You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

ucarr

Comments

As to the first part of your quote, regarding language applied to physical processes, as to that, I say, "language is physical." How language is physi...
December 13, 2023 at 16:35
I'm attempting to examine whether or not your statements thus far imply what you deny in the above quote. Your two statements highlighted above, taken...
December 12, 2023 at 15:27
I suggest we try to illustrate a kind of flow chart of the interweave of matter_mind through use of Deacon's triumvirate: thermodynamics, morphodynami...
December 12, 2023 at 14:34
Do you not agree that signal transmission involves the process of reduction of the improbability of the reiteration of the same signal again and again...
December 11, 2023 at 15:56
Can you visualize for us a model of the structure of the something_nothing interweave; It might be in the mode of a blueprint drawn by an architect wh...
December 11, 2023 at 15:13
Thanks for your overview_summary of Incomplete Nature. In the above quote do you express a binary view of physical/non-physical, which is to ask, do y...
December 09, 2023 at 20:11
I don't think there's any controversy here. I don't have any philosophical issues with the quoted section of Post 68. I asked if you wrote the quotati...
December 09, 2023 at 00:05
You make a good point and I apologize for being unreasonable. Did you write the section of Post 68 quoted above?
December 08, 2023 at 20:28
What Is The Power of Absence? : Post 68 Enformation (see EnFormAction), in its physical form, is the workhorse of the universe. It begins as the law o...
December 08, 2023 at 00:45
How about a story prompt submission contest? Folks send in their prompts. A poll determines which prompt is most popular and thus it becomes the promp...
December 07, 2023 at 02:44
, After reading the above, I went to this link: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/408645 From there I went to: https://enformationism....
December 07, 2023 at 02:32
:up:
December 05, 2023 at 15:24
I can't find any polling data in past competitions. Is it policy that the data naming the winner is NOT kept for posterity?
December 04, 2023 at 16:39
:up:
December 01, 2023 at 17:41
:up:
November 16, 2023 at 21:01
Yes. My interpretation of your declaration and to this I repost your affirmation: You've now read my denial of its truth content: Now you must refute ...
October 08, 2023 at 02:07
Your above statement, like previous, similar statements, merely DECLARES that my reading is a misreading. You have yet to PROVE it's a misreading. As ...
October 08, 2023 at 00:20
After quoting your demonstration, I presented an argument based upon my reading of your demonstration: After you dismiss my reading of your demonstrat...
October 07, 2023 at 19:26
I acknowledge your suggestion specifies the correct way for me to proceed and I will act accordingly.
October 06, 2023 at 22:28
I'm trying to say that "t" and "f" are not subsets of {t,f} because, being transcendent in the sense of the wave function, they inhabit a cloud of pro...
October 06, 2023 at 18:01
Since "posit" means: put forward as a basis of argument, and you put forward as a basis of argument that: then my saying, as interpretation of your ar...
October 06, 2023 at 00:21
Thanks for bearing with me up to this point. Clearly, the fog is coming solely from my side. That you see a couple of things I'm attempting in fumblin...
October 05, 2023 at 21:20
Your paraphrase, like your original statement, comes across to me loudly and clearly. What's not clear is whether or not I rationally interpret what y...
October 05, 2023 at 20:57
The attempted logic calculus is supposed to show me doing the math you claim I'm not doing. You ever try to converse with an english-as-a-second-langu...
October 05, 2023 at 20:35
I'm glad you asked me the question. It's trying to say that if X is transcendent, the domain of its transcendence can include itself. Self-transcenden...
October 05, 2023 at 04:00
Hello Banno, Can you or someone you know examine my logic calculus in the post linked below? I'd sure like to have a useful assessment. Hello, Tom Sto...
October 05, 2023 at 03:09
Hello 180 Proof, can you talk a little bit about how you understand supervenience? I ask for your thoughts on supervenience because within the context...
October 05, 2023 at 02:53
Is there any part of an event that doesn't belong to the mass_energy category? Our language allows "the" to modify "event," thus indicating the latter...
September 27, 2023 at 01:41
You imply events are not things. Why aren't they? Is there any phenomenon that doesn't find time a meaningful measure?
September 26, 2023 at 22:13
:up: :100: Your narrative is excellent! You've added good reasoning to the argument without the poetic frills of my whimsical imagery. Thank-you for w...
September 26, 2023 at 20:16
I erred in my characterization of the permanent denizens of the gaps as being "mystical." My correction, displayed above, instead characterizes them a...
September 26, 2023 at 20:09
The gist of my thesis: Analysis, when faced with the more complex, curvilinear forms of the natural world, as, for example, asymmetrical emergence, of...
September 26, 2023 at 04:28
You're right about the antiquity of psychedelia, so I propose to amend my narrative to say Joyce played a role in giving a literary gloss to it, just ...
September 25, 2023 at 21:43
:up: :up:
September 25, 2023 at 17:05
The above quote is my framing context. It lays a foundation for the upshot of my OP: the sexual identities of the 21st century, which I characterize a...
September 25, 2023 at 16:40
:up: :up: I too think human breathing and movement are apt subjects for development. Do you dismiss yoga?
September 24, 2023 at 03:27
You get a lot of credit for persisting in a dialog full of concepts that make you cringe. Your persistence here is deeply ironical because in your end...
September 23, 2023 at 20:21
Firstly, that's why you guys are due a lot of credit for persisting in this dialog. Most folks quickly avoid the incompetence_corruption you ascribe t...
September 23, 2023 at 19:58
:up: :grin:
September 22, 2023 at 22:51
Okay, universeness and 180 Proof have both proven me wrong in my speculations about them being unwilling to specifically reject the Holy Spirit in wri...
September 22, 2023 at 22:50
Is belief in the Trinity magical thinking?
September 22, 2023 at 19:11
You think I want God to banish you to hell in reaction to our exchange of ideas within a debate? I'm a sinner, but I certainly hope I'm not guilty of ...
September 22, 2023 at 19:07
I admire your devotion to scholarship. How, given your education, you could fail to understand my question is a mystery. However, I seem to be getting...
September 22, 2023 at 03:09
God won't stop you from doing what you are empowered to do. The gates of Hell are locked from the inside. Those dwelling therein are there by personal...
September 21, 2023 at 23:24
Let's do it. Shall I start?
September 21, 2023 at 19:06
I thank you both for your time and also for the extent to which you've tracked my facts, evidence and reasoning. One big dividend I've been receiving ...
September 21, 2023 at 19:01
> this is the link to 180s comment https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/789507 ... well, perhaps pandeism is pretty close to atheism, as ...
September 21, 2023 at 18:26
Okay, you've made a declaration. Are you unwilling to back it up with a supporting argument? It's easy to trace the three interlocking triangles and f...
September 21, 2023 at 16:28
Click on the link below and watch the short YouTube video. Trinity Logic Near the end of the video, with four seconds remaining, pause the video so yo...
September 21, 2023 at 15:07
I know that speculation about possible ontological similarities of the Trinity and entanglement must be regulated by study of the pertinent science. I...
September 20, 2023 at 18:07