You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

TheMadFool

Comments

I think 4 doesn't follow. Consider two lines AB = 2 cm and CD = 4 cm Divide these lines i.e. find points on these lines by dividing them with k 1. k =...
December 19, 2019 at 13:53
That unexpected events occur isn't an explanation for the issue I raised but... I underlined the part that made sense to me. It squares with my explan...
December 19, 2019 at 13:14
What were Aristotle's objections to points being zero-dimensional? I don't get this part. Are you saying that because there are an infinity of points ...
December 19, 2019 at 12:31
I'm not saying a given outcome(s) is/are impossible. Perhaps I don't see the relevance of what you're saying to what is a actually bothering me. Kindl...
December 19, 2019 at 09:56
Correct. I wonder how one differentiates the true random from pesudorandom?
December 19, 2019 at 07:34
I don't or rather can't practice what I preach :confused:
December 19, 2019 at 06:03
I'd like to continue the discussion if you don't mind because I see what you mean but I feel, given that mathematicians don't make a fuss about points...
December 19, 2019 at 06:02
Thanks. I get it, more or less.
December 19, 2019 at 05:30
:smile: :up: If there's a hidden message in there I didn't see it
December 19, 2019 at 05:28
This is exactly what bothers me. It should be possible to bias the experiment towards a particular outcome. Yet this doesn't happen and the die behave...
December 19, 2019 at 05:27
Because... we can introduce randomness or more accurately pseudo-randomness into a deterministic system.
December 19, 2019 at 05:21
We agree on the point that the outcome depends on and can be predicted by the initial state of the die. The rest of what you said depends on this and ...
December 18, 2019 at 16:26
If it's as you claim, all in my head, how does the die know to come up three 1/6 of the time? Is the die sentient and after finding out I don't have t...
December 18, 2019 at 15:03
How does my ignorance cause the die to become random? Separately, I must ask you this: Are all random and chance events caused by our ignorance?
December 18, 2019 at 14:30
You seem to be saying that probability = ignorance but that would imply that there is no such thing as randomness or even chance. If that's the case t...
December 18, 2019 at 14:09
I just read a very simplified version of the law of large numbers which asserts that as the number of probability experiments increases, the results o...
December 18, 2019 at 14:00
I wonder what political science has to comment about politics in science now that everything under the sun seems to be in the race to achieve scientif...
December 18, 2019 at 12:36
:ok: :100:
December 18, 2019 at 12:09
This is what I want to discuss if you don't mind and thanks for your effort in trying to make me understand. We have to revisit our assumptions: 1. Ei...
December 18, 2019 at 12:06
That there is a blurring of distinctions doesn't necessarily imply the absence of distinction. To think so would be to slide down the slippery slope f...
December 18, 2019 at 10:53
Thanks for your patience. I don't think I've "discovered" anything. My question is more a reflection of my fundamental misconceptions on a subject, he...
December 18, 2019 at 09:54
One thing is for sure, we, all "higher" animals in fact, have specialized and dedicated organs for sound, our ears and that too as a pair. To the cont...
December 18, 2019 at 09:34
You quoted me out of context. Thanks anyway.
December 18, 2019 at 08:20
Wittgenstein's argument: 1. Meanings are of two types: a. Meaning as use b. Meaning through mental imagery and pointing out 2. Meaning type b involves...
December 18, 2019 at 08:18
:up: :up: to all
December 18, 2019 at 03:40
:ok: :up:
December 18, 2019 at 03:40
The only "explanation" I can offer is: Consider a line of length 1 unit extending from 0 to 1.It can be repeatedly halved by multiplying with 1/2 Each...
December 18, 2019 at 03:39
Can you have a look at what I said below. It seems wrong and right. Consider two infinite sets A and B of equal cardinality i.e. n(A) = n(B) = infinit...
December 18, 2019 at 03:20
What do you mean by insight? If it (insight) complies with the lexical meaning then I think it's a product of clear, deliberate and focused thought. H...
December 18, 2019 at 02:06
Sorry for the long delay in my response but I was waiting for an epiphany of sorts. My mind just drew a blank so I'm going to work at this problem fro...
December 18, 2019 at 01:11
:ok: Thanks.
December 17, 2019 at 20:22
It appears to me that there are two types of contradictions: 1. The obvious one that goes (p & ~p) in which the two statements of the conjunction have...
December 17, 2019 at 20:17
I read a little of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on the topic. It seems that Aristotle thought of an actual infinity to be akin to t...
December 17, 2019 at 13:42
Thanks for the reply. I understand that another definition for an infinite set is a set that is equivalent (bijection possible) to a proper subset of ...
December 17, 2019 at 13:23
What about people praying for world peace or a cure for cancer or the like. These are unequivocally aligned with the overall good of the world and yet...
December 17, 2019 at 11:10
I did a cursory reading of Euclid's definition of a point: "that which has no parts" which I suspect alludes to points being zero dimensional. The usu...
December 17, 2019 at 10:11
I was expecting Heisenberg's uncertainty principle but you forget that predictability is about aggregates of particles and not individual particles. T...
December 17, 2019 at 09:41
I think @"fishfry" said something to the effect that bijection has precedence of injection. Why? I think @"quickly" understood my argument but s/he st...
December 17, 2019 at 09:35
Thanks for bearing with my stubbornness but have a look at what I say below: A = {x, y, z} B = {r, s, t} and C = {l, m} Cantor got it right if his cla...
December 16, 2019 at 16:57
Do you suppose there's a reason why points are zero-dimensional? How would we define distance? The beginning/end of one point to the beginning/end of ...
December 16, 2019 at 13:57
God --- All good --- All knowing --- All powerful 1*.------------Yes------------Yes-----------------Yes 2.--------------Yes------------Yes------------...
December 16, 2019 at 08:29
:chin:
December 16, 2019 at 03:56
I'm not disagreeing with you. The modern world has been aptly described as the information age. I was just wondering about the pockets of zero informa...
December 16, 2019 at 03:42
What this post is a reply to was my "explanation". I think mass and what happens to mass, motion is predictable and mass isn't affected by quantum wei...
December 16, 2019 at 03:28
Amazingly, if you haven't already noticed, there is a rather inexplicable absence of information in things that matter the most: 1. Meaning of life 2....
December 15, 2019 at 13:05
What lies beyond the boundary of "finite" space? Can an infinite space not expand? Imagine three galaxies in infinite space A, B, and C. Suppose the d...
December 15, 2019 at 12:44
This has bothered me since you first brought it up not a while ago. I'm not a mathematician but 1 here is a length and when you divide a length you do...
December 15, 2019 at 12:36
Well, perhaps it's an issue of viewpoint. Predictability, where it's exhibited (the macro world), is "always" about mass, velocity, acceleration, volu...
December 15, 2019 at 10:58
I find the notion of irreducible complexity very similar to that of missing links - transitional fossils. Assuming evolution progressed from simplicit...
December 15, 2019 at 10:13
His claim is that an actual infinity is impossible. One way to make sense of that would be the problem of completing supertasks. That's all.
December 13, 2019 at 09:37