You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

baker

Comments

It'll be back online in a few minutes, don't worry.
October 18, 2021 at 22:14
So? I don't see the multitude of what is being put forward as the word of God or how to properly understand it as a deterrent from the principle that ...
October 18, 2021 at 22:10
There is a certain quality of one's mind, or spirit, which, at any given time, one either has or doesn't have, and which cannot be obtained overnight,...
October 18, 2021 at 21:53
So what are you really concerned about? The wellbeing of mankind? Or something more personal, such as are you afraid of being duped? Are you afraid of...
October 18, 2021 at 21:48
Knowing God through holy scriptures is a form of direct knowledge of God. Holy scriptures are a direct revelation from God, so when you read or hear t...
October 18, 2021 at 21:45
I direct you to ' post. And my own to another poster https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/608689
October 18, 2021 at 21:25
Some people here in Europe think that the US is pretty much the Dark Ages. This idea has been around for decades. Exactly. Can the US even produce a v...
October 18, 2021 at 21:23
But where did it fail? I can't think of any examples.
October 18, 2021 at 21:16
Donald Trump might now indeed be what you say. But he is a sign of something much bigger, much more powerful, more pervasive than any one single perso...
October 18, 2021 at 21:02
How ironic then that your Founding Fathers instated the Electoral College, precisely because they didn't have the faith that people should be "allowed...
October 18, 2021 at 20:44
And you're an American cowboy.
October 18, 2021 at 20:40
To the former -- probably not. The plebeian is just not fit to be a Stoic. To the latter -- yes. Normal middle-class people shudder at the mere though...
October 18, 2021 at 20:37
This really isn't rocket science. But yes, modern-day people tend to lack a sense of proper pride and dignity, so they can't relate to those who have ...
October 18, 2021 at 20:18
Mahayana emptiness is not the same as Theravada emptiness. Normally, when Buddhists talk of emptiness, they mean it in the Mahayana sense ("nothing ha...
October 18, 2021 at 20:09
I've been around Buddhism in one way or another for more than twenty years. I've studied some of the Pali Suttas, and I can find my way around Therava...
October 18, 2021 at 19:57
Did you not speak of pursuing other pleasures, apart from having children? Which is why antinatalism is so impotent. ha. Yes, character-types like the...
October 18, 2021 at 19:52
And you have not read the Catechism of the RCC, I presume? And look, even in the passage you quote, it is said first: "Hence the existence of God, in ...
October 18, 2021 at 19:47
Really? When, say, Evangelical Christians tell you who you really are, do you deem yourself as "knowing yourself better"? You didn't answer my questio...
October 18, 2021 at 19:34
Yes.
October 18, 2021 at 19:26
Sure, suffering is okay -- as long as it's not you who has to suffer.
October 18, 2021 at 19:25
No, "idk" is not good enough. In your scenario, everything hinges on where you place the beginning of life/personhood. Secondly, your scenario is part...
October 18, 2021 at 19:24
No. You must envision a proud and capable military general as an exemplary Stoic.
October 18, 2021 at 19:19
I'm pretty sure we've been over this at least once. E.g. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/543997
October 18, 2021 at 19:17
They don't. "Emptiness" is not part of Theravada doctrine. Individual Theravadins, even many of them, believe all kinds of things, such as lucky charm...
October 18, 2021 at 19:13
Here's a passage from a Turkish soap opera for you. You don't need to understand the language to understand the scene, a few pointers suffice. The con...
October 18, 2021 at 18:57
Here's a song for you.
October 18, 2021 at 18:47
You seem to be talking about grammatical aspect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect You seem to be talking about auxiliary verbs: https:...
October 17, 2021 at 18:30
Not everyone is like that; and not everyone who isn't in one or the other camp is a "fence sitter". But those who think in polarized, dichotomous term...
October 17, 2021 at 18:17
I have to admit I have to read most of your posts more than once, because I can't follow your train of thought. The topic of weakness is something I m...
October 17, 2021 at 18:07
I used to play some amateur soccer. I liked the dynamics of the game, the tactics, the precision. But I never could relate to other players' obsession...
October 17, 2021 at 16:44
Wow. Just wow. Jesus.
October 17, 2021 at 16:39
You speak like a right-winger. Formulating things in terms of winning and losing, while caring nothing about the problems at hand that politicians are...
October 17, 2021 at 16:34
Eh? Where is the "emotional maturity" of doing politics primarily or even solely on the level of whose will prevails??
October 17, 2021 at 16:32
Actually, not having a precise definition of "suffering" is part of the problem. Often, it's understood so broadly that it becomes a meaningless term....
October 17, 2021 at 16:04
In some ways, antinatalism is, basically, a stunted Buddhism, or even more a stunted Jainism. Both of these religions question the project of life its...
October 17, 2021 at 15:48
I've been waiting for you to mention Buddhism. The resemblance between AN and Buddhism is very limited and merely superficial. You formulate that idea...
October 17, 2021 at 15:33
You throw rocks at them, or shoot Hellfire missiles at them, whichever is more handy for you. Barring that, you leave their presence. You've got to hi...
October 17, 2021 at 15:21
Hence this should be the preferred method of philosophizing: https://tedhicksfilmetc.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/2001-ape-with-bone2.jpg?w=613
October 17, 2021 at 15:17
It depends on how it's formulated. "You're not making any sense!" vs. "I don't understand what you mean here. Could you explain it a bit more? What is...
October 17, 2021 at 15:14
That's not a Stoic stance, although it's a stoic one.
October 17, 2021 at 15:09
No, that should be: Living is taxing on the modern stoic's mind. The problem with so many modern-day stoics is that they are just that, stoics, with a...
October 17, 2021 at 15:07
1. They see no use in those ideas. 2. They see no use in the challenge. 3. They don't want to accept the challenge as proposed by a particular person ...
October 17, 2021 at 14:52
Then you shouldn't fret when Trump and co. win. Once you hold that what matters is whose will prevails, you can quit the pretense of being intelligent...
October 17, 2021 at 14:46
Sorry, but as always, you underestimate him and the support he has.
October 17, 2021 at 14:42
And let right-wingers win?
October 17, 2021 at 14:40
Oh god.
October 17, 2021 at 14:36
To unbalance a mind, it would first need to be balanced.
October 17, 2021 at 14:35
When do you believe that life/personhood starts? At conception, birth, 18 years of age ...? Suppose there would a Lebensborn kind of maternity camp fo...
October 16, 2021 at 13:19
The only person who benefits in any way from this is the antinatalist. Antinatalists are people who seek happiness in life from other people not being...
October 16, 2021 at 13:08
Nonsense isn't like weeds, so that once you pull or dig it out, it would be gone for a least a while. Nonsense is something far more systemic, complex...
October 16, 2021 at 13:05