To become enlightened was originally a quality of a few philosophers who saw that the truth about the world and ppl was diametrically opposed to what ...
@"john27" Would you agree that when you place your self-worth in things that can be taken away by fortune, you put it on shaky ground—whereas when you...
@"john27" What about the Olympic table-tennis player then? Do you really believe that if he were bereaved of his ability to play, his selfhood would b...
@"john27" I forgot to mention John, when we embarked on this discussion, one of the essential rules of dialectic: that you are to answer questions acc...
Therefore, when you said this, you said something false, didn’t you? Because you just agreed that it’s not our belief or opinion that establishes our ...
@"john27" So just because you can’t imagine yourself without your sight or hearing or whatever else the loss of which you think would end your selfhoo...
@"john27" And it is much easier on my brain to hear “easier” than “more easier”, but I’m just poking fun at you... Let me ask you this then: if you we...
@"john27" Would you agree that there is a general situation of a user and an instrument that he uses? For example, a cutter who uses a knife, or a sho...
@"john27" So do you recant your statement that it is your eyes that do the counting, and replace it now with the one that it is you that does the coun...
The whole notion of banning and censorship here evokes that imposed upon philosophers from the earliest times. The Enlightenment was nothing more than...
Are you saying that the expression of dogma and prejudice is not allowed in this forum? that if Zwingli had instead said, “I’m an unrepentant animal h...
That pretty much sums up what I’m saying. Philosophy is never welcome in any “house”, for houses always have rules, and philosophy is unfettered by ru...
In debating this most recent banning, this forum should consider what philosophy is, since this is a philosophy forum. One of the most salient charact...
@"john27" Neither have I, and I think I’m too old to ever dare do so—unless it were a party of octogenarian women who had been drinking heavily... ......
@"john27" Sorry, John: I am sloppy tonight. My belly is bloated with Thanksgiving dinner, and it oppresseth my mind. Let me ask my question again: wit...
@"john27" You are the most agreeable person I think I have ever met in this forum, John... ...but let me ask you this: do you believe that there are c...
@"john27" So, the mathematics that allows us to know that there is a center of the universe—would you agree that it is not a different mode of detecti...
@"john27" So for example, though it is scarcely conceivable that anyone could ever journey to the center of the earth, or even send a probe there, we ...
@"john27" By “”naturally” I suppose you mean directly by means of our unaided senses of sight and hearing etc., but I didn’t mean that when I said det...
@"john27" Then what is real exists and what exists is real. Can we go further and say that what exists and is real is detectable, and that what does n...
@"john27" Since you appear to assert that the dragon you imagine does not exist, and that its image in your mind does exist, are you willing to withdr...
Do you say then that the image of something is the same thing as what it is an image of? In your example, is the image of the dragon the same thing as...
@"john27" Would you agree that whatever is real exists, and that whatever is not real does not exist, and that, similarly, anything that exists is rea...
I agree. Having read your posts in this thread I can see that you are a materialist, and by that term I mean that you are are a reductionist: you want...
The “human shells” you speak of are our bodies, within which our souls abide, and it is the latter, not the former, that ethics or morality is concern...
I would say rather that the dead are unequal according to how they died. Would you equate the death of a citizen who died in a mudslide with one who d...
Comments