Please don't, because I have already explained why that's a stupid request. What part did you not understand? I'm running out of ways to explain to yo...
I provided the statistics and further details elsewhere in another discussion on gun control that we both participated in. Neither you nor anyone else...
This does not work in your favour. Those things undermine the presumed usefulness of guns. And those ways in which you can use them are restricted by ...
Yes, I have, both here and elsewhere. Because guns carry a greater risk. You're more likely to die from a gunshot wound than a stab wound, for example...
Yes, he did the same thing with my example of mines. Anything so long as guns are the answer, it seems. Alternatives are to be dismissed, even if they...
It was true because your response contained questions that didn't need to be asked, because you could have gotten the answers from what I'd said previ...
Then "you composed a silly response". Beside the point. That they're as effective as a gun? Don't need to, don't intend to. It didn't seem to sink in ...
There's practically no situation where a gun, rather than some other form of self-defence, would be necessary. If you need to ask me what those other ...
It's excessive force to shoot someone that you could have disabled in a less dangerous way. There's practically no situation where a gun, rather than ...
One difference between miracles and fantasy is that one doesn't ever happen and the other does. Fantasies occur in the minds of people from time to ti...
It's a poor argument because it says nothing of excessive force or risk of harm. You should not have a right to use excessive force or pose a risk to ...
That a group of liberals seem to have been caught applying a double standard has no bearing on me or my stance that the U.S. Bill of Rights ought to b...
From what I gather, the argument missing from the opening post is something like: Lions are not murderers, and I have some very strong moral beliefs. ...
It's not a very clever strategy if you want me to read what you're saying in full and give it careful consideration. Do you want my attention or do yo...
No, I know the episode well, and the discussion here made me think of that as well. But, as a reply to what I said, that's changing the subject. It's ...
Yes they would, actually, and I am one of them. Why? Well, because once again, context matters. There's an episode of Stewart Lee's Comedy Vehicle tha...
Yes, quite. But it happened to be a twenty-something in the example, so that's what I've been referring back to. Your reply has given me some food for...
Yes, it can. That would be this: But remember, that's not what actually happened. What actually happened was an exchange of remarks, in a good-humoure...
What have I been saying? What's the big point that I have been trying to emphasise? Context matters. So no, it is not at all how it seems to you. I wa...
Well, interestingly, what this discussion has seemingly demonstrated is that the tongue-in-cheek use of sexist stereotypes as bait, like that of shril...
Is it a great loss? Maybe not. Does it need to be? No. I for one am glad to see that there are still people who actually stop and think about these th...
I know the book. It was given as a present to my brother during his stint as a reckless drunk. I have Five On Brexit Island. It's presently sitting ac...
No, trust me, the misunderstanding is all yours. I neither claimed nor implied that they're the same. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of that i...
Yes it is, and there is no shortage of examples from which to choose. Just consider criminal law and how regularly it's enforced. And parliament is th...
Yes, and sometimes it's otherwise. Sometimes it's refreshing to listen to an alternative to the predictable mainstream emphasis on political correctne...
Jane Moore, Sue Carroll, Julia Hartley-Brewer, Katie Hopkins... What thoughts and feelings have these women expressed about this kind of thing? I spok...
That would be the greatest of crimes, and the perpetrator would have to be severely punished, like all deliberate cunts ought to be. This is no laughi...
That's not what it usually means. It usually means spiteful, malicious, catty, vindictive... yet they considered it banter - the playful and friendly ...
Yes, I suppose it could in some situations. But, to go back to the example, what business is it of a few twenty-somethings, who were not even there, w...
Besides, you have zero credibility when you talk about these matters, since you frequently and openly praise Donald Trump, recently saying that he's a...
Comments