You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Count Timothy von Icarus

Comments

There is the ens reale versus ens rationis distinction at the beginning. Roark takes it as analytic that something that really exists is "greater," "b...
February 02, 2025 at 12:44
I'd agree that Saussure's semiotics have not had a particularly helpful influence (in part because they led to Derrida :rofl: ). I was thinking more o...
January 31, 2025 at 23:34
Does it? It seems neutral to me. Consider a stop sign, traffic lights, etc. Many of the most obvious conventional signs are about processes or behavio...
January 31, 2025 at 23:21
It might be more that I have not properly communicated the claim properly. Pace Plato, Aristotle allows that weakness of will can occur, so he wouldn'...
January 31, 2025 at 22:41
Sure, you are correct. Provided that we accept that "it just is, for no reason at all," is as good an explanation of things as any other, this would i...
January 31, 2025 at 16:19
Arguments from brute facts in cosmology are almost always extremely ad hoc. Yours is no exception. "It just is, for no reason at all," could be applie...
January 31, 2025 at 16:02
Sure, I am pointing out that the conclusion can be given a different interpretation, and according to published responses to the article it may need t...
January 31, 2025 at 15:06
Arguably, the argument simply proves that the atheist cannot deny God (i.e. the being greater than which no being can be thought) without affirming a ...
January 31, 2025 at 02:07
Sure, but the rejection of particularly Christian revelation doesn't affect the ontological argument at all.
January 31, 2025 at 00:56
On the argument, there seems to be a few issues. The first is "greater than." A critic can equivocate on this and argue that it properly applies only ...
January 30, 2025 at 16:55
Where does Berkeley lay out an alternative theory of matter? I mostly recall him being fairly adamant about wholly eliminating matter ("immaterialism"...
January 29, 2025 at 03:34
Gaunilo of Marmoutier took this approach by positing an "island greater than which none can be conceived," in order to try to show that Anselm's argum...
January 29, 2025 at 03:06
Yes, I agree that you could render a proposition like that. However, Aristotle's point was about judgement. So if we judge Truman's hair to be "Truman...
January 29, 2025 at 01:06
I was actually thinking of that as I wrote that. Clear evidence that English is a barbarian tongue. :rofl:
January 29, 2025 at 00:55
:up: That makes sense. And it is very easy to equivocate in this way with some terms, "person" being a prime example.
January 29, 2025 at 00:54
Yes, we could arbitrary use the sound "dog." You could even use it to refer to something different in each instance. You could render "fixed by divine...
January 29, 2025 at 00:52
I would disagree. The way we talk about such things is not arbitrary. When we appeal to "our ways of talking about things," we just push the explanati...
January 29, 2025 at 00:10
"Blonde" and "black" are universals. If either we're unique terms that are only predicable of Truman's hair then they certainly couldn't fail to apply...
January 28, 2025 at 23:54
I'd say it does. If it didn't rely on this at all, then communicating with someone with whom you do not share a common language (a common set of pre-a...
January 28, 2025 at 22:31
However, if reference wasn't fixed by convention at all there would be no need for languages in the first place. The sound of "dog" could be arbitrari...
January 28, 2025 at 20:27
Yes, I think this is correct. It's similar to how the eliminitivist claims that when we claim that we are "conscious," "selves," or "taste, smell, hea...
January 28, 2025 at 20:12
R. Scott Bakker has a neat paper on this question. I rarely agree with Bakker on philosophy, but he is normally thought provoking A good question. If ...
January 28, 2025 at 18:36
What is "science proper?" To me, it's always seemed a bitter irony that just as there is an explosion in scientific progress (helping to drive the "Gr...
January 28, 2025 at 18:12
Ah, but when it comes to dealing with fascists, cannons have generally proved more effective than sticks of butter. The current far-right's obsession ...
January 28, 2025 at 17:14
Klima's target is how Anselm's ontological argument has been received and analyzed in contemporary thought, and he's referring to reference as it has ...
January 28, 2025 at 13:28
Maybe in some limited sense of "alive" as in necessarily mobile/mutable biological life. But per Book XII of the Metaphysics: Vaguely. Or there is a s...
January 27, 2025 at 16:40
A relevant, helpful article on some of the terms: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-terms/#Sign I might skip past the historical overview be...
January 27, 2025 at 03:57
There is a lot of strong support for the view that organisms and the ordered cosmos as a whole are most properly beings. However, this distinction res...
January 27, 2025 at 03:20
I think the critique simply misunderstands Berkeley, as does Johnson's reply. The argument from the stone isn't really an informal fallacy so much as ...
January 27, 2025 at 02:20
I'll just stick to the opening section for now. First, I will point out that the distinction between ens reale and ens rationis probably is more impor...
January 27, 2025 at 01:34
Perhaps. Robots might make better citizens. Unless you mean their inclusion? In which case, excluding qualia from your philosophy to "avoid problems" ...
January 26, 2025 at 01:41
Quine's thesis is not merely skeptical, that we "cannot be certain." It's that there is no reference going on. That's a big difference. But in any cas...
January 25, 2025 at 22:30
It seems to me that there is a more effective reductio pointing in the opposite direction. For what could be more obvious then that we do refer to thi...
January 25, 2025 at 20:46
The lable is very diffuse and is applied in different ways by different people. It tends to be self-consciously adopted most in continental philosophy...
January 25, 2025 at 14:34
There is an irony in the general analytic tendency to ignore medieval thought (continentals do too, but less). No other period reflects the rigor and ...
January 25, 2025 at 00:09
This is probably the Eleatics. The big dialectic that drives Plato's Parmenides is trying find a via media between the silence of a single, undifferen...
January 24, 2025 at 18:12
I suppose the question here is "what is the primary purpose of ethics?" In Plato, Aristotle's Ethics, St. Augustine, Boethius, St. Thomas, Dante, etc....
January 24, 2025 at 18:08
I long accepted the idea that morality should be about actions. I now think it's a poor assumption. Actions are not discrete wholes and their boundari...
January 24, 2025 at 16:19
They don't? This sounds like the anti-metaphysical movement redux. Unless the notion is that existence/being should just mean "every possible thing th...
January 24, 2025 at 13:13
You're backing the wrong horse then. This is our manifest destiny! /uploads/files/sc/4hapzf85nstcwt5a.jpg You are correct though, many of the executiv...
January 23, 2025 at 15:30
Yes, we have many different concepts surrounding existence. Ens vs esse, various uses of "is," "being is said many ways," ens rationis vs ens reale, e...
January 23, 2025 at 02:53
I think you are getting at something important, however I might quibble with the use of the term "essence" in these cases because it will lead to conf...
January 22, 2025 at 21:10
Sellar's myth of the given argument, even if one accepts it, respects epistemology. It doesn't imply that the existence of a rabbit as a whole/organis...
January 22, 2025 at 02:49
I have no idea how you came to this take. Essence has to do with what something is, it is not dependent on a human's understanding it. If it was, then...
January 21, 2025 at 21:33
And here is the objectional premise driving the slide to moral nihilism in much thought. "If something has to do with desirability or choiceworthyness...
January 21, 2025 at 17:39
Does the fact that a minority of people also reject that the Earth is round, the germ theory of disease, or that the Holocaust happened also demonstra...
January 21, 2025 at 17:33
I agree with Bob that you appear to be equivocating here, hence my confusion. Right, that's exactly what I mean by "arbitrary." Now, like I said, the ...
January 21, 2025 at 14:46
The description is relative to choices we make, not truth. No one says that the expression of truth isn't relative in this way, and people don't tend ...
January 21, 2025 at 12:40
Physics, not philosophy, suggests nothing is really true?
January 21, 2025 at 11:13
Not everyone. Some, certainly. Some (mis)readings of Wittgenstein, or other appeals to underdetermination, seem to result in very wild theses. Just fo...
January 21, 2025 at 02:08