ucarr

I acknowledge that you and 180 have an understanding of entanglement superior to mine. Having said that, I struggle to understand how you fail to see ...

Yeah. The dynamism of a functional system is work. Heat is a useless BYPRODUCT of that work. In this example, you're mistaken about what constitutes w...

The above argument is a useful tool for clarifying entanglement. I acknowledge it being true there is no instant communication between paired particle...

These details are presently unknown to me. I agree with this conceptualization, with questions already posted.

I think that heat, being unavailable to do work, and thus being an entropic drain on whatever system produces it, examples free energy. For example, w...

180 Proof rejects my claim of "instantaneous communication" across distance. I consider the claim a possibility. Does a unitary object like a wooden, ...

On 09-13-23, you asked for a supporting argument for my open universe. I gave you my supporting argument and you rebutted on 09-13-23. The gist of you...

See my above post.

It's true you're not dismissing within our context here the metaphysics of my super-naturalistic universe as fiction. Considering: and Considering: Do...

First of all thanks to both of you: 1) Thanks to 180 Proof for posing the important question of conservation; 2) Thanks to universeness for the clarif...

Firstly, "non-sequitur" assumes its meaning within the context of a proposition. My question about the correctness of my assessment of your metaphysic...

Do you see that one possible reading of your quotes conveys an ascription of what you deem oxymoronic to my openess theorem? Do you see how your first...

Is the world empty of all things a spiritual world, or a material world? Is your postulation of the conjoined two-world one that renders it paradoxica...

You ask: But after my I ask for clarification, you answer in the negative: Since we're talking about totality of existence, an open network of subsyst...

I'm speaking of "system," and positing universe as its limit. I imagine this has some bearing on TOE. Your TOE configures "everything" and its origin ...

Are you asking how an open network of subsystems configures conservation within its domain? Do you perceive a conflict between conservation and and so...

We both know entanglement has been experimentally verified: Quantum Entanglement Your argument against instantaneous, paired-particles communication a...

If you're going down to the scale of x ^ {-35}, then you need to supply parameters for the domains of laws, theorems, functions, etc. Is it establishe...

You make a useful distinction. As you say, something incomplete might be closed. The two are not equivalent and the subsystem configuration is both op...

Note: You ask an important question just when I'm developing my thinking about the role of "universe" within "system." My response will therefore be b...

So panpsychism and super-nature, as presented in my statement, are superfluous to the things covered in your list.

• I’m a panpsychist in that I believe all matter at all levels, including compounds, elements, radicals, molecules, atoms and elementary particles, ar...

My point is trying to examine whether self-organizing systems, accountable for self-organizing complexity, possess purpose. Are they instead automaton...

If one event were measured at -0.75 degrees celsius and another event measured at -0.250 degrees celsius, with everything else being equal, would this...

Regarding what I'm aware of and understand, either in the abstract or in application, my discovery is an ongoing process. For example: Maybe the struc...

I too have enjoyed our interactions. I discover details of my premises in the hot kitchen of debate. The demand to justify claims forces me to look mo...

I counter-argue that the complete description of the logical relations pertaining to superposition within spacetime goes as follows: A is in position ...

Regarding the math identity equation, are you claiming that either: a) It is not a valid example of a distinction without difference that is not conce...

You say nothing that refutes my supposition about life propagation occurring outside of evolution. My supposition about a quantum leap from non-sentie...

This is a buttress to what I said.

Although it's a stretch, it's theoretically grounded. It's not a leap of faith because Einstein showed us there's no unitary time throughout the unive...

Could it be that during a lull in the fighting we're all on the same page?

I, in contrast to you, proceed from the notion a closed universe is all encompassing. If it's closed, how can you confirm/deny an outside? On a logica...

In my response to your previous post, I say something similar to this. This is a good linear time argument within a Newtonian, 3-space universe. After...

In your first sentence, you seem to be saying the appearance of sentient life on earth was not part of evolution; it was a quantum leap from non-senti...

Since higher orders of categories are logically valid, your cannot prove, logically, that cosmic sentience, a higher-order category of nature, cannot ...

This is you positing A = A; cosmic sentience is itself in isolation. I claim the above statement can be read as: cosmic sentience 'Of only itself' (A ...

This is you positing A = A; cosmic sentience is itself in isolation. This is you claiming A = A (cosmic sentience) is itself in isolation AND also cla...

I'm wondering why your perplexity about what could lie beyond a set encompassing all of existence doesn't make you doubt the possibility of a closed u...

As you already know, that claim (with condition of the universe being a closed system) is made here in this conversation. Yeah. The tendency towards t...

Cox and I describe a continuity from matter-energy to sentience within the animal kingdom. Cox and I ask what it means to be sentient matter-energy th...

This is a good, compact description of possible structural errors that can sink a theorem. Let's see if their ascription to my theorem is factual. I t...

I think it says the universe is a gigantic example of a black hole. If this is true, then the universe is not truly closed because its bounded energy ...

Some memes propagate far and wide, becoming myth-based beliefs. Well-organized systems of thought and belief predicated upon sound logic, whether scie...

You have a strong argument, but there’s a strong defense. You make the moral relativity argument. By the same argument, a moral precept locally verifi...

Why Non-Contradiction Needs to Soften A_not-A_B ? B_not-B_A Superposition expressed as symbolic logic shows us that the hard boundaries of rational, r...

My response will come after further development. If a moral precept is verified logical and deemed pertinent to empirical experience, does its source ...

Okay. The quote is hyperbole, not literal statement. Okay. Natural science unconfirmed can be conjectured as "supernatural" although, in your opinion,...

If we numericalize strangeness as a range of inferential logics derived from experimentally verified facts, and if we plot a standard deviation for th...

The book citation is much appreciated. Thank-you. :up: