You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

No, that's a potential wealth generating mechanism. An important distinction. Are you suggesting that those included in the 99% should each take a gam...
November 17, 2017 at 22:13
That's a very good question. I'd quite like to see a lot more class consciousness. Given enough people, it might even lead to a revolution of sorts.
November 17, 2017 at 17:58
No, that's not a fair assessment. Come on, Agustino, I think you know that that's not what I was getting at. I have already explained why it is unfair...
November 17, 2017 at 17:46
How does that come into this? To compare our positions: you want a smaller state and are in favour of economic liberalism*, whereas I want a bigger st...
November 17, 2017 at 12:03
I went on to explain that. At some point it's down to you. You either recognise it or you don't. If you don't recognise it, you don't recognise it. It...
November 17, 2017 at 11:31
I'm going to overlook this.
November 17, 2017 at 10:29
Yeah, whoops! Seems obvious now. I think with all of the recent talk about Australia, I misread.
November 17, 2017 at 10:21
It's a problem if it's excessive. That would be a problem because it's unfair and creates an imbalance. And an imbalance impacts people like me. That ...
November 16, 2017 at 21:55
This is hilarious. We should take it to the workplace. Who's with me? :D
November 16, 2017 at 21:25
I can out-Hanover Hanover any day of the week. I don't just steal personalities, I outshadow the originals.
November 16, 2017 at 21:20
No. Me owl, you ass. /uploads/files/yh/s794e9z9hgnn0dul.png
November 16, 2017 at 21:03
This, coming from delicate Delilah: "I'm not angry, Benkei!", "Stop calling me emotional!". >:o /uploads/files/45/420i104n1ondj99c.png
November 16, 2017 at 20:45
I will, and I will pass on your message by whispering it creepily in his ear before molesting him. *Throws another mop in Baden's face*
November 16, 2017 at 20:41
I first read that as "insensitive care", and I thought to myself, "Sounds like my kinda place". Cunt. :D
November 16, 2017 at 20:36
Yes. Here, catch! *Throws mop in Baden's face*
November 16, 2017 at 20:31
In consecutive order: was here not too long ago, don't know who you mean, joined but never comments, joined and hung around for a while but went off t...
November 16, 2017 at 20:26
Boo! (N) Unfairness is that and more. Excessive accumulation of money is a problem, as is tax avoidance and evasion (I forget which is which, and woul...
November 16, 2017 at 20:09
Agustino has convinced me that she should show some entrepreneurial spirit and provide for herself. Filthy scrounger. Why should I have to share my ha...
November 16, 2017 at 18:40
Yes, I am a creepy lollipop lady. Would you like to lick my lollipop whilst my starving cat watches with her freakishly large eyes?
November 16, 2017 at 18:25
The statement that I was referring to, Agustino, was your statement on the first page, namely that the war against progressive taxation is a good thin...
November 16, 2017 at 18:06
I was born with a personality. I was born fully grown, fully armed, and wearing a full suit of armour. But I wasn't born in the traditional way.
November 16, 2017 at 17:37
@"Agustino", do you still call yourself a socialist? I see very little evidence of that here. On the contrary, this isn't just a defence of capitalism...
November 16, 2017 at 17:20
So today I arrived at the hospital and gave birth to a fat cunt. I asked it, "Why is a raven like a writing desk?", and it opened its mouth wide and s...
November 16, 2017 at 15:55
I am not surprised that there are people who are willing to read, listen, and entertain astrology and those who believe in it. That is testament to th...
November 16, 2017 at 13:59
Here are some specific examples of double standards: 1. Only he is allowed to joke around. It doesn't work both ways. 2. Complains of belittling atmos...
November 16, 2017 at 13:32
Only he is allowed to joke around. It doesn't work both ways.
November 16, 2017 at 13:12
My eyes are rolling so hard right now that it feels like they're about to pop out of their sockets. Just take a look at his comments in that discussio...
November 16, 2017 at 13:06
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE
November 16, 2017 at 12:55
The Star Trek Martyr has spoken. Take heed.
November 16, 2017 at 12:29
That's fine with me. You laugh from the sidelines, yet you can't take a joke, and your attempt at substance got picked apart quicker than you can say ...
November 16, 2017 at 12:21
You don't. To think otherwise exemplifies a failure in understanding. I can tell you what he's trying to do. He's attacking a weaker position than my ...
November 16, 2017 at 11:35
No, it really wasn't, and that comment only serves to reflect your poor judgement. The first sentence is false, and the second sentence contains a fal...
November 16, 2017 at 11:32
Sorry about that. I won't make that same mistake twice.
November 16, 2017 at 11:15
It's a brand of razors for men. The best a man can get. I be Sapientia. I is an owl. I hate the moderators, despite being one of them, and I hate ever...
November 16, 2017 at 01:30
I haven't been keeping up with the news, but I'm guessing that Australia have made Nyan Cat a national hero.
November 16, 2017 at 00:38
Straw man alert! You could have just asked me to elaborate - although I accept that in your world that sort of thing might be considered outlandish - ...
November 15, 2017 at 23:42
Ah yes, Bentham. That other notorious postmodernist. Full of malarkey. Yes, why would you want to elaborate in a discussion of all places? What is thi...
November 15, 2017 at 23:10
What's wrong with ?
November 15, 2017 at 19:28
Sounds like the title of a discussion created by Robert Lockhart.
November 15, 2017 at 19:12
Well, why didn't you say so? Wording is important when coming up with a definition. Of course not! That'd be crazy, unless you have a death wish.
November 15, 2017 at 18:54
If that's the case, then you'd fit right in, as your own comments have been belittling. But maybe it's for the best if you have little of substance to...
November 15, 2017 at 18:49
I don't care. I'm not guilty by association. I see right through what you're doing. What was your point? Your contributions seem to consist of petty s...
November 15, 2017 at 18:33
It's not malarkey, and it's not postmodernist malarkey. You need to brush up on your history of philosophy. Hume rejected the doctrine of natural righ...
November 15, 2017 at 17:58
But, instead of requesting a demonstration, you decided to repeatedly challenge what I said with your non sequitur and your demands that I support a c...
November 15, 2017 at 15:42
It would be like punishing little kids for playing with sharp knives. Some might well be more responsible than others. Some might not end up hurting t...
November 14, 2017 at 18:49
It was entirely avoidable, but you just had to make stuff up, instead of actually quoting what I said, didn't you? You just had to stubbornly persist ...
November 14, 2017 at 18:25
Yes I have, and no I didn't. I challenge you to show me where I have made that claim, as you have worded it. Once you realise that I have made no such...
November 14, 2017 at 05:19
You don't have to take my word for it, actually. You can bring up my comment with the quoted statistical data and linked sources by simply entering "g...
November 14, 2017 at 05:15