You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

But Moliere will probably still get the notification, because he posted the post identified by the number.
June 07, 2025 at 09:30
That’s right, the numeric code after the semicolon points back to the post.
June 07, 2025 at 09:17
It jumps back to the top of the post but not to a point within the post, unless there is a special way of implementing anchor links that I’m not aware...
June 07, 2025 at 09:09
Good questions. The idea of constellations will be important.
June 07, 2025 at 06:36
I was the one who deleted your post; it was rubbish. Be cool or get lost.
June 06, 2025 at 22:12
Rein.
June 06, 2025 at 14:25
Your post strikes me as perspicacious.
June 06, 2025 at 12:33
I forgive you, mainly because you used "purblind".
June 06, 2025 at 07:00
It doesn't. It starts by stating the conclusion that will be argued for in the main body of the essay. The argument hasn't been presented yet, so ther...
June 06, 2025 at 05:02
Is that malicious culture-war trolling?
June 06, 2025 at 04:43
Fair enough. I just meant something like not fictional or not imaginary, in other words not purely conceptual. This has to be emphasized because Adorn...
June 06, 2025 at 04:28
The way I'm using "objective," it does not mean "mind-independent," or pertaining only to what is not dependent on a subject. It means it's not just a...
June 05, 2025 at 12:16
Ultimately, I have nothing against making the situation clear in the rules next time.
June 05, 2025 at 09:13
Yes, I agree. What we need in future is to establish how much people want to be able to publish their TPF work elsewhere. Perhaps some people are unaw...
June 05, 2025 at 08:48
Feedspot is a blog reader and content aggregator and is thus nothing new and nothing to worry about in particular. TPF is a website, by default all po...
June 05, 2025 at 08:23
Introduction: dialectics not a standpoint The first paragraph stands up for (a kind of) dialectics and leads towards the first introduction of the con...
June 05, 2025 at 08:12
I don't know if the potential publishers of philosophical essays apply the same exclusivity criteria as many of the fiction magazines do. From my very...
June 05, 2025 at 08:04
Nothing has changed, except that @"hypericin" wanted to share essays with non-members. I made the symposium viewable only by members because I wanted ...
June 05, 2025 at 07:48
Sitting on stools around a barrel is a great pleasure. :up:
June 05, 2025 at 06:49
Good, except I don't think the “power” and “hegemony” that philosophies of Spirit are directed towards or against refer to the technicians per se. Tec...
June 04, 2025 at 18:38
:up:
June 04, 2025 at 09:39
@"Moliere" @"hypericin" @"Baden" I have made the essays public, as promised. Although @"Baden" and @"Amity" were against it, they did not give any rea...
June 04, 2025 at 08:01
ND Introduction: on the possibility of philosophy This first paragraph is basically lecture 5 in an extremely condensed form: (a) the failure of the p...
June 04, 2025 at 07:48
@"hypericin" Ok, if in 12 hours nobody has given a reason why the essays shouldn't be made public, I'll make them public. How's that?
June 03, 2025 at 18:18
@"hypericin" @"Moliere" I'm removing the custom permissions for the essay category, which will put things back to how they were before I made the mist...
June 03, 2025 at 17:34
When I made them public I made them viewable by guests but forgot I had to explicitly make them viewable by members too.
June 03, 2025 at 17:25
As requested by @"hypericin", I made the essays viewable to guests and search engines, just like most other posts and discussions. If any participants...
June 03, 2025 at 17:23
Can you see the essays now?
June 03, 2025 at 17:19
Done
June 03, 2025 at 16:37
Yes, that makes sense to me :up: He is fond of using the "cards on the table" metaphor, I think because he is aware how insistent the demand for initi...
June 03, 2025 at 16:30
Very creative, MU. We'll see how each of our interpretations survives the onslaught of ND itself.
June 03, 2025 at 12:17
Ok :up:
June 03, 2025 at 09:51
No, please come up with your own arguments.
June 03, 2025 at 09:02
Ah, I see. It would have been deleted for containing very little of your own argument—mainly it was just content produced by ChatGPT. So I've deleted ...
June 03, 2025 at 08:17
ND Prologue The first paragraph is the familiar rejection of the tradition of affirmation in dialectics stretching all the way from Plato to Hegel. Th...
June 03, 2025 at 06:07
I enjoyed your video, although unfortunately I did not understand more than a few words. What I enjoyed was the pleasant surroundings, the relaxed atm...
June 03, 2025 at 05:20
I question this assumption that if a distinction is real, it must be fixed and immune to reinterpretation. That’s just one of those rigid frameworks w...
June 03, 2025 at 03:10
Do you mean this one?: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15835/democracy-and-military-success The last post was 3 months ago, so it’s on page ...
June 02, 2025 at 21:26
I think the “such” refers to the “philosophical concepts” just mentioned. So my version is as follows: “Since Hegel attempted to do the impossible, na...
June 02, 2025 at 18:33
Then we'll have to carry on disagreeing. Adorno believes there are beliefs and ways of thinking that obscure underlying social relations, and uses app...
June 02, 2025 at 12:26
It's crazy to me that people never read prefaces. There are cases where I don't, when I read the preface afterwards, but I don't skip them completely ...
June 02, 2025 at 05:22
Wow.
June 02, 2025 at 05:09
On the other hand, at least for me, I can't remember much about my post-childhood life unless I replay it, talk about it, think about it repeatedly. O...
June 02, 2025 at 05:07
Hey, I'm not finished yet! You think you can get the last word so easily? No such luck, sonny boy. I'll be back.
June 02, 2025 at 04:50
Excellent work! It shares concerns with a recent discussion in the Negative Dialectics reading group, about Adorno's claim that human beings were "bec...
June 02, 2025 at 04:37
Well, I don't really know what you're on about. Have a look back at my original response, where I mentioned spandrels. I was attempting to take your q...
June 02, 2025 at 04:20
There will be discussions in those threads, and you won't be able to see them. They cover a wide range of philosophical areas so you could just preten...
June 02, 2025 at 04:11
The reason you are struggling is that you have an expansive, wishywashy idea of utility. Oscar meant it in terms of sheer practicality, whereby a beau...
June 02, 2025 at 04:04
Go to the category, "Phil. writing challenge - June 2025", scroll to the bottom, click on the eye. I urge you not to do it though, because I think tho...
June 02, 2025 at 03:51
All right, replace value with meaning and see what you think of that.
June 02, 2025 at 03:46