You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

ucarr

Comments

Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas, c'est facile à voir?
February 15, 2023 at 14:52
A chilling wind blew across Manhattan that afternoon as they wheeled Malcolm out of the Audubon strapped atop a stretcher. A delay held up the departu...
February 12, 2023 at 01:43
I'm indebted to you for letting me query you in-depth. I've benefitted much from the experience. It's been an education for me. I hope we'll dialogue ...
February 11, 2023 at 19:24
Do you believe: vulnerability = vulnerable, soul = souls? com·mon sense | ?käm?n ?sens | noun good sense and sound judgment in practical matters: : a ...
February 11, 2023 at 18:39
pan·psy·chism | pan?s??kiz?m | noun the doctrine or belief that everything material, however small, has an element of individual consciousness. -- The...
February 11, 2023 at 14:54
Yeah. Likewise for me. However, when friends pressure me into going, I must admit I get entertained (thrilled) and educated. I think the director need...
February 11, 2023 at 14:40
Yes. Soul as defined in the context of my four statements connects to two essential attributes of an innate identity of a self: a) unavoidable; b) inv...
February 11, 2023 at 04:57
Okay. Abstract concepts expressed in language can never take the place of the physical reality language describes. Okay. Realism directed at physical ...
February 11, 2023 at 04:41
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/779178
February 11, 2023 at 04:08
No problem. Thanks for taking time out from your busy schedule. I'm seeking your thoughts on my four statements. This you have now done to some extent...
February 10, 2023 at 19:56
As I see it, our conversation, an interview in which you answer questions, has to date distilled five big questions: 01) What is the ground of conscio...
February 10, 2023 at 19:04
I agree with this.
February 09, 2023 at 22:47
Thanks for this. It's a clarification useful to my understanding. I'm not an essentialist. I just learned of its existence through my dialog with you,...
February 09, 2023 at 21:11
If you have some sympathy for non-essentialism, can you assess nihilism and the range of possible identities it affords humans? Being ridiculous for a...
February 09, 2023 at 18:46
No intention to convey anything fancy. I simply meant wanting to correct something believed to be immoral. If you'll accept a take on ideology in the ...
February 09, 2023 at 18:10
Yes. Although Alien has terrified me, I generally favor bold exploration into new territory, hazards notwithstanding.
February 09, 2023 at 15:42
I'm seeking your thoughts on self-sacrifice for sake of ideology. Do you accept conventional wisdom that says ideology typically contains a moral comp...
February 09, 2023 at 15:35
Is this type of thinking non-binary WRT the physical/mental binary? Is this a way of saying an analysis of the world, as it becomes viable, merges int...
February 09, 2023 at 15:26
Today's world indeed. And moreover, the fact of trivialization is not trivial.
February 09, 2023 at 02:55
Do you think this is a good thing?
February 09, 2023 at 02:48
Okay. Essence is not one of your favorite words. Other people talk about it, but such conversations have never drawn you in. What about essential? Do ...
February 09, 2023 at 02:38
Your Knowledge/knowledge couplet is metaphorically illuminating. They're like tectonic plates rubbing against each other in a perennial state of (crea...
February 08, 2023 at 17:02
Are you telling me mind is a discrete unit within a system we call world? This is a good and important clarification. Is this a way of saying, in part...
February 08, 2023 at 16:36
Yes. We need each other. However, counterbalance, equilibrium and detente are difficult. They require skill of negotiation and compromise. Philosophy ...
February 08, 2023 at 15:34
I think part of the irony of success is how it breeds discontent. After success, the terrifying question looms: "Now what?" The terror in living is ho...
February 08, 2023 at 15:28
You've been giving me some clear and meaningful answers. I appreciate your candor. Your thinking on these issues is helping me with my thinking about ...
February 08, 2023 at 14:40
If you were tasked with putting words to such a cry for help, what words would you use?
February 08, 2023 at 03:09
Are you rejecting soul in favor of other words you regard as more appropriate labels for perishable human identity such as: mortal, frail, fragile, de...
February 08, 2023 at 03:07
Newtonian physics in the wake of Relativity. I acknowledge the truth of your above distinction. I think one useful measurement of the difference betwe...
February 07, 2023 at 18:24
Is it your belief that human mind and physical world enact and maintain an ecological handshake? Do human mind and physical world create together a Ve...
February 07, 2023 at 15:27
In my earlier response to you I was referring to a person's moral or emotional nature or sense of identity Let's look at numbers, morals, the human br...
February 07, 2023 at 14:31
Heart -- Remember how you told your best pal Marty in high school that Ruthie was your dream girl in this momentary lapse to insanity you even divulge...
February 07, 2023 at 05:27
Soul is the part of you that truly believes Soul-belief comes to children naturally After childhood it threatens to slip our grasp Soul is the heart o...
February 07, 2023 at 02:32
Only the contents of your mind hold the status of knowledge? Everything external to your mind holds the status of belief? Is your belief Justified Tru...
February 06, 2023 at 18:40
Does the context in which the {observation ? analysis ? conclusion} unfolds play a critical role in the scope of the truth content of the JTB? Can we ...
February 06, 2023 at 15:45
You have concluded our world is mind-independent?
February 06, 2023 at 15:03
Let's revisit a couple of my communications. When a philosopher is working in topics in epistemology, s/he is doing philosophy. That you believe this ...
February 04, 2023 at 15:38
Appears to me skepticism has a mathematical structure akin to the cancellation of opposite charges resulting in zero. Since zero in isolation is impra...
February 04, 2023 at 03:43
The above quote is how I boil down your statement to its essentials. The above quote I understand to be synonymous with: Philosophy = reflective think...
February 04, 2023 at 03:25
As I understand it, your above statement claims the question therein seeks a way, a manner or a means of knowing our acceptances-without-proof are rea...
February 03, 2023 at 21:57
I take you to mean (because of the double-negative) it is correct to understand: as a question that sparks the epistemological project of philosophy. ...
February 03, 2023 at 16:38
Is it incorrect to characterize the above question as a spark igniting epistemological inquiry? Its predomination as an itch that grows as we scratch ...
February 03, 2023 at 04:11
So the spark of philosophy is epistemological and philosophers are knowledge detectives?
February 03, 2023 at 02:05
:grin: Flattery comes unexpected. Thank-you for putting my name near your beautiful thought.
February 02, 2023 at 17:39
Day-old bread for the rabble.
February 02, 2023 at 17:32
Long stretch of time with dozens of mock-ups getting vaporized until, one fateful day, the atomic hurricane knocks the latest Hooterville sideways and...
February 02, 2023 at 17:28
Oh, yeah! Aspirant philosopher-in-training knuckles down with his grandfather-to-thumb-acer (all black, of course). Thinks he's gonna win! And yea! Pu...
February 02, 2023 at 17:18
Sword of truth!
February 02, 2023 at 04:53
It makes everybody laugh. :rofl:
February 02, 2023 at 04:48
Aw, man! You almost got me!
February 02, 2023 at 04:46