You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

This statement suggests two things: (1) that loyalty is secondary to whatever it is that makes something good; and (2) that loyalty in itself isn't go...
February 04, 2017 at 22:11
You wouldn't though, would you? (Because you're crazy). :D An ethical point of view is the only relevant point of view, given that we're discussing mo...
February 04, 2017 at 21:29
That's crazy. And no, everyone doesn't. In some cases, many people share my view that they should be lauded for doing the right thing in difficult cir...
February 04, 2017 at 15:17
On the contrary, if they're bad enough, and if you subscribe to a duty-based ethics, then it's your overriding duty to betray them. Either way, it'd b...
February 04, 2017 at 13:29
But it is good to betray bad principles, people, etc., whether you dislike it or or not. (Unless perhaps it was over something lacking significance). ...
February 04, 2017 at 10:56
Wow. Really? Loyalty above all of the others, high authority, and harm at the bottom? That's so wrong. :-} Loyalty is one of the least relevant. I can...
February 03, 2017 at 23:55
/uploads/resized/files/wa/liof9g2k2hne1l2e.png
February 03, 2017 at 23:45
Where can you take Haidt's moral foundations test?
February 03, 2017 at 21:48
Yes, I agree, and I know what you should do about it. You should lose more.
February 03, 2017 at 21:36
Did you? I don't remember that. :D Anyway, we agreed about the right to have an abortion in reasonable circumstances; that it should be legal in most ...
February 03, 2017 at 21:11
That's just speculation, and I can do that too. For example, the way I see it, they're the effects of a celestial teapot. It is crystal clear at this ...
February 03, 2017 at 17:36
I can't recall much that we have disagreed about politically other than in that discussion on abortion, where we were also in agreement. And I thought...
February 03, 2017 at 15:39
Interesting. So me, you and Crank are on the same page. I was determined to complete it, even though on my first attempt the webpage refreshed 40 ques...
February 03, 2017 at 15:23
/uploads/files/go/d4wzhitmiizsxazc.png /uploads/resized/files/ig/rayqdj6rccht9l8t.png /uploads/resized/files/57/1f099yjmju2zzovd.png Interesting. Base...
February 03, 2017 at 14:05
It's imperative that we find what the cause was. Forget "socialism or death", it's socialism by death.
February 02, 2017 at 23:15
I might've known that at some point, but if so, I must've forgotten it. I thought that the experts had concluded that it was probably spread by fleas,...
February 02, 2017 at 22:45
Did anyone else misread that? Or is it just my perverted subconscious filtering through?
February 02, 2017 at 22:28
Bob is partly to blame in both cases, and bears some responsibility. He agreed to do something, then he fucked up, and this caused the financial cost ...
February 02, 2017 at 22:04
Done! They're not welcome over here. Britain should enforce a ban on cockroaches of any sort. Unless they're Christian.
February 02, 2017 at 21:45
It seems that backpedaling is the order of the day across the pond. Although we've had our fair share of it over here after the EU referendum - whatev...
February 02, 2017 at 21:41
Conclusion: ban deer and other such prey from being taught logic. They must be kept dumb for the sake of their own survival. No, no, no. They just did...
February 02, 2017 at 21:11
https://youtu.be/mSy5mEcmgwU I'm actually inclined to agree with your point about the relationship between the immigration ban and a Muslim ban. But I...
February 02, 2017 at 20:56
No. No it isn't. Not at all. This is very clearly about Trump; not Americans. Your speculation is way off the mark. And it wouldn't even be a Trump ba...
February 02, 2017 at 19:04
That's a misquote.
February 02, 2017 at 18:48
It isn't an appeal to the government, which I agree is inept in many ways. It is a petition to the UK Parliament. And it succeeded in forcing the UK P...
February 02, 2017 at 14:41
No, I don't think you have. You've replied, but that isn't the same thing. Are you sure you're not a troll? Because that is pretty funny. Even if you ...
February 02, 2017 at 14:14
Well you haven't come across as either particularly sincere or particularly reasonable.
February 02, 2017 at 13:51
What does that mean? Evidence that you're just trolling?
February 02, 2017 at 13:35
I almost spat out my drink! >:O
February 02, 2017 at 13:33
That isn't what I asked for. I made reference to evidence that an existing God is a more likely cause of all of these effects than any other possible ...
February 02, 2017 at 13:18
It wouldn't make much sense to answer that question without going into specifics, but if you do so, you could probably answer the question yourself by...
February 02, 2017 at 13:12
Compared to a sound deductive argument, yes, of course it is. I don't think any reasonable person would claim that the scientific method is without fl...
February 02, 2017 at 13:07
Then you should further clarify your claim. What are you claiming, more precisely? That an existing God is a more likely cause of all of these effects...
February 02, 2017 at 13:05
>:o
February 02, 2017 at 13:01
You sonofabitch, how dare you beat me to the punch?! And by less than a minute!
February 02, 2017 at 12:58
Formal fallacies, such as affirming the consequent, only have relevance to deductive arguments, in which the conclusion necessarily follows. Science i...
February 02, 2017 at 12:57
You yourself admit that it's a fallacy, so that spells the end for your argument, irrespective of what you or I think about science.
February 02, 2017 at 12:48
That's one of the worst arguments I've seen in a long time. You'd need another argument to show that this is God and not merely imagination, feeling, ...
February 02, 2017 at 12:21
I am the 1,815,561st person to have added their signature to a petition to the UK Parliament to prevent Donald Trump from making a State Visit to the ...
February 02, 2017 at 02:38
UK faces return to inequality of Thatcher years, says report John McDonnell MP responds to Resolution Foundation Report
February 02, 2017 at 01:13
Ty Segall's new self-titled album. Love Ty, but don't like this album as much as his previous albums. These two tracks stand out: https://youtu.be/3dN...
February 01, 2017 at 23:34
When I said that it isn't quite so black and white, I meant that it doesn't have to be either one or the other. To represent the majority vote would i...
January 31, 2017 at 17:37
Given what I said, it couldn't be in the delegate sense, except by coincidence. Both in this case. I'm not making a general point about the details of...
January 31, 2017 at 17:03
It isn't quite so black and white, but in this case, given its context, I think that they should be representing the majority vote. It's a false analo...
January 31, 2017 at 16:23
I haven't even used the term "anti-democratic", and I said that it's about failing to be representative. Of course there is. The result of the referen...
January 31, 2017 at 16:09
No, that's wrong. What do you think that their job entails as a representative and member of the House of Commons? Being freely elected is merely how ...
January 31, 2017 at 15:59
They are part of a larger argument. Not all of which was explicit in the reasons I gave. So your charge of non sequitur is premature.
January 31, 2017 at 15:47
It's about failing to be representative.
January 31, 2017 at 15:45
Yes, it does. You said it is strange. I addressed that by saying that it isn't, because of x, y, and z.
January 31, 2017 at 15:40
It isn't that strange given that: Britain is a democracy. The two main parties you referred to are democratic. There was a referendum.
January 31, 2017 at 15:38