You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Shawn

Comments

Is there any correlation between social spending and homogeneous societies?
December 12, 2017 at 01:57
Homogeneous societies and social welfare.
December 12, 2017 at 01:53
Do go on, please.
December 12, 2017 at 01:45
What does that even mean?
December 12, 2017 at 00:28
Thanks. That really seems to have answered the question.
December 11, 2017 at 21:26
Yeah, social spending and welfare seem to be linked together.
December 11, 2017 at 20:52
Well, Trump did sign a directive just today, now how much money is the real question though.
December 11, 2017 at 20:06
In: Feedback  — view comment
Aren't we taking things a little too seriously here?
December 11, 2017 at 13:46
Yes, so a wet fish is a senseless proposition, almost a trite tautological truism, and thinking it has meaning is nonsense. Is that right?
December 11, 2017 at 11:01
Not getting your drift. Enlighten me, as I seem unenlightened on the matter.
December 11, 2017 at 10:52
Isomorphic? Redundant? I don't entirely know. Is it reasonable to pull the rug upon which we stand? Regarding isomorphism, I don't really have a grasp...
December 11, 2017 at 10:44
I'm not sure. How can one fail language? I don't understand that concept. Hence proposition 7 in the TLP?
December 11, 2017 at 10:27
Yeah, so a fish being wet is a tautology. It's only when we treat it as if something that has meaningful content, that nonsense arises, no?
December 11, 2017 at 10:17
3.03 Thought can never be of anything illogical, since, if it were, we should have to think illogically. Wittgenstein, TLP
December 11, 2017 at 09:25
So, nonsense seems to be the issue here. As in, asking the fish how does the water feel? EDIT: I think I just Banno'd the Banno.
December 11, 2017 at 08:01
See the previous comment. Why has language bewitched us here?
December 11, 2017 at 07:55
Seems good to me. So, what's the issue with language that produces such befuddled statements, as I'm keenly interested in this state of affairs that c...
December 11, 2017 at 07:55
So, is this an issue of ambiguity or something more fundamental than that, as I feel we are digressing. Perhaps there is no solution, no?
December 11, 2017 at 07:45
So, a qualifier was needed for the ambiguous quality or property of being 'wet'?
December 11, 2017 at 07:28
Not necessarily in an informal language. If we want to remove the ambiguity then formalizing the property of being wet would seem of use or economy of...
December 11, 2017 at 07:12
No, it genuinely seems like a fallacy of composition... made apparent by ambiguity of the property of being 'wet'.
December 11, 2017 at 07:07
I feel as though language has failed us here, just not sure how.
December 11, 2017 at 06:57
So, doesn't that mean that someone who doesn't want to work is devoid of any desire to want anything material in the world? It would seem that that co...
December 10, 2017 at 21:32
Yeah; but, what if they hate their job and want to educate themselves or go back to college, or pursue areas of interest that don't entail an immediat...
December 10, 2017 at 21:18
Because it turns the subjective self on top of itself. Hehe.
December 09, 2017 at 12:43
Fichte and his transcendental idealism of the self hits me right in the feels.
December 09, 2017 at 10:32
So, are facts only exclusive to the correspondence theory of truth? I'm wondering.
December 09, 2017 at 08:05
So, what are facts in a coherentist view of meaning and truth?
December 09, 2017 at 04:35
Regarding that, has there been any progress between the coherentist view of truth and the correspondence theory? I'm on the fence.
December 09, 2017 at 02:30
I think, de gustibus non est disputandum, would be apropo here.
December 08, 2017 at 07:22
Well, I can see your opposition to the thread. It would in principle deny the actuality of entropofication of social institutions or civilizations as ...
December 08, 2017 at 04:57
I posted this same thread over at PhysicsForums too, and I'm kinda surprised the whole thread took that turn. Guess my English is really that bad as I...
December 08, 2017 at 04:13
I don't understand your prejudice about living on Mars. What's so wrong with that I wonder? Who's going to be exploiting whom on Mars or on the moon? ...
December 08, 2017 at 03:37
The cynicism is strong, here.
December 08, 2017 at 02:41
No comment. Yeah, and if everything comes down to a matter of what provides the most amount of utility to me, we would all be heroin addicts, yeah?
December 08, 2017 at 02:39
Yeah, so business as usual for the wolves that hide in sheep clothing under the guise of neo-liberalism. What else is new? Care to address the topic?
December 08, 2017 at 02:27
Yeah, I was referring to that report, but I edited my post because I couldn't find it.
December 07, 2017 at 20:53
Disregard
December 07, 2017 at 20:48
Are we at a dip? Usually, the logic is to sell when everyone else is buying and buy when everyone else is selling.
December 06, 2017 at 04:21
I also wanted to mention the similarity between religious leaders and philosophers. I often view clergy as one step ahead of the common philosopher in...
December 06, 2017 at 04:10
From what I understand, philosophy does not have a direct impact or immediate impact on the workings of a nation or state. However, philosophers have ...
December 06, 2017 at 04:04
I'm assuming that Trump is competent enough to realize that firing Mueller after Comey is suicide. But, the man is full of surprises. Let's see what h...
December 06, 2017 at 02:38
At least it was a good cause. Or not?
December 06, 2017 at 00:28
Ol' Freddy had issues. I don't think anyone scores higher on the OCD scale than that guy.
December 06, 2017 at 00:11
Find me a man that isn't obsessive about anything, and I will call him a Zarathustra.
December 05, 2017 at 23:59
You can see the notion being presented in this passage, or at least the sentiment to create institutions that are wholly owned or answerable to the pe...
December 05, 2017 at 23:31
Those are two different kinds of love, of course? Are you being facetious?
December 05, 2017 at 11:12
No secondary sources apart from Max Blacks interpretation of the TLP. Send me a link to what you have in mind and I'll give it a good reading. Thanks.
December 05, 2017 at 08:02
Little butthurt, lol! :P
December 05, 2017 at 07:58
If you could refer me to some other works, as the link seems more like handwaving than a serious philosophical critique of logical atomism.
December 05, 2017 at 07:19