talking about consequences...
August 23, 2019 at 18:21
No, you still need to explain yourself properly. This is going to be a needlessly lengthy discussion if you keep responding like that. Why don't you s...
August 23, 2019 at 18:12
Yes. They're two different words, with two different meanings. The word "contribute" has more of a positive connotation (as in e.g. "What did you cont...
August 23, 2019 at 18:06
You have no clue, generally. Do you know what it means to move the goalposts, in the context of informal logic?
August 23, 2019 at 17:57
I am from Europe, specifically the United Kingdom, and more specifically England. We have a multiparty system here, and more so than the United States...
August 23, 2019 at 17:54
Haha, yes, I know you said "contributing". And that's a variation of "contribution", but you weren't originally talking about contribution. You switch...
August 23, 2019 at 17:49
:brow: Should we call the NSPCC?
August 23, 2019 at 17:44
You've switched from "consequence" to "contribution". Moving the goalposts again, I see. One consequence which your speech tends to have on me is that...
August 23, 2019 at 17:35
The Democratic Party is the main left-wing party in the United States. They're a centre-left party, and that still counts as left-wing, regardless of ...
August 23, 2019 at 17:29
Just out of curiosity, if an Islamist acolyte of a preacher of hate and violence against infidels murdered those whom you most care about, you'd still...
August 23, 2019 at 17:15
Funnily enough, foundations in madness lead to more madness.
August 23, 2019 at 17:08
There isn't only one option. I think you need to backtrack and explain yourself properly before directing such loaded questions my way.
August 23, 2019 at 17:06
The clue was in my reply. Because there are no objective moral values, I basically take the track of "letting people do what they want to do" as much ...
August 23, 2019 at 17:03
Well, dream on.
August 23, 2019 at 17:01
Yes, an example of moving the goalposts. (And it's weird that he keeps talking about telekinesis and sorcery when no one else is).
August 23, 2019 at 16:58