You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

praxis

Comments

So you're suggesting that critters have morals, @"S"? It's currently believed that the amygdala doesn't play the as big a role in human emotion as the...
May 01, 2019 at 00:53
In: Bannings  — view comment
If I recall correctly, he claimed to value love over truth (and reason?), so not a good fit for a philosophy forum.
April 30, 2019 at 19:07
Dog spelled backward is God, FYI.
April 30, 2019 at 18:03
Religion is hierarchical and only the top dog can be the master dog.
April 30, 2019 at 17:46
I’m sure that many feel or believe that the rules have something. Creativity can’t exist without a foundation or something to work with. As I tried to...
April 30, 2019 at 17:42
And whatever that is works for you??
April 30, 2019 at 07:22
Probably. Hopefully. Things like nature and civilization are both typically valued, for different reason. They are not “non-values” or “value-neutral....
April 30, 2019 at 03:57
You can’t ignore me, bi-otch.
April 30, 2019 at 03:30
In the sense that it was meant, yes, because I believe that modern society (myself included) is rather inauthentic in general.
April 30, 2019 at 02:46
Such as? Neutrons and electrons have existed for billions of years longer than tables and chairs, but not all neutrons and electrons result in tables ...
April 30, 2019 at 02:41
You mentioned being "creative and authentic" so I gave an example that addresses both. The person who started the topic referred to "genuine Being" in...
April 29, 2019 at 22:52
If someone adhered to specific rules, like painting by numbers or something, they would certainly not be creative. Can someone authentically enjoy pai...
April 29, 2019 at 22:20
Is that supposed to be impressive? Religion, or any particular religion, is not love. You value truth, as we all do, but you value the system of meani...
April 29, 2019 at 21:43
Really? I assumed it was because you were trying to using science to invalidate evolutionary psychology, and it would have been awkward, to say the le...
April 29, 2019 at 20:35
No, you began with claims about a specific science (neurobiology) and not science in general. People may not want to ignore you so much if you were mo...
April 29, 2019 at 20:10
It seems odd because you have it backwards, authenticity is the degree to which an individual's actions are congruent with their beliefs and desires, ...
April 29, 2019 at 19:15
And the truth is that God created us, etc.? What does science have to say about that?
April 29, 2019 at 17:25
I wouldn’t say “nonscientific disciplines,” whatever that is. I used the term “soft sciences.” The source of morals must include culture. Neurobiology...
April 29, 2019 at 16:12
You’ve made yourself the quintessential exemplar.
April 29, 2019 at 00:20
I don’t think it’s about flying cars either. What do they call it? Oh yes, an analogy. They’re sometimes used to help bridge gaps in understanding bet...
April 25, 2019 at 21:29
Am I a dualists? No. I wasn’t sure how serious a question that was and also didn’t want to lose track of the subject in a tangent, or at least an unin...
April 25, 2019 at 18:47
Recognizing the responsibly, sure. What do you mean an aesthetic assessment? Of course we can work to condition ourselves for various objectives but s...
April 25, 2019 at 18:38
If the goal is a demographic of one then political individualism or libertarianism would be a poor choice to start with because the value set it holds...
April 25, 2019 at 04:35
I believe the identity of political individualism is libertarianism.
April 25, 2019 at 03:35
Not a reading recommendation but in Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, Steven Pinker makes a good argument for p...
April 25, 2019 at 01:32
We can consciously endeavor to condition ourselves so that our responses or subconscious predictions are of a desirable quality. At least in that way ...
April 25, 2019 at 01:19
Hive-mind politics.
April 24, 2019 at 19:49
Obfuscation.
April 24, 2019 at 18:38
I’m wondering if you’re both amazed and fascinated by how much we've already discovered in the ‘soft’ sciences.
April 24, 2019 at 17:50
That’s a rather long way to get around the question. I think you know I was simply trying to identify an analog for morality in computers. Are you sug...
April 24, 2019 at 17:47
Because an inadequate identification would result in an inadequate explanation.
April 24, 2019 at 02:49
Both brains and computers process information. The processes that amount to computer networks of cooperative interaction occurs in computers, and only...
April 24, 2019 at 02:38
It cannot do this without some variety of order, similar to the way a computer is nonfunctional without software. If the source of how computers inter...
April 23, 2019 at 20:08
Emotions are for regulating energy expenditure appropriately to circumstances and are not all all redundant. They would be redundant if we didn’t have...
April 23, 2019 at 19:28
@"Wallows" I noticed the other day that Terrapin Station, who’s been active on the forum for three years and has 8.5k posts, has never started a discu...
April 23, 2019 at 17:27
Poor championless S.
April 23, 2019 at 03:59
I just read the alleged bump post and I have to agree with Wallows that it's a legitimate draft that could turn into an interesting and worthwhile top...
April 23, 2019 at 03:53
I'm not a scientist and strongly doubt such scientific studies exist. Also, I didn't claim that moral stances can't occur in brains. My turn. Is moral...
April 23, 2019 at 03:08
What you quote is my interpretation of S’s illustrious analogy and not something I would say, in case that isn’t clear. Anyway, I think it’s time to i...
April 23, 2019 at 01:27
It was just a side note, expressing a feeling and not an ontology. I would have preferred it if you had focused on the rest of the post.
April 22, 2019 at 23:07
I suggest hiring a hypnotist who could possibly make us believe that your point is worthwhile.
April 22, 2019 at 23:02
I meant to say that one and two are possibilities. Not to say that S’s thoughts are not magnificent.
April 22, 2019 at 22:44
There are two possibilities: 1) You don't understand what you're trying to convey well enough to communicate it succinctly. 2) You're unwilling to com...
April 22, 2019 at 22:13
Money talks because it's the one thing that practically everyone on the globe believes in. Some believe in angels and gods, and others don't. Some bel...
April 22, 2019 at 22:02
I was wondering why "The draft thread" was closed. Was it because of pirates?
April 22, 2019 at 21:54
I'll try to save Terrapin the bother. The source of morals cannot be found in human biology, therefore the belief that it can is rubbish. As I said, m...
April 22, 2019 at 21:12
And we know you don’t clarify because it would reveal the meagerness of your point.
April 22, 2019 at 18:27
I meant to write *concepts, btw. What I mean is that what you’re suggesting about learning concepts may not apply to how we order concepts. The order ...
April 22, 2019 at 18:23
There’s also (in addition to my previous comments about it) the relative value and narrative that order concept, such as liberty (high value for you) ...
April 22, 2019 at 15:28
If ‘cars’ are nature and ‘flying’ is nurture, I’ve been saying repeatedly from the beginning that both are necessary for a flying car. Car + flying = ...
April 22, 2019 at 01:22