Hello @"Philosophim", Fantastic points! To keep this condensed into one response, I am going to try and address your points more generally (but let me...
Hello @"Philosophim", I apologize for the double post here, but I've had more time to think and wanted to share a bit more with you (so you can mow it...
Hello @"Philosophim", Likewise, I thoroughly enjoy our conversations! I have a lot of respect for how well thought out your positions are! I don't thi...
Hello @"Philosophim", Let me start off with a concession: you are 100% correct here. I apologize for the confusion; I am currently slapping myself upo...
Hello @"Philosophim", No problem! I do think that you aren't quite following what I am trying to convey. So I am going to keep this response incredibl...
Hello @"Philosophim", I agree. Furthermore, I really appreciate your elaboration as I now understand better where exactly you are coming from. Likewis...
Hello @"Philosophim", If I am understanding your analogy correctly, then I would say (1) you are agreeing with me that discrete experience is not syno...
Hello @"Philosophim", I think we may, after all, be attempting to convey the same underlying meaning with "conceptualization" and "discrete experience...
Hello @"Philosophim", I agree, I think we are still not quite understanding each other, so I will try to do my best to respond to your statements (ver...
Hello @"Philosophim", I think that, although I completely understand that it seems completely unrelated to your epistemology, the first quote pertains...
Hello @"Philosophim", Thank you! Same to you! I wasn't bringing that up with any implication that you weren't attempting to understand the underlying ...
Hello @"Philosophim", No worries! I always appreciate your responses because they are so well thought out! I think, before I address your post (which ...
Hello @"Philosophim", Yes, but I don't think an "irrational induction" is "despite the application contradicting the belief" anymore, it is when is is...
Hello @"Philosophim", I think the comparison is more relevant when you actually have to choose between the two. As a radical example, imagine someone ...
Hello @"Philosophim", Yes, I think we are on the same page now! I agree. But I suspect that you are only referring to the comparison of plausibilities...
Hello @"Philosophim", I apologize for such a belated response: I've been quite swarmed recently. I think that the first sentence here is sort of like ...
Hello @"Philosophim", I appreciate that you put your concerns (with respect to potentiality) in a such a concise manner, as it really helps me, on the...
Hello @"Philosophim", Thank you Philosophim! You are a marvelous philosopher yourself! I am also thoroughly enjoying our conversation. I agree in that...
Hello @"Philosophim", Although I understand what you are saying, and I agree with you in a sense, potentiality is not based off of hindsight but, rath...
Hello @"Philosophim", It is completely up to you, but I think that inapplicable plausibilities should be a plausibility; It is just that, in order to ...
Hello @"Philosophim", I agree with you here, but my point was that it is an inapplicable plausibility (which means we are on the same page now I think...
Hello @"Philosophim", I am glad that you are feeling well! I don't think this is necessarily true. It depends on what you mean by "applicably known": ...
Hello @"Philosophim", Oh no! I am glad that you are recovering and I hope you have a speedy recovery! This is all and well, but I think you defined "p...
Hello @"Philosophim", The dots have finally clicked for me! I think I understand what you are stating now and, so, most of what I said has been negate...
Hello @"Philosophim", I agree: I think that we are using terms drastically differently. Furthermore, I don't, as of now, agree with your use of the te...
Hello @"Philosophim", Absolutely splendid post! I thoroughly enjoyed reading it! Upon further reflection, I think that we are using the terms "possibi...
Hello @"T Clark", Although I may have just missed it, I think that most of this discussion has been centered around free will vs determinism and the i...
Hello @"Philosophim", First and foremost, Merry Christmas! I hope you have (had) a wonderful holiday! I apologize as I haven't had the time to answer ...
Hello @"Philosophim", I apologize, as things have been a bit busy for me, but, nevertheless, here's my response! Absolutely no problem! I really appre...
Hello @"Philosophim", I am glad that we are able to agree and discuss further as well! Honestly, as our discussion has progressed, I have realized mor...
Hello @"Philosophim", I think that the first issue I am pondering is the fact that neither of our epistemologies, as discussed hitherto, really clarif...
@"Philosophim", I see now! I now understand your epistemology to be the application of deductions, or inductions that vary by degree of cogency, withi...
Hello @"Philosophim", I agree, I think that we both understand each others' definition of "I" and that I have not adequately shown the relevance of my...
Hello @"Philosophim", Thank you for the clarification! I see now that we have pin pointed our disagreement and I will now attempt to describe it as ac...
@"Philosophim" I am glad that we have reached an agreement! I completely understand that views change over time and we don't always refurbish our writ...
@"Philosophim" Also, I would then be interested to what you refurbished definition of distinctive knowledge would be: is it simply discrete experience...
@"Philosophim" I think that we are in agreement if you are removing the idea of awareness from discrete knowledge. However, I am still slightly confus...
Hello @"Philosophim", Although I understand what you are trying to say, this is factually false (even if we remove my claim that thoughts are sensed)....
Hello @"Philosophim", Thank you for your clarifications of your terminology: I understand it better now! I see now where our disagreements lie. For no...
Hello @"Philosophim", Absolutely no problem! I would much rather wait for a detailed, thought-provoking response than a quick, malformed (so to speak)...
Hello @"Philosophim", Firstly, great work! I enjoyed reading your collection of epistemological essays! Since it was a lot to unpack, I am going to si...
Hello @"Philosophim", I see your dilemma now, and, therefore, exactly why you are utilizing causality instead of explanation. Although I think that ut...
Hello @"Philosophim", First of all, I would like to thank you for such a splendid, thought-provoking conversation! Moreover, I also think that we are ...
Hello @"Philosophim", Firstly, I would concur that it is, indeed, impractical to completely disband from induction. However, I don’t really agree with...
Hello @"Philosophim", Before I address your most recent reply, I wanted to apologize for a such a late response! With that out of the way, I will now ...
Hello @"Philosophim", Thank you for your commentary and further elaborative thoughts on my response post! I really appreciate you taking your time to ...
Hello @"Philosophim", I really enjoyed your post (regardless of the position I would take on the issue at hand) due its thorough and substantive natur...
@"Edy" First and foremost, I really enjoyed your analogy Edy. However, I must say that I do not agree with it (on multiple different levels). Don't ge...
Comments