You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Moliere

Comments

Sure, I agree with that. Surely you've noticed these aren't things I attend to :D I do in fact think of the implausible and controversial. Yeh, a bit ...
June 17, 2025 at 01:51
"This sentence is false" seems to fit to me, but I'm not allowed to use it. :D In a straightforward way if the LNC and LEM holds then there is nothing...
June 17, 2025 at 01:40
Well, yeah. It's right there! For sure. I find philosophy pleasurable, so even supposing the skeptic is correct I'm not a Pyrrhonic skeptic. For me I ...
June 17, 2025 at 01:33
"2+2=5" is false. There's a sense in which we have to know things about "2" and "+" and "5" and "=" and "...is false" So it seem easy to assert, witho...
June 17, 2025 at 01:27
How is it you understand the truth without falsity, though? What's this part where you're not thinking about the false, but instead -- prior to falsit...
June 17, 2025 at 01:24
Do you see how it's correct for the critic to still say that they don't know? That's what I was hoping the example to demonstrate -- they don't have t...
June 17, 2025 at 01:17
I actually wonder if that'd qualify... I'm not sure. I was more thinking insofar that we weaken our requirements for knowledge so that the skeptical p...
June 17, 2025 at 01:07
Why not? Suppose a person who is skeptical about some things existing and not skeptical about other things existing -- so not the Cartesian scenario, ...
June 17, 2025 at 01:02
That's not true. Suppose you hire someone to build you a house. You don't know how to build the house, but your criticism is important to how the buil...
June 17, 2025 at 00:56
Haha. That's what I'm trying to avoid -- it's worthwhile to note that there are definitely aesethetic differences. And something about Plato is that h...
June 17, 2025 at 00:45
Oh if you're fine with it I am. I mostly didn't want to distract from your main point but if you think it's on topic then it's on topic -- it's your O...
June 17, 2025 at 00:22
Well, categorically speaking, myth-making is part of philosophy though, right? I'd say there'd have to be some kind of "reasonable", whatever that amo...
June 17, 2025 at 00:00
I think it really could be the case that some questions' correct answer is "I don't know"; why does one need a guess to say "I don't know"? I'd say th...
June 16, 2025 at 23:56
I'd make the case that the builders need the critics -- else you get backbad arguments.
June 16, 2025 at 23:44
Yeah, it's messy in-fact. Just presuming some hedonic calculus, and supposing a belief that is false did not harm anyone then that calculus, unless fo...
June 16, 2025 at 23:42
I'm intrigued. I spend a lot of time thinking about how to think about these sorts of things -- meaningful beliefs that are false, sometimes to the po...
June 16, 2025 at 22:54
OK, now I'm guessing "she" is Oizys @"Bob Ross"
June 16, 2025 at 22:18
I can't give this constructive feedback because it was, and is perfect to me -- both/and, the past and the present and the future and the pluperfect a...
June 16, 2025 at 22:07
Wondering who "she" is throughout the essay I kept feeling compelled to want to read, which is an interesting choice. I got the sense that "she" is ph...
June 16, 2025 at 22:00
Why limit ourselves to a scheme of four possible ways to philosophize? :D It's how I see things. Close to: It is a pleasure unto itself, and this is e...
June 16, 2025 at 21:37
Alright. Sorry for the delay, work called -- but now the big reveal! Wittgenstein's Hinges and Gödel's Unprovable Statements @"Sam26" Bubbles and Styx...
June 16, 2025 at 14:28
Now that you've been revealed -- I'll say yours is one of the ones I'm struggling with to come up with a relevant reply. Excellent stuff.
June 15, 2025 at 16:13
I appreciated your essay so much because it was more than I expected -- it's a strong thesis that explains itself and causes reflection in me. I suppo...
June 15, 2025 at 14:58
(if mostly the good guys, yes) ;)
June 15, 2025 at 14:57
It's there. I PM'ed him to point out which one so that I didn't give hints.
June 15, 2025 at 13:20
Responded by PM to keep hints minimal
June 15, 2025 at 12:47
Yup, that's the one.
June 14, 2025 at 20:08
Heh, alright. Glad to hear it. It was mostly for you that I spoke up so much. I'm just trying to help people understand -- I don't care what they do a...
June 14, 2025 at 13:20
Back on track -- sorry for the divergence. Your points have been excellent. Yeh, it's not an entire fabrication -- but you know how you grow up with "...
June 14, 2025 at 07:08
Same to you, as always. :heart:
June 13, 2025 at 18:59
Maybe not. I think Hume is right with respect to the causal relation -- we think that there's a necessary relationship between events but there's not ...
June 13, 2025 at 18:55
I was thinking of know-how mainly, but yes I know he's fine with inference that's informal. The part where I think what I've said about essence matter...
June 13, 2025 at 18:49
That would solve it, you're right. But I'd rather just say I don't know when I don't know: the retort is "What if there is some third thing we missed?...
June 13, 2025 at 18:32
I had been following that discussion up to https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/992579 Sorry, missed this. I think we'd like such a thing...
June 13, 2025 at 18:06
I don't recognize that at all. I would rather make the inference that if empiricism is the only option and induction is impossible then knowledge must...
June 13, 2025 at 18:03
Yeah. I think it's fair to call him a rationalist, though a non-cognitivist -- most people don't worry about the problem of induction because they don...
June 13, 2025 at 17:58
I have sympathies, but just like I do with any other philosopher -- there's a with the grain and against the grain, and I think Kant's categories fall...
June 13, 2025 at 17:44
I'm a time-travelling AI bot -- you'll see my account comes from before ChatGPT, but the AI of the future discovered time travelling before humans did...
June 13, 2025 at 16:02
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/goldman-1869-1940/
June 13, 2025 at 15:50
Is Emma Goldman not a real world example?
June 13, 2025 at 15:39
I mean, fair enough. I'm going to base any sort of analysis based on two things: a political philosophy, and what the political actors have done. So h...
June 13, 2025 at 15:12
Eh, it's more that I think that your notion of how to look at political philosophies is flawed -- theory is important, but relying upon the meanings o...
June 13, 2025 at 14:51
:rofl: Well, it might be your problem, but for my part I'm calling the anarchists anarchists, rather than "confused about what they are saying because...
June 13, 2025 at 14:43
Then I will be in error from now until forever -- what are we to call the people who call themselves anarchists and organize anarchically and advocate...
June 13, 2025 at 14:35
There's a clear distinction that George Dickie describes which might help you as you go forward, though won't answer these questions. He notes how the...
June 13, 2025 at 00:36
I like both. As you note: Part of the joke I've been enjoying is that all I've been doing to Aristotle is Aristotle's method to Aristotle -- noting ho...
June 12, 2025 at 23:50
Not the first time for me. Though I'd pay heed to: It makes sense to not jump to a conclusion based on a story we hear, especially if we have expertis...
June 12, 2025 at 22:27
I feel terrified by it all -- they're targeting anyone they feel they can get away with, and given human nature I'm pretty sure that's not exactly goi...
June 12, 2025 at 22:19
Now mayhaps it's inevitable, but give how little attention is paid to aesthetics on the fora I thought it worth noting that the OP was asking after th...
June 12, 2025 at 21:04
Man, I just listed a couple of examples to show that there's stuff out there to research -- that question you posed is a good question, but also huge ...
June 12, 2025 at 20:33