Agreed. Can we also make space for a bit of imagination? Yes. Info overload. R-O-C-K-IN-THE-U-S-A! - Faster_smarter_better; condensed books; one-minut...
In most Western card games, the numeral 1 is designated ace and marked A accordingly. In games based on the superiority of one rank over another, such...
Yes. What you say is true. My word game here -- not generally valid -- contextualizes stipulating a rule under the super-ordination of an arbitrary go...
What you say is true. I must publicly acknowledge defeat. I will, however, quibble as an exercise in futility in the following manner: This tells us t...
Can you write a flow chart showing the continuity extending from the five products of metaphysics (you listed: {categories, paradigms, criteria, metho...
Whaddya mean you don't follow? In making my explanation, I hewed to a close replication of your definition of metaphysics. I took in your definition a...
Proceeding from the conclusion of the above quotes, it seems reasonable to understand the five terms listed as guidelines-by-example that suggest how ...
An ontically fractional electric charge is my attempt to describe an energy field that can only be accurately mathematically modeled to experimental o...
I burden T Clark with another question because he wrote this informative quote. I hope others here will weigh in with responses to my following questi...
Let me indulge in gross simplification by characterizing materialism as quantitative and idealism as qualitative. Are you saying science is hands-on m...
From your question above I surmise you reject my supposition -- elaborated above in the OP -- that 1D, 2D, 4D and all dimensional expansions not the s...
What do you make of the following interpretation of your above statement: math is the infrastructure of theoretical physics(?) Here's the definition o...
Yes. I posted mis-information that claims ontically fractional quarks. Universeness set me straight about that. It's fractional charges attached to qu...
Your statement is clarifying. Math takes us on cerebral journeys to higher dimensions. If, as I read your statement, these higher dimensions we peer a...
For clarity, let me extend the quote just a bit, Above I'm trying to ask whether quarks are ontically fractional and, if so, how does a fractional or ...
:up: You've answered my questions with useful info. Thank-you. I'm asking whether these existentially -- right? -- fractional quarks and gluons are ex...
I see your OP as being generally concerned with the natural inequality of human individuals. Touchy subject. Our constitution says all men are created...
In the first quoted paragraph, you write about subjective experience with language that assumes it is an existing (therefore real) thing. In the secon...
The above describes some important psychological traits of the winner. Self-confidence is bid as a ground of success, even to the highest levels of hu...
You've gotten hold of some important ideas here in your OP. I'm much engaged by it. Very interesting and instructive. Here you introduce what looks li...
Is your opening OP concerned with, at least in part, the subtle ways that high-tech industrial societies subvert organized opposition (specifically, o...
Rather than saying "the world is phenomena", I say "the world is noumena" and phenomena, via the agency of the brain, is a higher-order feedback loop ...
Bartricks, You ask if Christianity has a sound philosophical reason for believing God created the world. I surmise Christianity makes a metaphysical c...
I'm very grateful to you, Constance. Thank-you for you time, attention, knowledge and wisdom as applied to my thoughts about the mode of the phenomeno...
Don't confuse "easily accessible to the objectivist methodologies of science." with "easily solvable with the objectivist methodologies of science." I...
Let me call it Scientific Logos. Consider the following parallel, As a crystal chandelier is a workup (constructive metabolism) from a handful of sand...
I think the following list of your statements within this conversation support my interpretation above. In my opinion, they intend to show objectivist...
My conjecture about a complex surface with some topology of invariance assumes a unity of subjective self and observed world (of material objects) so,...
Your statement implies the belief commonplace subjective experiences should be easily accessible to the objectivist methodologies of science. It also ...
Have you perhaps made epistemic transmission problematical by conceiving of consciousness and its learning process as being predicated upon a discrete...
Your tone in your role as historian of (certain) ideas has importance because in my view you're sounding the imminent death knell of non-physicalist i...
I make no commentary upon the accuracy of your reflection. I think your reflection invokes the historian, in spite of your self-perception as non-hist...
If I can suppose my personal point of view is modulated by the collective of attributes of my brain-mind, then I have a practical explanation of my pe...
With your statements above, it's my impression you're assuming the role of historian, declaring that non-physicalist world views have entered their "l...
Are you not evading an essential problem science (unwittingly) created for itself vis-a-vis study of first person experience when it defined itself as...
(Please forgive the following apparent non sequitur) consider that S and P are bound by action-at-a- distance. Can we assume that such binding of iden...
Is brain conditioning of conscious experience similar to modulation as, for example, a parallel to frequency modulation of radio waves? Does this hypo...
…solipsism is a philosophical thought that proposes that only the self exists, and its experiences such as himself, his place in the world and his per...
You've taken your time and done a careful job of profiling, per your perceptions, my writing, its meanings and, moreover, you've detailed your inferen...
With 180 Proof > a ? ucarr > a? I'm asking you to write a description that elaborates how a ? a?, which is to say, 180 Proof's statement a gets turned...
Comments