You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleteduserrc

Comments

Wasn't the point about visualizing abstract triangles that you'd have to visualize a particular triangle (with certan angles etc) ?
April 20, 2017 at 02:46
That's fair. a "thick" present feels in line with my feelings about this theme. I wonder though, if the present reaches a sufficient 'thickness' is 'p...
April 16, 2017 at 03:50
It's like music. The past is there as past, the future as future, the present as present. Both presentism and eternalism are fixated on the present. P...
April 15, 2017 at 05:17
If anything, things happen within rhythms, (which are nestled within bigger rhythms, which are nestled within bigger rhythms) - you have to understand...
April 15, 2017 at 04:46
so eternalism is straight up very bad at dealing with lived experience (which is a real thing, because you're doing it right now.) Presentism is dumb ...
April 15, 2017 at 04:44
Agreed
April 15, 2017 at 04:40
I don't have a horse in the presentism/eternalism race (I think they're both so stupid!) but I guess the obvious rejoinder would be that his decision ...
April 15, 2017 at 04:37
I'll provide a full response soon, but wanna note now that Mctaggart (from whom all this a series b series stuff derives) made it very clear that if t...
April 12, 2017 at 02:05
What do you mean by 'presence'?
April 11, 2017 at 23:50
@"noAxioms" Another way to look at this: I can say something like 'dodos once existed, but they don't any longer' 'But,' you would say, 'from a block-...
April 11, 2017 at 18:45
Right, and furthermore, any felicitous use of 'exist' will involve it being tensed in accordance to a reference point (a 'now'). From the reference po...
April 11, 2017 at 18:16
I agree with the criticism of the OP's letter, but do we agree with the spirit of the OP? Which I think is something like: 'To exist is to exist at a ...
April 11, 2017 at 16:46
I've always thought most of Hegel's pretty obvious once you get used to his prose. surprised to see him on your list - what seemed new to you? I think...
April 09, 2017 at 05:10
Have you ever encountered a thought or theory that didnt seem either stupid or else trite and obvious?
April 09, 2017 at 03:41
Ok, it may be envy, but It's just very surreal how many hard-won concepts are transparently obvious to you. Godel's theorems, Heisenbergian uncertaint...
April 09, 2017 at 02:10
Funnily enough, I read GEB in high school too (tho I was 17.) I liked it but I thought it was hard at that time. I guess I'm confused though, you said...
April 09, 2017 at 01:58
Trying to parse this. You were taught 'Godel's theories' at 15 in formal education setting? (what else would it mean to be 'granted' an 'good educatio...
April 09, 2017 at 01:25
tl:dr finite doesn't have to mean false & authentic doesn't have to mean infinite.
April 05, 2017 at 01:33
(forewarning: this is a rambly post) Yes, agreed. I've always struggled to understand the ethical import of the fact that we carve personas. Like, is ...
April 05, 2017 at 01:28
I think your diagnosis is exactly right, but that doesn't mean there's nothing of value in Marx (or Feuerbach, though I don't know with him. I never r...
April 04, 2017 at 20:02
Incidentally, I asked for The Essence of Christianity as a fuck-you-I'm-an-atheist xmas present in high school and my dad wrote on the inside front co...
April 04, 2017 at 02:03
I may have misframed you, but not quite as an angry young man (they talk more Schopenhauer, Zapffe & Cioran). You reminded me a bit of another poster ...
April 04, 2017 at 01:36
I like -and can relate to - a lot of what you've said but two quick things (1)It seems like 'dreaming of a better world' and 'dreaming of being the fo...
April 03, 2017 at 16:12
Don't forget how much the futurists (and other avant-gardists) loved italian fascism! Items 7-9 of the futurist manifesto:
April 02, 2017 at 21:58
Thanks for that breakdown, that makes a lot of sense. I suspected something like that, but you've spelled it out nicely. (re: the continental/analytic...
April 02, 2017 at 02:30
I'll check it out. I think I'm undergoing something like that kind of conversion myself right now, through Sellars. I've realized I've wasted a lot of...
April 02, 2017 at 02:07
I'm not familiar with either the literature on counterfactuals or Lewis, but I've heard the whispers, and isn't Lewis like the ne plus ultra of commit...
April 02, 2017 at 01:58
I want to be clear that I, personally, have very little knowledge of fascist-era Italy, but, according to Paxton, the answer is yes. All of which is t...
April 02, 2017 at 01:50
BUT: even though it's kind of operating on a general, law-type, level, the sentence, involving a particular individual, nevertheless IS true. That is,...
April 02, 2017 at 01:32
Also: part of the above is that it kind of uses particular individuals to illustrate general laws (i.e. if any individual a with power b does c, then ...
April 02, 2017 at 01:18
* hmm, I wasn't trying to suggest an actualist view. I think my intent may have been unclear because the example we were playing with (pierce, rock, g...
April 02, 2017 at 00:55
What about: "If Pierce had the power to see to it that the stone drops during a lecture, then, if Pierce had dropped the stone during a lecture, it wo...
April 01, 2017 at 22:11
Sure, but I also have a keen, personal, interest in people who argue in this way, because I've got a bit of that myself. It makes me want to stop and ...
March 29, 2017 at 14:59
I wasn't using "charity" in a moral sense, but in a argumentative-methodological sense. As in the "principle of charity." Both Pierre and apo engaged ...
March 29, 2017 at 14:09
That's fine but (1) neither pierrw nor apokrosis are anywhere close to being postmodernists (pierre's more in the analytic traditon and apo is peircei...
March 29, 2017 at 06:19
What do you find most irritating about the ways in which 'postmodernists' argue or discuss? Having witnessed your approach on this thread, I'm curious...
March 29, 2017 at 06:10
in short: the ideal state the fascists want only can exist as an mobilizing ideal. (so, yeah, a lot like permanent revolution.)
March 29, 2017 at 05:34
Yeah, that's legit. I was also very unclear in my post above, when I said Fascism wants to remain separate from the state despite being the state. It ...
March 29, 2017 at 05:29
Very interesting passage. But it does seem like a good opportunity to bring up one of Paxton's big talking points: the self-explanations offered by fa...
March 29, 2017 at 04:57
Having followed this thread from its inception, I think it's clear all he really wanted to do was take a potshot at POMO under the pretense that he wa...
March 29, 2017 at 04:46
I've been reading Paxton's Anatomy of Fascism with an old friend, largely in order to appraise contemporary sounds of alarm. I'm still less than halfw...
March 29, 2017 at 04:17
Obviously? Most scholars take Nazism to be an exemplary case of 'Fascism.' What do you mean when you say fascism?
March 29, 2017 at 03:55
Looked up the Latour essay that claim comes from...it's a little subtler than that allegation suggests, but not by much. It's pretty weak stuff.
March 28, 2017 at 00:01
What does reductionism have to do with the validity of DNA testing? What do you mean by 'reductionism'? Which 'postmodernists' do you think wouldn't a...
March 27, 2017 at 16:32
Foam (Spheres vol. 3) - Peter Sloterdijk Underworld - Don Delillo
March 27, 2017 at 16:22
Can you expand on that? I haven't encountered that argument before and it feels a little confusing prima facie
March 27, 2017 at 04:03
I stopped reading here, because here it became very clear you either haven't read Hume or you've utterly forgotten what you've read.
March 27, 2017 at 03:35
I like to think I have a non-kantian enough soul that I don't instinctively recoil from that kind of thing. But what's Hume's soul like? I think he's ...
March 27, 2017 at 03:30
I agree that he doesn't give a reasoned justification. But he does give a causal explanation which is presented as being true. People believe x becaus...
March 27, 2017 at 01:27
I think it would be fun to dig into Kant's second analogy (which, google has refreshed me, is where he deals with cause and effect most explicitly).
March 27, 2017 at 01:05