You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Baden

Comments

Well, this is exactly what @"NOS4A2" wants. Let's use scientific objectivity (who could disagree with that!) to bash political correctness because one...
December 17, 2019 at 21:27
My first year in uni right there. Where's @"ArguingWAristotleTiff"?
December 17, 2019 at 20:44
Science should be politically neutral, which is why scientific terms shouldn't have political overtones. If "supremacy" can be considered historically...
December 17, 2019 at 20:40
Yes, like every other politician. And then he lets KSA murder journalists because he wants their arms deals. When are you going to get beyond your inf...
December 16, 2019 at 23:25
Politics by greeting card slogans. :yawn:
December 16, 2019 at 21:56
Yes, the U.S. is that shining light at the end of the tunnel (that signals an oncoming train).
December 16, 2019 at 21:01
In: Brexit  — view comment
This is a way longer answer than you deserve so Happy Christmas (or Hannah’s Car, or whatever). Broad generalizations in either direction aren't infor...
December 16, 2019 at 17:30
Yes, only subscribers can upload images because we need to pay for the space, basically.
December 15, 2019 at 22:24
Haven't seen the list but I would think Keir Starmer would be good.
December 14, 2019 at 16:11
In: Brexit  — view comment
Semantics alert! >>'Going left' can mean moving left and aiming for the center or moving left and aiming for the left, with the latter being the more ...
December 13, 2019 at 23:46
Bernard Stiegler - The Re-Enchantment of the World—The Value of spirit against Industrial Populism
December 13, 2019 at 23:32
In: Brexit  — view comment
Unfortunately not. Mogg was sidelined and told to shut up after being too much of a posh twit even for the Conservatives. And, yes, long may that cont...
December 13, 2019 at 22:23
In: Brexit  — view comment
I'll take these in reverse order. 1) Centre not left. 2) It doesn't matter what Johnson says. 3) Because he's a pragmatist and the context has just ch...
December 13, 2019 at 22:18
Well done on getting through that in a day. Dude has some mfuckin' vocabulary going on. :lol:
December 13, 2019 at 20:54
In: Brexit  — view comment
Looking forward to making you eat this when the Dems win the Whitehouse. :halo: What position anyway? Brexit? Boris's ban on combs? Michael Gove's pro...
December 13, 2019 at 16:47
In: Brexit  — view comment
Your error is misinterpreting what I said. I said he'll stuff the far right Brexiteers not Brexiteers in general, who come from a variety of political...
December 13, 2019 at 13:52
In: Brexit  — view comment
The working class prioritised and voted for Brexit, many for good reason, and now they've got it. That's totally fair. They'll lose out in other ways ...
December 13, 2019 at 09:40
In: Brexit  — view comment
They were outmanoeuvred. The Leave vote was united. The Remain vote was split. And Workington man couldn't give a toss that Boris is an areshole. In f...
December 12, 2019 at 22:22
In: Brexit  — view comment
Congrats Jo Swinson on handing this to him on a plate.
December 12, 2019 at 22:18
In: Brexit  — view comment
Boris won the alpha male vote. Cue break-up of UK.
December 12, 2019 at 22:17
Having a read now. Strangely compelling despite (or maybe because of) the convoluted prose. (Being too lazy to find my own books, I'm just going to ke...
December 12, 2019 at 21:00
In: Brexit  — view comment
If Johnson doesn't get his overall majority, the milky bars are on me. If he loses his seat, I'll make it champagne. (I was going to post an inspiring...
December 11, 2019 at 22:25
I suggest you start with his most recent OP. Soon to be rectified. :up:
December 11, 2019 at 20:45
I understand that perspective. Another one though would be that that would be extra work for us for the sake of posters who didn't put enough work int...
December 11, 2019 at 18:07
In: Bannings  — view comment
Eh, I think we're done here.
December 10, 2019 at 23:26
Maybe we're a little too conservative in who we get rid of for low quality, but a) we want to give posters a chance to improve and b) we post bannings...
December 10, 2019 at 22:54
From the guidelines: "The above guidelines are in place to help us maintain a high standard of discussion and debate, and they will be enforced. If yo...
December 10, 2019 at 17:39
As an admin, I have access to deleted posts and appeal is possible. But he's banned now, so no point digging them up.
December 10, 2019 at 13:54
In: Bannings  — view comment
Banned @"ovdtogt" for refusing moderation. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/7257/my-posts-are-being-removed-i-wish-to-know-on-what-grounds
December 10, 2019 at 13:09
*Sigh*
December 10, 2019 at 13:02
I'd advise you to calm down and wait for further explanation from @"StreetlightX" (such as he feels appropriate to give) or we will have no choice but...
December 10, 2019 at 12:57
I didn't see your OP, but the link explains moderation procedures, and @"StreetlightX" is a moderator. Here's some more info: https://thephilosophyfor...
December 10, 2019 at 12:54
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/480/site-guidelines
December 10, 2019 at 12:50
Um, bad taste?
December 10, 2019 at 01:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XykEnBpyfr4
December 10, 2019 at 01:15
Or support your claims with argument and evidence. Either would be fine.
December 10, 2019 at 00:26
If you just came here to spout unsupported nonsense, please bugger off. There are people here interested in a serious conversation.
December 10, 2019 at 00:10
Don't take our word for it, just read. "Even though Blair’s New Labour came to power on the basis of a social-democrat agenda which included redistrib...
December 09, 2019 at 20:28
Why? Why? You've made an assertion without argument or evidence. Just make an effort to back it up and I'll show you where you're going wrong.
December 09, 2019 at 19:34
In: Brexit  — view comment
Swinson made such a mess of this election campaign, beginning with her revoke gambit, then her mercenary move of giving Boris his election exactly whe...
December 09, 2019 at 19:31
Do you even read what you link to? To describe Tony Blair as a neosocialist because he once used the word "socialism" in a speech and then link to an ...
December 09, 2019 at 19:22
We don't need political labels for this. The basic idea goes back at least as far as Aristotle:
December 09, 2019 at 13:11
Therein lies the major problem of the day (not Trump being a corrupt racist self-serving dick, which he clearly is and so requires no debate).
December 09, 2019 at 12:04
I'd put it this way, the super-rich have a strong enough combination of economic, technological, and informational resources to transform functional d...
December 09, 2019 at 12:03
Yep.
December 09, 2019 at 11:53
Both sides are disgusting for different reasons. I can agree with almost every criticism made of Trump while not going along with the agenda of everyo...
December 09, 2019 at 11:50
Alright, I'll put you on hold. @"NOS4A2"?
December 09, 2019 at 10:49
@"Wayfarer" Trump is obviously a corrupt scumbag, piece of shit etc. but he's just a symptom of neoliberal plutocracy, not the cause. For that, see Re...
December 09, 2019 at 10:24
Art divorced from aesthetic value tends to work by retroactively creating the conditions for its own success. If it's presumed to be worthwhile enough...
December 08, 2019 at 12:31
Don't throw the baby out with the banana.
December 08, 2019 at 12:19