You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

British troops condemned over Iraqi boy's death in 2003 "Justice".
September 16, 2016 at 08:53
I'm a bit confused by your title. You don't once mention God in the text of your opening post.
September 11, 2016 at 22:12
British Labour Leaders edited by Charles Clarke & Toby James. I keep reading a bit from one book and then jump to the next. Anyone else do that? I sho...
September 11, 2016 at 22:00
As I just mentioned to Terrapin Station, I have a backlog of replies to get through, and I feel like I'm 'jumping the queue' by replying to yours befo...
September 11, 2016 at 18:12
I've got a backlog of replies to get through, by the way. Including several of yours. I haven't caught up yet.
September 11, 2016 at 17:34
Yes, and I agree that ethics is about feelings, at least in part. But I don't think that that resolves the issues I raised. That's why I said "in spit...
September 11, 2016 at 17:25
The only reason? I see more than that. I spoke about beliefs we find objectionable, and we find some beliefs inherently objectionable, i.e. prior to o...
September 11, 2016 at 13:55
You can create a new discussion and put it in the general philosophy category (or wherever you think is most appropriate).
September 10, 2016 at 22:45
Then I think that your understanding either overlooks or fails to account for some important aspects of human behaviour, psychology and morality. Some...
September 10, 2016 at 15:02
No, not in other words, in your mistaken analysis.
September 10, 2016 at 14:55
Yes, it does. It was a very minor point about your your erroneous wording. And that wasn't the statement that I was addressing in my criticism; that w...
September 10, 2016 at 14:50
Wow.
September 10, 2016 at 14:06
I like that: the belief is immoral because - don't be racist! :D But no, that isn't a fair representation of my position, and your attempted reductio ...
September 09, 2016 at 19:48
No, since that depends on us. Removing us from that equation results in nonsense. But it doesn't depend on whatever a single individual just happens t...
September 09, 2016 at 19:24
I meant that it can be the right thing to do. In other words, that it can be warranted, or that one would be justified in doing so. And I stand by tha...
September 09, 2016 at 19:12
Interesting. So, if we apply that interpretation, and go back to where we were beforehand, then... What was your query, again? What was it that you we...
September 09, 2016 at 18:18
But I don't understand why you feel that way, in spite of your explanation. They do have to do with ethics, despite your personal feelings. Personal f...
September 09, 2016 at 17:40
Beat me (and my other selves) to the punch. How dare you steal my thunder? (N)
September 09, 2016 at 17:13
But we weren't talking about that until you changed the subject. As can be seen, although you have taken my quote out of its context, I was talking ab...
September 09, 2016 at 16:49
No, that isn't what it means, but that is what it conveys, or at least something similar. It's difficult to explain, and its use is fairly unique. I d...
September 09, 2016 at 16:31
Oh Yeah Thanks
September 09, 2016 at 16:12
Did you do something differently? Because I separated them with a space - which you should be able to see if you go to edit my post - and it didn't wo...
September 09, 2016 at 16:09
It means what it says. It's prescriptive, a bit like an instruction, whereas the latter is descriptive. It's not redundant or viciously circular to sa...
September 09, 2016 at 16:01
Not objective morality, but objective or inter-subjective categorisation regarding morality. Just as you'd be mistaken to categorise, say, a wardrobe,...
September 09, 2016 at 15:35
That doesn't make sense, since whether it's correct to morally judge beliefs or expression is not a statement, but the issue under discussion. You can...
September 09, 2016 at 15:17
That you rightly qualify with "some" and "most" and "in my experience" and "I think" is telling, and flies in the face of your first sentence. It can,...
September 09, 2016 at 15:03
I can't separate bullet pointed paragraphs with a space between them, nor can I quote them. This is very annoying. I want to be able to put a space be...
September 09, 2016 at 14:55
1. I don't think that it makes any sense whatsoever to refrain from judging any belief or statement solely on the basis that it is a belief or a state...
September 09, 2016 at 14:49
But the first sort of belief would include belief in offensive racial stereotypes, which is morally wrong.
September 09, 2016 at 13:58
/uploads/files/sn/cp9gzpb5x6g34125.png
September 09, 2016 at 13:36
What's your point?
September 09, 2016 at 13:25
No, they don't mean the same thing, although the latter follows from the former. No, because they don't mean the same thing. The belief is immoral bec...
September 09, 2016 at 13:21
It might seem like that to you. It doesn't seem like that to me. That clearly isn't what I said.
September 09, 2016 at 12:10
The same factors which determine whether we should or shouldn't believe something (in an ethical context). For example, we shouldn't believe that raci...
September 09, 2016 at 12:07
Yes. An immoral belief is immoral. There might well be exceptions to the way that you've worded it. A false moral belief isn't necessarily immoral, ju...
September 09, 2016 at 11:51
No, I meant that the content of the belief is immoral, but it is not immoral to have it under those circumstances.
September 09, 2016 at 11:45
Sigh. Your edit was too late! :D
September 09, 2016 at 11:43
Sure. I mentioned one already. When I attended secondary school, I was at times judgemental and abusive without good reason, and I believed that that ...
September 09, 2016 at 11:39
Not necessarily, no. Like I said, it's complex. And it's open to discussion and debate. It might make more sense to judge it case by case and examine ...
September 09, 2016 at 11:21
It can be complex. But, for example, usually children aren't as morally responsible as adults with full mental capacity. So, that's two factors: age a...
September 09, 2016 at 11:15
Well, there are legal exceptions based on ethical reasoning, whether you agree with them or not. And the U.K. is much better in terms of freedom of sp...
September 09, 2016 at 11:09
Yes, in reality, beliefs affect people, even if not in terms of actions you might expect to see as a result, or in terms of any (external) action at a...
September 09, 2016 at 10:56
Moral responsibility. The former has it, whereas the latter lacks it.
September 09, 2016 at 10:50
Not necessarily, but only if one is culpable. And there can be mitigating circumstances. But in some cases, yes.
September 09, 2016 at 10:40
Yes. I think that it's still a bad thing to believe. The belief itself is immoral. The believer should not have that belief. It is wrong to believe th...
September 09, 2016 at 10:37
Okay. So, does that mean that you believe that matter-of-fact beliefs can't be morally right or wrong? So, for example, if one believes that, as a mat...
September 09, 2016 at 10:17
Nope. I was just describing what you were doing, as I understood it. The same way that it's used in your sphere of the world. Because other statements...
September 09, 2016 at 09:47
These are the comments which lead to the creation of this discussion:
September 09, 2016 at 08:55
No, not specifically. No. Again, that wasn't the question. I'm assuming an ethical context, or at least what would appear to be an ethical context. I ...
September 09, 2016 at 08:44
I'm always right.
September 09, 2016 at 02:01