You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

TheMadFool

Comments

I'm not sure but the word "prove" seems to encompass both the rigor of deduction and the uncertainties of induction and abduction. Your objection seem...
June 18, 2021 at 08:53
It must've come up in the preceding discussions but here's what I like about science. There's an almost obsessive desire to legitimize one's work by g...
June 18, 2021 at 06:40
@"Amalac" Now I get it. Apologies if I've hampered the discussion. Sextus Empiricus seems to be saying this: 1. If Socrates died then either Socrates ...
June 18, 2021 at 05:56
Excuse me! In my defense, the current mathematical, scientific and neuroscientific paradigms can't seem to be able to get the study of consciousness o...
June 18, 2021 at 03:07
Sextus Empiricus' argument is vacuous if he states that Socrates died twice is entailed by it. Died twice implies he already died once and the ball is...
June 18, 2021 at 02:30
Could Sextus Empericus kindly expand and elaborate on the "died twice" bit please. Oh, wait! Sextus Empiricus is dead!
June 17, 2021 at 14:09
You read my mind! :up: If I may be allowed some further speculation, the mind seems to be capable of so much more than we give it credit for. The "......
June 17, 2021 at 14:07
Be the smart one! Abstain!
June 17, 2021 at 12:31
https://youtu.be/C3J1AO9z0tA
June 17, 2021 at 12:28
So he died once before! Problem solved! If Sextum Empiricus claims that he died once before, necessarily to have died twice, then Sextus Empircus has ...
June 17, 2021 at 11:14
Where's the inconsistency? Hmmmm...Lemme think about it. Let's start with the definition of physicalism: everything is matter and energy. Secondly, So...
June 17, 2021 at 11:12
Thanks for being so understanding! G'day.
June 17, 2021 at 08:46
Sorry, can't access those files. Corrupted sectors as per self-diagnostic reports. Will get back to you if I can recover those files. Until then, you'...
June 17, 2021 at 08:41
Good question! For starters, physical/bodily death is considered final in the sense if I were to die today, that would be the end of TheMadFool and no...
June 17, 2021 at 08:38
We crossed that bridge. We're on the same page although it's still debatable whether ideas are thoughts or not. They (ideas) survive death. That's the...
June 17, 2021 at 06:51
I see a very interesting argument emerging from the debate between 3017amen and 180 Proof. Foghorn beat me to it, all I can offer is my own two cents....
June 17, 2021 at 06:46
I'm afraid it is. You made a boo-boo, thoughts, ideas to be specific, survive physical death!
June 17, 2021 at 06:16
Well, Socrates is physically nonexistent but here's an idea of his that exists,
June 17, 2021 at 06:13
So, ideas are physical AND ideas can survive death? I agree to one conjunct but not the other. Which one you already know and I'm curious to know how ...
June 17, 2021 at 06:03
Thanks. Look again!
June 17, 2021 at 05:58
Last I checked, it had something to do with a blight. The Malthusian specter seems to, well, take such contingencies, in its stride so to speak i.e. t...
June 17, 2021 at 04:34
I did consider that angle. Maybe we're missing something very important. Suppose we do manage to discover the mathematical formula for consciousness b...
June 17, 2021 at 03:05
The short answer (to your questions): I don't know. The long answer: I'm working with the hypothesis that consciousness is some kind of pattern, to ta...
June 17, 2021 at 02:13
One word: Frenemy Our dear ol' momma earth has h. sapiens as a frenemy. It's humans who've opened up Pandora's box from which all sorts of planet-kill...
June 17, 2021 at 01:51
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
I'm out!
June 17, 2021 at 01:24
What can I say that hasn't already been assumed in IIT? My last liaison with math was in high school. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that consciousnes...
June 17, 2021 at 01:24
What would that look like? Nuances as in...? Let's do some back of the envelope calculations. 1. 100% of the mass of food gets converted to mass of th...
June 17, 2021 at 00:55
It's a tightrope walk. On one side is obsequiousness (low self-esteem) and on the other side is hubris (high self-esteem). Both ain't good for you but...
June 17, 2021 at 00:22
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
A work in progress. Sorry if it messes up the discourse. Agreed but you might want to take a closer look at the appropriateness of the word "arbitrary...
June 16, 2021 at 23:08
My thoughts exactly. Just the other day, I was wondering if nonphysicalists would be ready to accept souls/minds as pure energy or some kind of mathem...
June 16, 2021 at 11:20
You obviously haven't been introduced to Deus Deceptor (Descartes), Simulation Hypothesis (Nick Bostrom), and Brain In A Vat (Gilbert Harman), Solipsi...
June 16, 2021 at 11:15
My take on the materialism-idealism debate crystallized into a high-definition image about a month or so ago. A bit of an exaggeration there but who's...
June 16, 2021 at 10:34
So, I got it backwards. :rofl: Good to know. :up:
June 16, 2021 at 08:34
Sorry to hear that! I'm sure the pay-offs will make up for the time lost consumed. I didn't imply that though it looks like I said it. Sorry for the c...
June 16, 2021 at 08:31
The word "author" seems to have broadened its scope over the last 5 centueries - it used to refer to writers but now its meaning is closer to creator ...
June 16, 2021 at 06:48
:up: I like that attitude. Life is so much simpler that way! The question is, is it the truth? That said, I don't like the fact that science was chose...
June 16, 2021 at 06:21
Yes, we can agree on something at least! That's an attitude I don't recommend - it would be like mistaking a stop in your journey with your destinatio...
June 16, 2021 at 06:03
Hate to break it to you but no, you wouldn't! Sorry! Are you saying a chimpanzee society is equivalent to human society in re morality? Let's set asid...
June 16, 2021 at 05:27
A = A is false must necessarily be a conversation stopper...awkward pause.
June 16, 2021 at 05:18
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
I've already conceded to the point that virtue ethics is normative ethics and that the Euthyphro dilemma is metaethical one but you're ignoring the ob...
June 16, 2021 at 05:16
You would know, right? That's an explanation but I'm sure you wouldn't go so far as to say that's the explanation, no? Morality, if you haven't alread...
June 16, 2021 at 05:09
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
That's exactly what I said, right? Every ethical theory brings with it its own brand of goodness.
June 16, 2021 at 04:39
Well said! Nevertheless, there are people, like me for example, who can't help but judge matters based on our own weltanschaunngs. I feel that's what ...
June 16, 2021 at 04:38
You know your history well! Kudos to you. As for me, my memory ain't what it used to be. Just out of curiosoty, do you like the modernism-postmodernis...
June 16, 2021 at 03:53
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Normative ethics question: Is there good/bad in virtue ethics? Answer: Of course there is, that's why it's an ethical theory i.e. it's supposed to gui...
June 16, 2021 at 03:36
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Agreed but it must have a metaethics of its own i.e. it should have some criteria for distinguishing good from bad. In short, that we have virtue ethi...
June 16, 2021 at 03:14
Short & sweet! Just what the doctor ordered (for me). :up: Thanks So, the modern period describes the first step taken by humanity in the domain of sc...
June 16, 2021 at 02:54
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Sorry to break it to you but you saying it doesn't make it wrong. You began by telling me the Euthyphro dilemma is metaethics and virture ethics is no...
June 16, 2021 at 02:39
Oh! If that's how you're going to come at the issue, no problemo! Whatever floats your boat. G'day!
June 16, 2021 at 02:30
Whaddaya mean? The Malthusian Trap
June 15, 2021 at 18:38