You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

TheMadFool

Comments

Indeed, I agree with you although I wonder if there'll be any avenues for positive change in a system that seems specifically designed to cause catast...
September 12, 2020 at 04:58
:smile: Who's not dying?
September 11, 2020 at 15:54
In: Oil  — view comment
What do you make of this: Sun's Activity Increased In Past Century A quote: Modern Maximum
September 11, 2020 at 13:15
Proof is the act of making explicit the necessary connection between the truth of some propositions (the premises) and one other proposition (the conc...
September 11, 2020 at 11:18
Again, my previous reply was not up to mark. There are two things to consider: 1. The definition of truth as a correspondence between reality and the ...
September 11, 2020 at 10:40
Sorry for the multiple posts but my last reply to this comment was inadequate. First, you agree that if a given set of propositions, cal it S, is inco...
September 11, 2020 at 10:15
Your description of consistency is correct. All that's essential is that some possible world exist where all propositions being considered are true. Y...
September 11, 2020 at 09:24
A great question as far as I'm concerned. Reminds me of @"Metaphysician Undercover"'s thread on coherentism. Surely, if every room in Hilbert's hotel ...
September 11, 2020 at 06:46
Firstly, I agree that the meaning of words change with time but I disagree that the right meaning will be arbitrary. The first time a word is used is ...
September 10, 2020 at 10:53
:lol:
September 10, 2020 at 09:56
:up: :ok:
September 10, 2020 at 09:30
Re-read my post. It'll make sense.
September 10, 2020 at 09:28
Sorry, if I didn't pay due attention to this but it looks like you're committing the same mistake as Wittgenstein, taking all usages of a word as corr...
September 10, 2020 at 09:16
:chin:
September 10, 2020 at 09:11
I have no preconceptions on the matter. I saw a problem - the idea of language games, Wittgenstein's, it's implication that some words are undefiniabl...
September 10, 2020 at 08:12
Aren't we all like the guy who was working on a syllogism? Is life not a journey, a spaceflight? Don't we all put off thinking about death until it's ...
September 10, 2020 at 07:07
Metaphorically? I think literally. God loves us all, equally. This is what bothers me a lot. What's the problem with all things having equal value? By...
September 10, 2020 at 06:43
Can you elaborate on this point. What exactly do you mean by inequality must exist for value? I agree but you need to clarify the exact relationship b...
September 10, 2020 at 06:28
That only explains the fact that people are more willing to listen longer if the message is interesting. The desire to listen longer is directly propo...
September 10, 2020 at 05:57
If "can =/= must" then, on what grounds are you making the claim that just because not having sex is a denial of life that pro-lifers must engage in s...
September 10, 2020 at 05:49
The idea behind consistency appears to be simple. Consistency ensures that, there exists a possible world in which all propositions for a given belief...
September 10, 2020 at 05:29
Gradualism
September 09, 2020 at 16:43
Just wanted to share a few other observations: There's another type of coherence and it, more or less, falls under the rubric of abductive reasoning -...
September 09, 2020 at 16:41
Well, if one is to maintain that some form of inequality must exist for value to have meaning then be ready to be discriminated against or, far worse,...
September 09, 2020 at 16:19
I agree it's not the official position of the Church but it follows, without the need for anything additional, from God's omnibenevolence - you can't ...
September 09, 2020 at 13:43
To my understanding, only truths matter - there's no sense in knowing falsehoods; after all, falsehoods are a liability rather than an asset unless, o...
September 09, 2020 at 12:42
:smile: Your sarcasm is not lost on me. Just tell me where I made a mistake.
September 09, 2020 at 11:52
Why is it impossible to maintain what you refer to as "absolute skepticism"? If anything I'm trying not to confuse dreams with the real deal. Look, yo...
September 09, 2020 at 10:58
Well, take the classic example Wittgenstein uses, the word "game". It, according to him, applies to many objects but, if we try to find a common threa...
September 09, 2020 at 10:16
I wouldn't go so far as to say that. However, his language game concept doesn't hold water because it depends on every use of a word being correct. Th...
September 09, 2020 at 09:07
Well, it's not impossible to relax the rules every now and then to make an idea or a theory more digestible but where are you going to draw the line b...
September 09, 2020 at 08:44
Au contraire, it makes life all the more mysterious ergo, vastly more interesting than otherwise. I believe, not from personal experience though, that...
September 09, 2020 at 06:11
I'm not "sneaking" that in. I'm making it explicit. If you disagree be ready to end up as a meal on an alien's dinner plate; after all, an alien may b...
September 09, 2020 at 06:07
:rofl: Sorry but you could be charitable instead of disparaging. After all, according to you, I'm not playing with a full deck.
September 09, 2020 at 05:56
My position on the matter is irrelevant because I'm not claiming that the world is or is not a simulation. Frankly, I don't know and, in fact, nobody ...
September 09, 2020 at 05:54
:smile: But why?
September 09, 2020 at 05:47
As I mentioned in my OP, the subtler the difference between the actual definition of "chair" and an object, the more likely it is that people will tur...
September 09, 2020 at 04:50
:up:
September 08, 2020 at 16:49
Yes, but only, as you agree, in "ordinary" language but language is a bona fide philosophical subject and we bring the tools of philsophy to bear on "...
September 08, 2020 at 16:48
Personhood is irrelevant in the sense there never is a person or irrelevant in the sense that there always was a person?
September 08, 2020 at 16:24
:rofl: So goats have amplitudes and thoughts are red? Perhaps a more familiar example will clarify it for you: colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
September 08, 2020 at 16:20
There's the problem and you recgonize it but only, it seems, subconsciously."Widely accepted" meaning misses the mark in philosophy or so I hear. This...
September 08, 2020 at 16:15
The goat has an amplitude of red thoughts. What's wrong with the preceding sentence?
September 08, 2020 at 16:11
As it stands, the word "chair" is applied to various objects but what's missing is a unifying essence in these objects and that's bound to lead to con...
September 08, 2020 at 16:03
Misusing words i.e. applying them to objects that don't satisfy definitions and not applying them to objects that do fuflill definitions results in co...
September 08, 2020 at 15:43
I want to ask you a simple question: Do you know, for certain, that this world, your waking world, is real and not a simulation?
September 08, 2020 at 15:37
To the extent that it matters in this discussion, pillars are what holds up morality - in essence enabling the very idea of what goodness is to exist....
September 08, 2020 at 15:35
I see. I also see you haven't answered any of my questions on Wittgenstein's philosphy. Perhaps you were too busy. Let me ask you again. What does Wit...
September 08, 2020 at 15:10
Possible, very possible. Perhaps you can help me. What is a language game, a family resemblance, form of life, etc.? I wouldn't, at this moment, touch...
September 08, 2020 at 13:43
Do you realize that you're dreaming when dreaming? No. The waking world is assuredly different from the dream world both in the sense that our minds a...
September 08, 2020 at 08:41