You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

For the record, here is what I said earlier: I don't have faith in any relevant sense here. I only have unconscious expectations for which I can't be ...
January 20, 2019 at 17:33
But you're not being charitable, so why should I put more effort in? For example, I covered the probability in relation to reason topic earlier in the...
January 20, 2019 at 17:20
This is a false equivalence. No, that's a straw man actually. It might do, it might not do. All I know here is that we don't know, and that the scient...
January 20, 2019 at 17:13
I was expecting Metaphysician Undercover to simply define or assert or include in the concept the necessity of the existence of God, because that's wh...
January 20, 2019 at 16:57
Sure, we're not really disagreeing here. There would be a problem if you have no additional justified reason relating to soundness, which is what I ex...
January 20, 2019 at 16:53
I don't think he's too great when it comes to logic. He did acknowledge in my exchange with him that they share the same logical form, but with you he...
January 20, 2019 at 16:42
Exactly, that's what mention of the singularity is getting at. For that reason, we don't know, but some people are deluded otherwise. And no, science ...
January 20, 2019 at 16:37
The problem is that you can use the logical form to do just about anything, which really means that it does nothing. If you say that the universe nece...
January 20, 2019 at 16:25
There is no relevant difference. The reasoning is of the same logical form. He'll just say that with his argument, it's true, and with yours, it's not...
January 20, 2019 at 15:27
In: Brexit  — view comment
That's a separate issue. I am not required to explain that. It is known that the UK does receive substantial economic value from our relationship with...
January 20, 2019 at 15:15
In: Brexit  — view comment
You must have a short memory. Perhaps a look back through the pages of this discussion will refresh it.
January 20, 2019 at 15:02
In: Brexit  — view comment
Right on cue! :clap:
January 20, 2019 at 14:58
In: Brexit  — view comment
Nice try. Maybe leave the goading to the experts. I'm not challenging any facts. I'm challenging your evaluation of them. And I've already been there,...
January 20, 2019 at 14:42
I have a hunch that you're going to keep failing to realise that your reasoning can be used against you, and is thus ineffective. We're still in that ...
January 20, 2019 at 14:32
In: Brexit  — view comment
You're wrong on that point, as I've also argued throughout this discussion. The referendum was indeed democratic, and not only was it democratic, if i...
January 20, 2019 at 14:15
In: Brexit  — view comment
We'll still have our democracy though, so your premise is flawed. It's far from ideal that we've got ourselves in such a mess that one possible resolu...
January 20, 2019 at 13:57
In: Wisdom  — view comment
Ten. And that's just the last hour. But it's alright, fortunately I have all of the right answers, so I know my limits.
January 20, 2019 at 13:45
I think what Terrapin was saying is that, since there is logic which demonstrates that if there are experiences, then there is necessarily a universe ...
January 20, 2019 at 13:38
Fuck it, let's continue. Now, one argument from him I've seen is that God is necessary as an answer because atheistic answers are ruled out. But by hi...
January 20, 2019 at 13:28
Come on now, guys. Allow him some respite. There's only so much criticism he can take before his coping mechanism kicks in.
January 20, 2019 at 13:21
In: Brexit  — view comment
But we agree that it's nonsense either way, so let's not quibble over what kind of nonsense it is.
January 20, 2019 at 13:10
In: Brexit  — view comment
I was talking about your reference to a "progression of mindless pro-Brexit nonsense". Speak of the Devil... :lol:
January 20, 2019 at 13:02
In: Brexit  — view comment
You must be referring to Inis's posts. If you think that this is bad, you should see his posts in the Trump discussion.
January 20, 2019 at 12:58
In: Brexit  — view comment
You're right. I just can't think of any other examples of clever and qualified politicians whose plans have backfired. Is that even possible? It must ...
January 20, 2019 at 12:44
I'm also going to invent a clever literary device I'll name a "callback". I've already sent the request for a patent. Just you wait...
January 20, 2019 at 12:23
In: Wisdom  — view comment
What do you think it's short for? Wait, don't answer that.
January 20, 2019 at 12:14
:grin: :up:
January 20, 2019 at 12:13
I'm going to write a book that no one will read about a mischievous young man - an anti-hero of sorts - who tries his very best to restrain himself fr...
January 20, 2019 at 12:02
I chickened out and cheated! :lol: Instead of continuing to try to complete the game, I gave up and just watched a YouTube video of someone else compl...
January 20, 2019 at 11:54
Brilliant. I say embrace the absurdity. Do it for the lulz. But if it gets too much, maybe try hard to force yourself away for a while. It's more fun ...
January 20, 2019 at 11:01
Yes, I agree. I'm convinced that, in truth, it boils down to an emotional yearning. Underneath it all is the Sky Daddy, the Holy Coping Mechanism. Wha...
January 20, 2019 at 10:37
Leave Britney alone! Stop being so critical! She can shave off all of her hair and attack people with an umbrella if she wants to! I just can't come u...
January 20, 2019 at 10:25
In: Brexit  — view comment
Grab your tin foil hats, folks! (It's incompetence, not conspiracy. You're giving Cameron & Co. too much credit).
January 20, 2019 at 10:13
In: Brexit  — view comment
Yes, she does a very amusing wiggle to the tune of 'Dancing Queen'. :rofl:
January 20, 2019 at 10:05
In: Brexit  — view comment
Yes, regarding a no-deal, I'm actually looking forward to the "I told ya so!" moment. But if it ends up being another scenario like the last president...
January 20, 2019 at 09:42
Yeah, who is this "we"? The name I give the concept is, "You're a fool if you believe that I have an actually existing referent". Granted, that's a bi...
January 20, 2019 at 09:30
Here's the problem: that's not an argument against atheism, or agnosticism if you prefer. It's just an argument against one possible atheistic positio...
January 20, 2019 at 09:16
You're right, I should be more level-headed, like you, and believe in a timeless, spaceless, eternal, conscious, immaterial, transcendent, yakety yak ...
January 19, 2019 at 22:35
Does that mean I can do my victory dance?
January 19, 2019 at 22:21
That's merely based on an "if", so it's no refutation. Back to the drawing board you go. Sure, I'm the one who's making bald assertions and saying stu...
January 19, 2019 at 22:13
You haven't provided anything that I accept to be a justification for what would otherwise be special pleading, and I explain why I don't accept your ...
January 19, 2019 at 21:52
No it isn't, and that's a false dichotomy. What about there's no known reason? I have, so I interpret that as a request to needlessly repeat myself, w...
January 19, 2019 at 21:18
Yes. So God's a concept? But wait, God can't be, that wouldn't make sense. So God's a special exception? But wait, there's no justification for that. ...
January 19, 2019 at 21:12
What is this magic of which you speak? :lol:
January 19, 2019 at 20:56
That's not a justification, because atheism doesn't posit a universe-by-magic, and your supposed alternative possibility to atheism is implausible and...
January 19, 2019 at 20:46
Indeed. Most things about the universe and the stuff that makes it up have explanations, or we think that there's an unknown explanation, or we think ...
January 19, 2019 at 20:41
Correct, it being a dodge makes it a dodge. If you expect people to reasonably believe that this supposed alternative possibility is plausible, then y...
January 19, 2019 at 20:32
That's a dodge. If you expect people to reasonably believe that this supposed alternative possibility is plausible, then you must justify what appears...
January 19, 2019 at 20:20
And, on the face of it, that makes sense. If there were no universe, would there be timeless and immaterial things? I think that most people would thi...
January 19, 2019 at 20:13
The only "things" I know of which could possibly qualify as having those attributes are concepts. If you're going to suggest that God is not a concept...
January 19, 2019 at 20:06