You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Right, that's the last straw. In protest, this will be the last comment I ever make. Not just on the forum, but outside of the forum as well. Which me...
February 27, 2017 at 22:37
At least for the man on the street. But the man on the street probably isn't as philosophical as we are. Nevertheless, in practice, yes, I doubt we're...
February 27, 2017 at 22:15
If Searle said "Jump of a cliff"... So the man on the street believes that the pineal gland is the principal seat of the soul? And that material objec...
February 27, 2017 at 21:21
Some combo of the two. There certainly seems to be idea-like stuff and material-like stuff, and I would say that that's a common sense metaphysical vi...
February 27, 2017 at 21:02
Then, can you be more specific? I suppose I could describe it in a number of ways, but where to begin?
February 27, 2017 at 20:53
Eh? That's not very specific. If you want me to categorise it as either monist, dualist or pluralist, then I won't do that as I'm undecided. I would d...
February 27, 2017 at 20:45
Maybe. But common sense saying that ideas and physical stuff is real doesn't go far enough to imply dualism.
February 27, 2017 at 20:36
Realistic. To be dualistic, like aletheist said, you'd have to consider them to be fundamentally different and, in some ways, mutually exclusive.
February 27, 2017 at 20:33
I object to what you seem to be insinuating there. In my role as a moderator, I don't defend anything that I don't agree with. I defended Baden's acti...
February 27, 2017 at 20:17
All of those and more. It was misleasing, outrageous, and disgraceful. And, given that he seemed to willfully ignore the criticism of what he was doin...
February 27, 2017 at 20:03
What he did was more serious than silliness. You should use a more suitable term.
February 27, 2017 at 19:51
You can't even get his name right. You keep calling him Emptyheaded, but his name was Emptyheady.
February 27, 2017 at 19:23
In what sense? I'm not sure what you're asking. Bit vague.
February 27, 2017 at 19:09
Yes. I tend to behave as though our common sense beliefs are true, and my metaphysics largely coincides with our common sense beliefs: the world exist...
February 27, 2017 at 19:04
That might be what you would have done. That might be your preferred course of action. But you are not a moderator or an administrator. Again, see the...
February 27, 2017 at 18:39
See the guidelines. The guidelines are just guidelines, meaning we have some leeway. He cherry picked statistics and used them in a misleading and out...
February 27, 2017 at 18:26
That's fine with me. What he did was wrong and was grounds for being banned. Like it says in the guidelines: He flew too close to the sun.
February 27, 2017 at 18:03
No, that wasn't the point of your original argument, since there is no mention at all of "physical" in this argument. Colours, shapes, smells and soun...
February 27, 2017 at 09:22
I didn't ban him, Baden did. And I doubt that any member of the site staff would say that that's an impossibility. So yes, perhaps (in my sense, not y...
February 26, 2017 at 19:08
It is used to express uncertainty or possibility, but perhaps he meant it in the way you describe.
February 26, 2017 at 19:00
No, he said "perhaps". :-}
February 26, 2017 at 18:37
Most employers have a zero tolerance approach to racism. I reckon if higher ups found out about that, he could get fired.
February 26, 2017 at 18:10
Well, with many companies, by working for them, you have to be seen to accept and represent their values, and it is my understanding that extreme view...
February 26, 2017 at 17:51
Couldn't that get him fired? Inform the company that he is a self-professed national socialist and fascist. Get him fired. Problem solved. X-)
February 26, 2017 at 14:35
I'll ask God for a selfie, and if he agrees, then I'll share it online.
February 26, 2017 at 09:36
Ooh, awesome! Exciting, isn't it?
February 26, 2017 at 09:31
Damn. And he told me on the phone that he only wanted to pop over for a cuppa. There was no mention from him of spanking. Yeah, I don't know why he wa...
February 25, 2017 at 11:07
Yes, 1930 hours GMT (Green Mandrake Time), 2017-03-03.
February 25, 2017 at 01:11
All they'd have to do is look inside themselves. It's filed under "P".
February 25, 2017 at 01:08
GMT.
February 25, 2017 at 01:00
Then what's the problem? You'll be a millionaire! Stop complaining and start planning. What are going to buy? A yacht? A mansion? A sports car?
February 25, 2017 at 00:50
Yes, I suppose so, except where staff should step in. Like I said, the readership are important too. They will expect a discussion to relate to the ti...
February 25, 2017 at 00:43
No. If that's all you meant, then I misunderstood. You asked, "Why not leave the judgement of what is acceptable discussion, to the discretion of that...
February 25, 2017 at 00:32
Yes, I was aware of that exception. Setting that aside then - all else being equal.
February 25, 2017 at 00:04
Here's to fruitless threads! /uploads/resized/files/nc/5gkiiq5s1xcdbjua.jpg
February 25, 2017 at 00:02
In a sense and to some extent, yes. But then, so do you, and so does Benkei. (As well as others. Hopefully I have one too (Who am I kidding? Of course...
February 24, 2017 at 23:28
He kind of has a point, you know. If you had've ignored his original comment, then it might've stopped there. But you replied, and then he replied, an...
February 24, 2017 at 23:15
Yeah, I pretty much agree with everything you just said. (And yeah, that was a very big "if"). One point, though, regarding what you've said about eph...
February 24, 2017 at 22:56
Thorongil likes simple solutions, so here's a simple solution: don't leave it until a moderator comes along and takes moderator action, but instead ta...
February 24, 2017 at 22:16
In the case of God, it means, for example, that he is able to pop over for a quick cuppa. He couldn't do that if he didn't exist. My expectation is th...
February 24, 2017 at 22:00
We may well agree, but I have been raising possible objections. Lets assume that I accept that without any objections. So what?
February 24, 2017 at 20:15
Hmm. You'll have to wait until some time next month, I think - 9:45am, Wednesday 29th, to be precise.
February 24, 2017 at 18:51
Not if you're a moderator, which he is. A moderator who doesn't read what he doesn't like wouldn't be a very good moderator, since what you don't like...
February 24, 2017 at 18:47
From a staff perspective, that's just hypothetical. It's down to the staff to make that judgement, notify members, and take any action deemed necessar...
February 24, 2017 at 17:53
Okay. I understand now, and, going by that definition, I agree. Okay, yes, that makes sense. But my replies were addressed to those who didn't seem to...
February 24, 2017 at 11:58
@"Michael", contrary to my view in that other discussion, I don't think that a semantic approach gets to the heart of the issue. I'd want to see scien...
February 24, 2017 at 11:44
Yes, that's how it is normally categorised. I get that. But that definition you gave would not rule out paedophilia, would it? Since it doesn't contai...
February 24, 2017 at 11:37
Okay, so then, if you identified in that way but exclusively about children, then wouldn't what we call paedophilia count as a sexual orientation (by ...
February 24, 2017 at 11:28
Well, I'm not really going to dispute that. I'm not going to claim that it's not a paraphillia or that it is a sexual orientation. It would certainly ...
February 24, 2017 at 11:12
In that sense, I think that they are analogous to homosexuality. If this avoidance is what is meant by control, then sure, that can be done. But when ...
February 23, 2017 at 23:58