Just a tiny notice. The terms "order/disorder" are observer depended. ITs not an intrinsic feature that a system can be "based on". The different phas...
This great topic demonstrates the instrumental role Philosophy should have in everyday life(reality)...but nobody seems to care about weighing in!(ans...
"Egalitarian cause" is an abstract concept. Abstract concepts can not fail. What fails is the process displaying the property described by the abstrac...
In Human Behavioral Psychology there isn't such a thing as "A" Human Nature but Human Nature has different expressions. Human behavior is affected by ...
That value statement lies on objective criteria. Pseudo Philosophy is: 1.Philosophy that relies on fallacious arguments to a conclusion 2. and/or reli...
-you stated , I quote "Philosophy and science are doing two different things." So I pointed out that its not about science vs philosophy, its Philosop...
When someone assumes an unobservable untestable ontology in addition to a necessary and sufficient scientific description , then the source of that on...
You didn't quote my argument so I am not sure you understood it correctly Correct. Science produces the most credible Epistemology while Philosophy is...
-Yes that is his point and I am not saying he is not making that point. I am only saying that his objections are hugely misinformed! All Emergent prop...
Well the end of Philosophy came with that "why" question. There is nowhere to go from there. If we embrace the right "how/what" question there is plen...
No I have not, I haven't suggested any problems. I am just addressing one of the pseudo philosophical "why" questions of Chalmers's supposedly "hard p...
[re First of the content of a metaphysical belief(accuracy) about the nature of the world does not really play any role in our survival. Accuracy is n...
Only the content of our experiences has a subjective quality. The process enabling our conscious experiences is biological thus it is affected by all ...
Well if I understand your question correctly the answer should go like this. Being able to experience your environment and what patterns, emotions and...
Why not letting science weigh in on this issue? Giving Up on Consciousness as the Ghost in the Machine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC81...
Again, you are committing a Strawman and a false authority fallacy. I am NOT talking "about him". I am criticizing the obvious teleological error in h...
Well its true but its trivial, commonly known as a deepity. Information uses other mediums than i.e. procreation where transferring biological materia...
that has nothing to do with logic (or knowledge). That is mostly scientific ignorance. -....there are these things called eyes, ears and mouth which a...
Here is some Academic material for those who are interested in updating their philosophy on the topic. Our epistemology on Consciousness is a huge mos...
You did the same mistake. You didn't provide definitions! Words don't have intrinsic meaning they have common usages. You will need to define Theory a...
That's an argument from false authority fallacy. Reasoning doesn't really have experts . We are all experts on matters of logic as long as we are awar...
-Ok I get what you mean by that word, but there is a huge practical problem in that definition. You define consciousness as "awareness of intelligibil...
Again you are wrong. First of all I am a Methodological Naturalist. This means that I reject all metaphysical worldviews (materialism/physicalism/meta...
-You are wrong. You are trying to make an argument from ambiguity by using lame or specific meanings on both concepts. -" I grant that it's not always...
. -The issue here is that the reductionistic approach is not the only tool available to Science so people shouldn't accuse Science for failing to solv...
-You shouldn't because it describes an observable fact. A human being can NOT experience a Conscious state without the arousal of this specific brain ...
Why do you say that? The first part of my definition is descriptive. If he disagrees then he either refers to a different phenomenon or a specific sub...
I will try to break down every single claim in the OP(and some in your article) and ultimately try to explain why most of those "memes" in philosophy ...
So are you making an ontological question on the manifestation of reality? Does your argument(or better question) challenges the external source of th...
4% Philosophers voted in favor of Idealism. That is alarming especially when those who don't believe in an external world are the "authors" of a poll ...
I really don't see how blind people's experiences with sight can be helpful to this question ( whether seeing completely subjective). The answer in my...
Started watching your 1st video. Again, right in the beginning there is a huge error. You define your goals, but in your third point you are committin...
Just started watching your video(part2 I think)...and right at the beginning you start with wrong premises. You are promoting a strawman that science ...
I never said that I figured you out...and I don't need to be a genius to figured you out. I only have to look in the Philosophical Principles (superna...
Mark Solmes corrected Descartes's deepity by pointing out "I feel - therefore I am". In his latest Theory on Consciousness he explains how our conscio...
So your way of doing Philosophy is by putting up videos containing either pseudo scientific material or pseudo philosophical interpretations on the to...
You are off topic. You sound ignorant on the use of Definitions in science and philosophy and you are ignorant on what "theory" means in science. I do...
I will try to introduce some meaning to this discussion. You are making claims and arriving at conclusions based on Testimonies WITHOUT first providin...
-I should have done the same with your OP because you already decided to ignore the epistemology that really matters and instead present fringe supern...
Do you really believe that emotion is the best way to interpret an experience? Really? This is how we end up with stories on ghosts, goblins and UFOs....
No because the definition I gave for existence is used in Science. Science is our ultimate "ontological" tool. It has helped us many times to remove e...
your inverse view has zero epistemic or philosophical value. As Wolfgang Pauli would have pointed out, its "Not even Wrong". Whether a scientists or a...
From the top of my head I can direct you to an Academic Mooc explains the fundamental properties of our mind. (1. Awakeness 2.Unconsious Awareness of ...
Our existence(self) is one of the aspects of the world we experience. -well you can not study your self without taking in to account your environment....
-I guess we agree on that. They shouldn't discount testimonial evidence as "not evidence". They are insufficient evidence until they are evaluated. Th...
The central issue ?f Philosophy is the construction of wise theoretical frameworks capable to expand our understanding on all aspects of the world.The...
I have to dismiss all NDEs and OBEs claims from being a credible source of knowledge. I don't believe a dying brain deprived from oxygen can be the be...
Solipsism is a "Not even wrong" ontological claim. Whether its true or not it doesn't change a thing in how we register and evaluate Empirical Regular...
Comments