You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leghorn

Comments

@"john27" So what do we have that we can base our self-worth on that is immune to “the slings and arrows” of fortune?
December 11, 2021 at 07:52
To become enlightened was originally a quality of a few philosophers who saw that the truth about the world and ppl was diametrically opposed to what ...
December 10, 2021 at 01:04
@"john27" Would you agree that when you place your self-worth in things that can be taken away by fortune, you put it on shaky ground—whereas when you...
December 09, 2021 at 00:22
I think we just did, and I think you reversed your opinion: Is your “intuition” different from your opinion on this matter?
December 09, 2021 at 00:00
@"john27" What about the Olympic table-tennis player then? Do you really believe that if he were bereaved of his ability to play, his selfhood would b...
December 08, 2021 at 23:33
@"john27" I forgot to mention John, when we embarked on this discussion, one of the essential rules of dialectic: that you are to answer questions acc...
December 08, 2021 at 22:35
How about this parameter: one’s selfhood is not subject to chance or fortune or accident?
December 08, 2021 at 00:33
@"john27" Since you agree that we cannot subjectively determine our essential character, do think we might be able to do so objectively instead?
December 07, 2021 at 00:17
Therefore, when you said this, you said something false, didn’t you? Because you just agreed that it’s not our belief or opinion that establishes our ...
December 06, 2021 at 00:18
@"john27" So just because you can’t imagine yourself without your sight or hearing or whatever else the loss of which you think would end your selfhoo...
December 05, 2021 at 08:01
@"john27" Do you think that someone’s perception of himself and view of what attributes are essential to himself can sometimes be wrong?
December 05, 2021 at 01:19
@"john27" And it is much easier on my brain to hear “easier” than “more easier”, but I’m just poking fun at you... Let me ask you this then: if you we...
December 05, 2021 at 01:00
@"john27" So sight is essential to who you are but not hearing?
December 05, 2021 at 00:21
What if you lost your hearing? Would you no longer be you?
December 04, 2021 at 23:28
@"john27" If I may ask, how is your sight profoundly correlated to your character?
December 04, 2021 at 00:36
@"john27" So if you were to lose your sight, you would not be diminished in any way as to who you inherently are. Would you agree with that?
December 03, 2021 at 23:58
@"john27" Correction: “two”separate things.
December 03, 2021 at 00:49
@"john27" Would you also agree that the user and what he uses are to separate things?
December 03, 2021 at 00:48
@"john27" Would you agree that there is a general situation of a user and an instrument that he uses? For example, a cutter who uses a knife, or a sho...
December 03, 2021 at 00:13
@"john27" Would it be correct to say that your eyes are instruments that you use?
December 02, 2021 at 23:42
@"john27" So do you recant your statement that it is your eyes that do the counting, and replace it now with the one that it is you that does the coun...
December 02, 2021 at 23:33
I’m surprised you didn’t say, “No, it is my eye that counts two stars,” for you earlier said,
December 02, 2021 at 23:12
In: Bannings  — view comment
Absolute power corrupts absolutely...but amusingly.
December 02, 2021 at 01:25
In: Bannings  — view comment
The whole notion of banning and censorship here evokes that imposed upon philosophers from the earliest times. The Enlightenment was nothing more than...
December 01, 2021 at 23:48
In: Bannings  — view comment
No, but you can be Pilate...as long as you wash the blood off your hands.
December 01, 2021 at 22:02
In: Bannings  — view comment
Are you saying that the expression of dogma and prejudice is not allowed in this forum? that if Zwingli had instead said, “I’m an unrepentant animal h...
December 01, 2021 at 14:31
In: Bannings  — view comment
So the fact that philosophers and certain web-browsers are both unfettered by rules makes them equal?
December 01, 2021 at 01:30
In: Bannings  — view comment
That pretty much sums up what I’m saying. Philosophy is never welcome in any “house”, for houses always have rules, and philosophy is unfettered by ru...
December 01, 2021 at 01:18
In: Bannings  — view comment
In debating this most recent banning, this forum should consider what philosophy is, since this is a philosophy forum. One of the most salient charact...
December 01, 2021 at 00:54
@"john27" Neither have I, and I think I’m too old to ever dare do so—unless it were a party of octogenarian women who had been drinking heavily... ......
November 29, 2021 at 22:51
@"john27" Have you ever gone to a party entirely nude?
November 29, 2021 at 01:11
What about a blind man: is he unable to “perceive a set of things”?
November 27, 2021 at 23:42
@"john27" Of course! By means of the telescope. Now, let me ask you: by what instrument do we perceive two?
November 26, 2021 at 22:33
@"john27" Sorry, John: I am sloppy tonight. My belly is bloated with Thanksgiving dinner, and it oppresseth my mind. Let me ask my question again: wit...
November 25, 2021 at 22:33
@"john27" Sorry: I forgot to prompt you in the previous post.
November 25, 2021 at 22:19
And with what instrument do perceive celestial bodies too small to be seen by the unaided eye?
November 25, 2021 at 22:18
@"john27" Isn’t it by means of the microscope?
November 24, 2021 at 01:03
@"john27" With what tool do we perceive a microorganism?
November 24, 2021 at 00:35
@"john27" You are the most agreeable person I think I have ever met in this forum, John... ...but let me ask you this: do you believe that there are c...
November 23, 2021 at 01:23
@"john27" So, the mathematics that allows us to know that there is a center of the universe—would you agree that it is not a different mode of detecti...
November 23, 2021 at 00:45
@"john27" Would you say then that there is a means of detection that is different from the either aided or unaided sensory sort of detection?
November 23, 2021 at 00:06
@"john27" So for example, though it is scarcely conceivable that anyone could ever journey to the center of the earth, or even send a probe there, we ...
November 22, 2021 at 23:46
@"john27" By “”naturally” I suppose you mean directly by means of our unaided senses of sight and hearing etc., but I didn’t mean that when I said det...
November 22, 2021 at 23:33
@"john27" Then what is real exists and what exists is real. Can we go further and say that what exists and is real is detectable, and that what does n...
November 22, 2021 at 23:08
@"john27" Since you appear to assert that the dragon you imagine does not exist, and that its image in your mind does exist, are you willing to withdr...
November 22, 2021 at 22:38
Do you say then that the image of something is the same thing as what it is an image of? In your example, is the image of the dragon the same thing as...
November 21, 2021 at 22:14
@"john27" Would you agree that whatever is real exists, and that whatever is not real does not exist, and that, similarly, anything that exists is rea...
November 20, 2021 at 22:45
I agree. Having read your posts in this thread I can see that you are a materialist, and by that term I mean that you are are a reductionist: you want...
November 20, 2021 at 01:24
The “human shells” you speak of are our bodies, within which our souls abide, and it is the latter, not the former, that ethics or morality is concern...
November 19, 2021 at 02:00
I would say rather that the dead are unequal according to how they died. Would you equate the death of a citizen who died in a mudslide with one who d...
November 18, 2021 at 01:27