You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Oh, whoops, I didn't mean to overlook the "in space" part. But that doesn't matter because it's nonsense to say that God exists outside of space, unle...
January 19, 2019 at 19:57
It's the most common understanding, and Cambridge dictionary, for example, defines it as everything that exists.
January 19, 2019 at 19:51
A two-wheeled handcart used especially by street vendors, an ancient burial mound, or a male pig castrated before maturity.
January 19, 2019 at 19:42
You're suggesting that we should make a special exception so that a word means something completely different just so you can avoid a contradiction in...
January 19, 2019 at 19:35
Wubba lubba dub-dub!
January 19, 2019 at 19:21
Correct, I've never seen "Rick and Morty". I've been too busy refuting arguments for theism and getting shwifty.
January 19, 2019 at 19:18
You're suggesting that we should make a special exception so that a word means something completely different just so you can avoid a contradiction in...
January 19, 2019 at 19:10
A position which rejects a contradiction in terms is somehow less reasonable than a position which entertains and accepts it. Good argument. What next...
January 19, 2019 at 18:52
You do have a problem. I have agreed with an argument which misses the point, also known as irrelevant conclusion or by the Latin ignoratio elenchi. I...
January 19, 2019 at 18:29
In a nutshell, your argument seems to rely on tricking people through equivocation of "based on a reason" and "reasonable", which would be sophistry. ...
January 19, 2019 at 18:18
No, you don't seem to understand. I asked whether you are going to address the problems with it: If you're happy to, then please go ahead.
January 19, 2019 at 18:08
I accept it (with the addition of some minor qualifications). Now, are you going to address the problems with it?
January 19, 2019 at 17:40
Let's just move on to the conclusion. You don't need my acceptance of your premises, we can just assume that for argument's sake. Now, setting facts a...
January 19, 2019 at 17:26
That's not even a definition, it's just someone's opinion about abstract thinking as contrasted with concrete thinking. Abstract thinking is thinking ...
January 19, 2019 at 17:05
Yes, I agree. But this still has zero relation to reasonable/unreasonable, so you still need to account for that if that's what your conclusion is abo...
January 19, 2019 at 16:52
And you probably still don't. Apology accepted.
January 19, 2019 at 16:22
Incorrect.
January 19, 2019 at 16:19
Incorrect. I'm telling you how I use the word. I use the word in the way that is commonly understood. And I'm pointing out that, going by this meaning...
January 19, 2019 at 16:16
I know, right?
January 19, 2019 at 16:07
This is your problem, not mine. If you want to avoid the contradiction, then use a different word instead of the word "universe", because the word "un...
January 19, 2019 at 15:54
I agree, but that doesn't mean that they're reasonable (by the definition I go by). As I've said, even fallacious arguments are based on reason, yet f...
January 19, 2019 at 15:43
I would prefer it if you addressed what I've already said about your argument. Regarding your first premise, yes, obviously there are theists, and obv...
January 19, 2019 at 15:33
"Beyond the universe" is what we call a contradiction in terms.
January 19, 2019 at 15:21
Sorry, ignore that, I answered too quickly, and then edited my comment, but obviously not in time. Please see the edit.
January 19, 2019 at 15:02
It's just what the word means. I use the word the same way as him, as do lots of other people.
January 19, 2019 at 14:58
Ah yes, I remember how it is. You want me to do all the work. I've already provided the criticism. I don't accept it as true, no. Why wouldn't whether...
January 19, 2019 at 13:28
An error's an error. A good argument should contain premises which can be clearly understood. Your meaning wasn't made clear until many pages later. Y...
January 19, 2019 at 13:13
:up:
January 19, 2019 at 12:48
Finally, a concession. It would've been nice if you'd have realised your error sooner, but hey ho. Late is better than never.
January 19, 2019 at 12:43
No, there are other ways. I've argued that it can't possibly be true in combination with your other premise which contradicts it. It's also possible t...
January 19, 2019 at 10:38
Yep.
January 19, 2019 at 10:18
But both can't be true. So your argument isn't sound. P3 and P4 render your argument necessarily unsound.
January 19, 2019 at 08:43
I'm not disputing what counts as a subject and what counts as a predicate there. I'm just saying that, based on how I use those terms, deviations from...
January 18, 2019 at 18:37
Hey! Do you mind? We're trying to talk about God here? :lol: Anyway, a consensus is intersubjective. And I wasn't calling that fictional. I was callin...
January 18, 2019 at 18:22
No, I would just say that it's either a fact that God is, or it's a fact that God is not. And the issue as a whole, i.e. whether or not God exists, is...
January 18, 2019 at 17:56
No, I find that confusing. Given that, whether the result will be a head or a tail is a matter of fact, and whether God is or God is not is a matter o...
January 18, 2019 at 16:57
Yes, it helps clarify that you and I use the phrase "matter of fact" differently. But then, I knew that from the start. By my book, you're breaking th...
January 18, 2019 at 16:48
Those statements are inconsistent.
January 18, 2019 at 16:31
What do you think of my take on the argument? P2 and P3 cannot both be true unless an additional premise stating that whether or not God exists is not...
January 18, 2019 at 16:14
Ah! I see. You were talking about abstract thinking, whereas I was talking about abstract thinking. :meh:
January 18, 2019 at 15:53
In: Brexit  — view comment
Well, I agree with your first sentence, and like I said, a No Deal Brexit is the worst case scenario, so yes, revoke Article 50 if it's a last resort ...
January 18, 2019 at 13:59
He didn't actually answer the question in his last reply, did he? I suspect that you were right with the, "Leave Britney alone!", sort of meaning. An ...
January 18, 2019 at 13:48
Person A: "Hey, here's a reasonable argument". *presents argument* Person B: "So, do you think that I should find this argument to be reasonable?". Pe...
January 18, 2019 at 13:37
Well that's disingenuous. I've defined what a fact is, I've explained what a fact is, multiple times, as the evidence of this discussion shows, and I'...
January 18, 2019 at 13:20
I could've sworn that you've been trying to argue that theism is a reasonable belief. And if so, I think it's implied that you're effectively "asking"...
January 18, 2019 at 12:46
It was just a hypothetical. I wasn't saying that they actually would improve your life. That's not another way to be rational with regards to truth or...
January 18, 2019 at 08:22
In: Brexit  — view comment
Unfortunately, the exotic spresm that is Brexit can't be unspressed without consequence.
January 18, 2019 at 02:48
You said that it's reasonable to believe what improves your life. If so, and if your aim is to be reasonable, then none of those pesky details matter....
January 18, 2019 at 02:39
That it doesn't depend on what you wish were the case. And if you don't believe me, then try wishing yourself a teleportation device and use it to mee...
January 18, 2019 at 02:14
My cat. She isn't very intelligent, she can't speak any English, she sleeps through much of the day, and she shits in a litter tray, but she would sti...
January 18, 2019 at 02:03