As to the first part of your quote, regarding language applied to physical processes, as to that, I say, "language is physical." How language is physi...
I'm attempting to examine whether or not your statements thus far imply what you deny in the above quote. Your two statements highlighted above, taken...
I suggest we try to illustrate a kind of flow chart of the interweave of matter_mind through use of Deacon's triumvirate: thermodynamics, morphodynami...
Do you not agree that signal transmission involves the process of reduction of the improbability of the reiteration of the same signal again and again...
Can you visualize for us a model of the structure of the something_nothing interweave; It might be in the mode of a blueprint drawn by an architect wh...
Thanks for your overview_summary of Incomplete Nature. In the above quote do you express a binary view of physical/non-physical, which is to ask, do y...
I don't think there's any controversy here. I don't have any philosophical issues with the quoted section of Post 68. I asked if you wrote the quotati...
What Is The Power of Absence? : Post 68 Enformation (see EnFormAction), in its physical form, is the workhorse of the universe. It begins as the law o...
How about a story prompt submission contest? Folks send in their prompts. A poll determines which prompt is most popular and thus it becomes the promp...
, After reading the above, I went to this link: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/408645 From there I went to: https://enformationism....
Yes. My interpretation of your declaration and to this I repost your affirmation: You've now read my denial of its truth content: Now you must refute ...
Your above statement, like previous, similar statements, merely DECLARES that my reading is a misreading. You have yet to PROVE it's a misreading. As ...
After quoting your demonstration, I presented an argument based upon my reading of your demonstration: After you dismiss my reading of your demonstrat...
I'm trying to say that "t" and "f" are not subsets of {t,f} because, being transcendent in the sense of the wave function, they inhabit a cloud of pro...
Since "posit" means: put forward as a basis of argument, and you put forward as a basis of argument that: then my saying, as interpretation of your ar...
Thanks for bearing with me up to this point. Clearly, the fog is coming solely from my side. That you see a couple of things I'm attempting in fumblin...
Your paraphrase, like your original statement, comes across to me loudly and clearly. What's not clear is whether or not I rationally interpret what y...
The attempted logic calculus is supposed to show me doing the math you claim I'm not doing. You ever try to converse with an english-as-a-second-langu...
I'm glad you asked me the question. It's trying to say that if X is transcendent, the domain of its transcendence can include itself. Self-transcenden...
Hello Banno, Can you or someone you know examine my logic calculus in the post linked below? I'd sure like to have a useful assessment. Hello, Tom Sto...
Hello 180 Proof, can you talk a little bit about how you understand supervenience? I ask for your thoughts on supervenience because within the context...
Is there any part of an event that doesn't belong to the mass_energy category? Our language allows "the" to modify "event," thus indicating the latter...
:up: :100: Your narrative is excellent! You've added good reasoning to the argument without the poetic frills of my whimsical imagery. Thank-you for w...
I erred in my characterization of the permanent denizens of the gaps as being "mystical." My correction, displayed above, instead characterizes them a...
The gist of my thesis: Analysis, when faced with the more complex, curvilinear forms of the natural world, as, for example, asymmetrical emergence, of...
You're right about the antiquity of psychedelia, so I propose to amend my narrative to say Joyce played a role in giving a literary gloss to it, just ...
The above quote is my framing context. It lays a foundation for the upshot of my OP: the sexual identities of the 21st century, which I characterize a...
You get a lot of credit for persisting in a dialog full of concepts that make you cringe. Your persistence here is deeply ironical because in your end...
Firstly, that's why you guys are due a lot of credit for persisting in this dialog. Most folks quickly avoid the incompetence_corruption you ascribe t...
Okay, universeness and 180 Proof have both proven me wrong in my speculations about them being unwilling to specifically reject the Holy Spirit in wri...
You think I want God to banish you to hell in reaction to our exchange of ideas within a debate? I'm a sinner, but I certainly hope I'm not guilty of ...
I admire your devotion to scholarship. How, given your education, you could fail to understand my question is a mystery. However, I seem to be getting...
God won't stop you from doing what you are empowered to do. The gates of Hell are locked from the inside. Those dwelling therein are there by personal...
I thank you both for your time and also for the extent to which you've tracked my facts, evidence and reasoning. One big dividend I've been receiving ...
> this is the link to 180s comment https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/789507 ... well, perhaps pandeism is pretty close to atheism, as ...
Okay, you've made a declaration. Are you unwilling to back it up with a supporting argument? It's easy to trace the three interlocking triangles and f...
Click on the link below and watch the short YouTube video. Trinity Logic Near the end of the video, with four seconds remaining, pause the video so yo...
I know that speculation about possible ontological similarities of the Trinity and entanglement must be regulated by study of the pertinent science. I...
Comments