You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

The question is whether the mind is an algorithm, meaning the human mind, which m-theory is suggesting might be one of the philosophical implications.
August 19, 2016 at 09:59
The computational theory of mind is one philosophical view among many, and it's been heavily criticized. If it's your position then cool, but don't pr...
August 19, 2016 at 09:43
On behalf of the original TPF crew: you're welcome. @"Hanover" was our guiding light, of course. Now there's a true visionary.
August 19, 2016 at 09:03
(Y) Note that we use a hosted service called PlushForums, which is based on some kind of fork of Vanilla Forums, so I'm not actually a developer of th...
August 19, 2016 at 08:55
But you only see it if you go to "Mentions" in your profile menu, don't you? Or is it that you're not clicking on the notification and it's still tell...
August 19, 2016 at 08:50
You mean clear the items in your list of mentions? Not that I know of. Why would you want to do that?
August 19, 2016 at 08:45
I think I'd class them as philosophers too, though they didn't pursue it thoroughly and decided to change the world instead. There's a fantastic book ...
August 19, 2016 at 08:02
As for the effect of philosophy on my life, it's definitely changed the way I approach anomalous monism and transcendental phenomenology.
August 19, 2016 at 05:56
His philosophical method is historical and owes a lot to Marx and Kuhn. He says that there are no transhistorical standards to appeal to in assessing ...
August 19, 2016 at 05:44
Yes, I did notice that bit, and I agree it's not satisfying. Really it's a different way of putting the point at issue. May say more later.
August 19, 2016 at 04:49
You beat me to it. On the other hand, most atheists are not philosophers, and we might get a better picture of things by looking at the wider secular ...
August 19, 2016 at 04:43
I'm a bit confused. Would anyone like to try setting out exactly why a meta-ethics based on an empirical concept of the human form of life is such a b...
August 18, 2016 at 17:03
Ha! Yeah I hate it when people respond to my posts before I get a chance to correct them.
August 18, 2016 at 16:53
Thanks @"Pierre-Normand". As you're using Kant's phrasing, shouldn't this be the other way around? "There can be no doubt that all knowledge begins wi...
August 18, 2016 at 13:10
Here's what I'm thinking about Thompson's argument. I want to agree with the conclusion that we can interpret moral judgments naturalistically, i.e., ...
August 18, 2016 at 09:57
Nice post McD, and quite familiar to me. I recently noticed Peter Hitchens arguing for the use of the term Judeophobia to describe present-day anti-Je...
August 17, 2016 at 17:37
Note that I moved this thread to the Feedback category. We aim not to moderate Feedback at all, so you're free to say what you like here. As it happen...
August 17, 2016 at 14:32
You haven't addressed what I said. If you're only in the discussion to spout your prejudice, don't bother posting again.
August 17, 2016 at 13:48
Yeah, after reading that bit the first time through I chose to ignore it, as it just didn't seem helpful. I thought I had a decent enough grasp of wha...
August 17, 2016 at 10:33
Incidentally, my only encounters with virtue ethics have been with Aristotle and MacIntyre, and I like the approach a lot. Although it's a side-issue,...
August 17, 2016 at 08:31
Thanks @"Pierre-Normand" for a great introduction. The paper's argument is somewhat convoluted, especially if you're like me and you're not familiar w...
August 17, 2016 at 08:01
So more like a philosophical appropriation or expression of politics, rather than a political appropriation of philosophy.
August 16, 2016 at 17:59
If I may: I don't disagree with your substantive points here, but I think there's another side to the story, which is that materialism has not--at lea...
August 16, 2016 at 09:58
Maybe, but I'm quite happy to use it too.
August 15, 2016 at 22:48
This is an appealing idea, but maybe it's an unavoidable result of the nature of philosophy. The very practice of philosophy is a performative repudia...
August 15, 2016 at 13:10
I know that's probably tongue-in-cheek, but let me interpret it as making a serious point, namely that one can uselessly call anything reductionist if...
August 15, 2016 at 12:34
Sure, but I'm playing with concepts. The way we tend to talk about these things might not be the best, and it may be that the philosophical problems w...
August 15, 2016 at 12:16
Or, developing one of @"Moliere"'s examples, "This table appears like an external object, but is really a product of your subjective experience". Noti...
August 15, 2016 at 11:54
Everything is mental.
August 15, 2016 at 11:46
I just want to suggest that if one is arguing for a telos, one can dispense with intention, which has strong connotations of conscious purpose, even i...
August 15, 2016 at 11:39
I think this could be an important point. One could even draw a distinction that cuts across those which are commonly made around this issue: between,...
August 15, 2016 at 11:25
This is exactly the problem I have with some of the criticism of reductionism. It must assume that science and materialism are crudely reductionist, b...
August 15, 2016 at 10:33
A nice critique, and I mostly agree with it. Some scattered thoughts... A response to one of your arguments is that reductionism does not actually ass...
August 15, 2016 at 10:12
Yes, although in this discussion I think it probably doesn't matter. Ethnicity can be about shared cultural, historical, linguistic or religious pract...
August 15, 2016 at 08:25
Yes I see, but we're working with some unclear distinctions here, and I suppose I was trying to cover all the bases. In one sense reductionism is a me...
August 15, 2016 at 08:01
If Jews don't exist, who is the target of the prejudice that goes by the name of anti-semitism? This looks like a way of saying that anti-Jewish preju...
August 14, 2016 at 22:02
Thompson wins. @"Pierre-Normand" is going to start the discussion thread in a couple of days, so get reading!
August 14, 2016 at 18:25
(Y) It's a point I've made before, although it should be noted that Dennett does mean it in the strong reductionist sense, I think. What makes the imm...
August 14, 2016 at 13:14
Good. Welcome to the forum. :) Assuming it doesn't win, I think we should do it next month and not bother with a poll.
August 14, 2016 at 04:29
Yeah it's a tag search. I haven't tagged anything so far, but it could come in handy. For example, if you write something about site functionality and...
August 13, 2016 at 09:11
Okay PN, Thompson's back in.
August 12, 2016 at 09:55
Cool, I'll add it to the list and do a poll soon.
August 11, 2016 at 06:41
Reading it as a kind of conversation, I'm reminded of moments of intense camaraderie. The enthusiasm is infectious, and it does feel more sincere and ...
August 11, 2016 at 05:01
Thanks for going into that. It's fascinating, but personally I can't say I've experienced anything remotely as complex and interesting, in terms of pe...
August 10, 2016 at 09:04
Allow me to ramble about something. Because of my job I'm hardly away from my computer, day and night, but I do make time to go out for bike rides and...
August 10, 2016 at 07:32
I'm honoured. And though I used to be one of those who defended pornography, I've changed my mind about it now. I think it really is changing the way ...
August 10, 2016 at 07:05
Another way to do it could be to set up a permanent group dedicated to reading something each month, and once you're in the group, you gotta do it. An...
August 09, 2016 at 12:44
It's a cunning plan. The democratic charade makes people think they've made a decision even if their choice doesn't win, and once they've made suggest...
August 09, 2016 at 12:35
Why? might be a good question, but asking Dawkins why there is life is a bit like asking a military historian why there is war: given that there is wa...
August 09, 2016 at 12:30
So here's a potential list for the poll: Peter Sloterdijk, "Rules for the Human Zoo" GEM Anscombe, "Modern Moral Philosophy" Harry Frankfurt, "On Bull...
August 09, 2016 at 10:10