Yet, "Ukraine never had the ability to launch those missiles or to use those warheads. The security measures against unauthorized use were under Mosco...
You didn't provide any evidence to support these claims. I have evidences that question them. Indeed Turkic people may be genetically very different f...
Putin sees no threat from NATO expansion, warns against military build-up :chin: source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-calls-finland-swe...
The more I read anti-NATO imperialism supporters the more I feel like becoming a NATO imperialist supporter: Putin's self-fulfilling prophecy about NA...
Meanwhile, in a popular Russian talk show, retired Russian Col. Mikhail Khodaryonok gives his grim assessment of Russia's war in Ukraine: https://www....
Since we are part of a philosophy forum debate not an ordinary political debate, I don't think that discussing with Nazis about their views is a way t...
Dude, I quoted you not only Wikipedia but ethnogenesis studies on the Crimean Tatars, that prove Crimean Tatars' origins were pre-Mongol. And also spe...
The problem is not just the American reluctance to seat at the negotiation table (they might prefer to wait until they have Sweden and Finland joining...
What?! Why on earth are you talking about Mongols?! Crimean Tatars are indigenous to Crimea, they are NOT Mongols! “The Crimean Tatars were formed as ...
Still rofling, dude?! Still chopping conveniently my quotes to suggest claims I never made?! Still countering objections I never raised, nor implied, ...
Oh pls, can I be a CIA-NATO bot transformer? But I never said you said it MUST! I just questioned your claim that Crimea belongs to Russia. Anyway acc...
In favor of Russia, I can only say that as long as there is no plausible prospective of re-integrating Russia in the world economy, while addressing i...
02.01.2005 Interview with Sergej Lavrov by the German business newspaper Handelsblatt: https://amp2.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/handelsblat...
My incoherent rant?! If I find Zelensky credible but you don’t, and Zelensky has never claimed that “Crimea belongs to Russia”, once more, why on eart...
Dude, if I never called you “deranged Putinist”, there are reasons: the main is that your dialectic approach is the problem, not the content. You woul...
Of course, if you say so and rofl about it, it MUST be certainly true then! :rofl: Ditto, to a deranged mind, I can seem lots of things. Which straw m...
All right, I see some good points in there, so I welcome your input. Yet I'm not here to entertain other people, besides this is a philosophical forum...
As for (1) you didn’t show me that I misunderstood you before I showed you that you did misunderstand me, and repeatedly so. Therefore it’s you who ne...
Yet it proves that yours was a straw man argument based on a misinterpreted bit of what I wrote. Completely failed?! How so? I usually don’t even try ...
I’m responsible for what I write not for what you understand. First of all, I didn’t focus on the nuclear threat per se. What I said was more articula...
Dude, whether Russia is a security threat to Ukraine or not, is for Ukraine to decide. Sure you do with your propaganda. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austi...
I didn't see Kiev, Paris, London or New York invading Russia either. Yet Russia was considering Ukraine joining NATO and EU as an existential threat t...
Where have I suggested that you suggested it? You wrote: "So in all fairness it's the combination of two nuclear parties that compete for influence, o...
Not as unfortunate as if we were aligned with Russia: we needed NATO to protect us from the Soviet Union as much as Ukraine needed NATO to protect the...
Dude, Russia is a direct existential threat to the West (primarily to the EU), given its nuclear arsenal and related repeated threats, its political i...
As I said: "I don’t give a shit about your arguments from authority and your raving about 'reason'". So I dealt with claims and arguments of yours I f...
Dude, I don’t give a shit about your arguments from authority and your raving about "reason". Suck it up and move on. You are confused. I argued that:...
That’s at best evidence to you not to me, since that all “events have causes” is not self-evident to me for logic and semantic “reasons” as I clarifie...
Nuclear war is 'most probable outcome', viewers are told, 'but we will go to heaven while they simply croak' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...
Dude you are twice delusional. I never claimed that cause must precede its effect. Instead I explicitly argued for the simultaneous co-existence of ca...
I didn't claim that, nor implied that, nor suggested that. I took into consideration the notion of "God" when talking about existence preservation, no...
Why does "popping into existence" without cause is incoherent?! There is no logical inconsistency in claiming that something does not exist at t1 but ...
Why not? As you said, Putin has figured all out, already. He will win anyways. And his people will support any leader who proves how powerful Russia i...
If "the only feasible retaliation available to Russia" is using tactical nuclear weapons then Putin should use them as soon as possible. Actually it's...
If they simultaneously exist, there is no bringing into existence from non-existence (as creation is normally understood) but at best preserving into ...
No, that's not true. If self-creation is understood as a form of simultaneous causation then the same entity X would be simultaneously existent (as ef...
Again, I would distinguish between what is the case (metaphysical question) and what we can "see" (epistemological question). Anyway the notion of "po...
As far as I can tell from my philosophical readings, events are temporal phenomena that can be extended or instantaneous: parties, watching movies, pl...
We should distinguish epistemology from ontology. The incapacity of identifying cause and effect is not a reason to reject of the simultaneity of caus...
Simultaneous causation is coherent. Simultaneous causation applied to self-creation no, because the same entity X would be simultaneously existent (as...
You just conceded enough to grant moral plausibility to the Ukrainian patriotic resistance against Russian criminal invasion. And if that's all I can ...
> If one is fighting against criminal aggression then one's country is immaterial. It's perfectly possible for both Ukrainians and Russians to fight a...
> It's used to describe behaviours and attitudes such as avoiding thousands more innocent people dying. Does the meaning of “moral” exclude fighting f...
Comments