You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleted User

Comments

Not so fast, bucko! So is your philosophy based on what is the most likely/logical argument, or the one most like NOT to be depressing to you. Me, I g...
October 06, 2022 at 10:49
Having said that - answer the rest of my post!! hahaha EDIT: I meant my other post, pardone.
October 06, 2022 at 09:20
Funny. And kudos to you for being so hard to pin down. I mean that sincerely - I wear my heart on my sleeve, which very often backfires on me.
October 06, 2022 at 09:18
. "I have a question for them, but also for everyone else here: Do you believe that we are just "chemistry"? If that is so, why don't they teach, in c...
October 06, 2022 at 09:14
I understand and respect those other opinions. But how then do holists avoid dualism? It's rather humbling and depressing when even our loftiest thoug...
October 06, 2022 at 08:40
everything you list could be made to SEEM to be in play, whilst still being a simulation.
October 06, 2022 at 00:13
you said “One thing though. SInce we are currently not progressing towards a better future (misuse of technology is destroying the biosphere which is ...
October 06, 2022 at 00:04
I did. Sorry about that.
October 05, 2022 at 19:43
So - you’ve picked two areas that are currently on the decline - the biosphere and social Inequality - and then suggest we need a post-scientific view...
October 05, 2022 at 19:40
could you define what you mean by post-scientific ideals?
October 05, 2022 at 19:27
Whatevs. Bedtime.
October 05, 2022 at 04:57
Oh please...
October 05, 2022 at 04:53
:smile:
October 05, 2022 at 00:16
I can’t find that quote, but his video on chemistry is called “the Hidden chemistry of everything” so that sums up his stance. Sure, we are a bag of c...
October 04, 2022 at 22:04
true dat
October 04, 2022 at 20:18
So we're just bags of chemistry? can you source this quote for me?
October 04, 2022 at 20:14
again with the science skepticism. My own attempts to discuss this have been basically dismissed, or just met with a shrug. But how important is this ...
October 04, 2022 at 20:08
Why is science not a "thing"? Of course it's a thing. It's a human activity, yes. It's as much a thing as philosophy or art is a thing. It's just the ...
September 26, 2022 at 20:12
No. Atheists have heard all the arguments, all their lives. They have no reason to believe there's a god without evidence, and yet no atheist says tha...
September 24, 2022 at 06:01
1) "Real" is a loaded term that usually is defined as anything that science says is real. Thanks for your response, sorry for the delay in mine. I'd l...
September 24, 2022 at 05:35
yes I think I got that quote from somewhere else. My apologies I know etymology is important to how we’ve developed our concept of nature and “physica...
September 21, 2022 at 20:36
perfect. I’ll read through that whole thread. Thanks. My first question is regarding your comment “There was an implicit conviction of a relationship ...
September 19, 2022 at 21:04
Is it really one or the other? How about: 3. Language needs improving?
September 19, 2022 at 09:10
absolutely and thanks for taking the time to discuss! Yes your argument was very interesting and I appreciate you’re taking the time to lay out the la...
September 18, 2022 at 19:23
I'm truly baffled by this reasoning, even though it's accepted in philosophical circles. I'm going to bed and would love to take this further - I ackn...
September 18, 2022 at 13:00
Ok I did and yes I understand. But I apply my same test - if there was such constantly divergent word meanings as this implies, it seems like discours...
September 18, 2022 at 09:58
How about if one person thinks W means "punch" while another thinks it means "apple." It would change the result of the second person asking for the f...
September 18, 2022 at 09:51
Unfortunately I have a rebuttal. I know I'm an amateur, but hear me out. Please rip me to shreds if (when?) you disagree. Could someone think grey, wh...
September 18, 2022 at 09:45
I can attest that that scenario gives me no comfort at all. Because my consciousness won't be part of it, and if go on to another form of life, I won'...
September 18, 2022 at 08:58
Agent Smith's definition of language skepticism makes it sound like it's a stronger beef with language. "....language is (too) flawed to perform the t...
September 18, 2022 at 08:47
interesting. Thanks. I should do some further reading.
September 16, 2022 at 20:13
gotcha
September 16, 2022 at 11:07
Is that along the lines of Wittgenstein writing (I believe) that philosophy's main role was to clear up language. Correct? I do understand that and ha...
September 16, 2022 at 05:56
I asked for a reading? I did google "language skepticism" and there were no specific categories for it.
September 16, 2022 at 05:22
was NOT expecting a Benjamin Franklin quote...well now I know you're not a Brit.
September 16, 2022 at 04:43
I'm confused by the term free determinism?
September 16, 2022 at 04:38
yup them doctors know a thang or two...they're BOOK-LEARNED! Hey of course scientists can be equally dismissive of philosophy. Equally wrong. Bringing...
September 16, 2022 at 04:34
I am talking to Joshs, but we're talking about science and not philosophy of language....ahem. And he had some trouble with language - which could be ...
September 16, 2022 at 04:26
ok.....it's not something I totally understand. Can you recommend a thinker...Frege? Wittgenstein? How does it apply to science specifically? And did ...
September 16, 2022 at 04:12
I feel like I’m in that Python sketch, “ I came here for an argument!!”:smile:
September 16, 2022 at 03:15
“You begin with an assumption about what science does: it tries to represent how things are in a world at least partially independent of our concepts ...
September 16, 2022 at 03:10
Not to be a Polyanna but this seems like a very limited and close-minded viewpoint. Do you not acknowledge the incredible stuff in neuroscience these ...
September 16, 2022 at 03:00
and in a sense you could argue philosophy has always tried to be science. I’m sure you know of the many example of philosophers who tried to make thei...
September 15, 2022 at 21:50
:smile:
September 15, 2022 at 21:35
“So the science we perform is influenced by the society in which it is done, for good and for bad.” As is philosophy, social sciences, psychology, pol...
September 15, 2022 at 21:23
“Science's ultimate goal is to figure out, as some say, the true nature of reality. However, it can't - its mainstay, hypotheses/theories, are only in...
September 15, 2022 at 21:21
That's not what she's saying. She's sayng the antivax movement is one visible aspect of the anti-science sentiment sweeping populist circles. She talk...
September 15, 2022 at 06:45
“Science is always undertaken from a definite point of view, a new book concedes. But it enlarges our knowledge of the world through the interplay of ...
September 15, 2022 at 05:02
BTW I feel like we’re talking past each other, not really engaging. Can you (or anyone here) take a quick look at this? It expresses my thoughts far b...
September 15, 2022 at 04:59
That’s how I interpreted it and how it was taught. That’s the party line. It seems simplistic and negates any possibility of science ever being open-m...
September 15, 2022 at 04:53