You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

I didn't say that. I have. Attend to them. So, you are claiming that one need not make a connection between a name and what's being named in order to ...
July 12, 2017 at 06:58
With certainty(conviction) comes "I know", and with less comes "I believe". Is that what you're getting at?
July 12, 2017 at 06:42
Certainty?
July 12, 2017 at 02:25
That is conflating true statements and what makes them so. I rest my case regarding that.
July 12, 2017 at 02:16
Earlier you mentioned the distinction between "I believe" and "I know"... I'd like for you to set that out for us. Would you?
July 11, 2017 at 21:20
I did not say that you said it. Notably, I'm showing you that you're conflating truth with either fact/reality or true statements. Neither is acceptab...
July 11, 2017 at 21:05
So a language independent truth is not equivalent to truth? The existence of dinosaurs is an example of a state of affairs/events/happenings/the way t...
July 11, 2017 at 19:49
To quite the contrary, if you know that you're looking at an apple, then you have already drawn a multitude of very complex correlations between 'obje...
July 11, 2017 at 19:36
So, truth is equivalent to historic states of affairs/happenings/events/they way things were? That would be to conflate truth and fact/reality. You mi...
July 11, 2017 at 19:06
Suspending one's judgment is a wise move when appropriate. Taking that to the extreme is unwise at best. Forming and holding true thought/belief does ...
July 11, 2017 at 09:46
Using "correspondence" works best. I am a correspondence theorist, just not one who mistakenly holds that thought/belief formation is existentially co...
July 11, 2017 at 06:54
Is the above true? Is the above true? Is the above true?
July 10, 2017 at 04:08
So then do you or do you not think that your beliefs are true? Do you or do you not think that your statements are statements and/or expressions of yo...
July 10, 2017 at 03:33
Your mistake is not realizing that statements are statements of thought/belief, assuming sincerity in speech.
July 10, 2017 at 03:31
I certainly believe what I write, Rich. Do you?
July 10, 2017 at 03:26
So Rich, do you have anything substantive to add to the conversation about truth, or are you here to put forth ad hominem aimed in my direction instea...
July 10, 2017 at 03:16
Acknowledgement of mistake is crucial for correction.
July 10, 2017 at 03:08
You're confusing your own imagination with reality my friend. I've never called my beliefs "truths".
July 10, 2017 at 02:58
I'm not. On that, my friend, you'll just have to trust me.
July 10, 2017 at 02:54
And yet if you believe what you write, then you must believe that I am unknowingly presenting my own personal belief as a truth.
July 10, 2017 at 02:52
So you believe that you know what's going on in my head better than I do?
July 10, 2017 at 02:41
Ah... Interesting. Going back to your earlier post, I took first notice of a previously unforeseen edit. Do you not believe what you write?
July 10, 2017 at 02:34
Indeed. Talking about what sorts of things can be true and what makes them so does make for an interesting discussion between those who claim to know ...
July 10, 2017 at 02:30
I would think that that's(conviction) exactly what anyone anytime making an assertion displays. Edited for clarity's sake alone.
July 10, 2017 at 02:27
I would readily agree with the bit about people calling their own strongly held belief "truth". Such folk are working from a very poor understanding o...
July 10, 2017 at 02:25
If some truth requires meaning and some meaning requires interpretation then.... 8-)
July 10, 2017 at 02:21
It seems to me that you're talking about conviction.
July 10, 2017 at 02:14
You changed the terms. I do not agree that truth is dependent upon meaning. Nor do I agree that meaning is dependent upon interpretation.
July 10, 2017 at 02:10
That is irrelevant. A=A is utterly meaningless in and of itself. Let A be "a belief".
July 10, 2017 at 02:04
Can you give an argument along those lines that you're ok with then? I was attempting to put your words into one, based upon how they were written.
July 10, 2017 at 02:02
"a belief is a belief" is meaningless.
July 10, 2017 at 01:59
Let's put this into argumentative form... p1. Being true requires being meaningful p2. Being meaningful is contingent upon interpretation C. Being tru...
July 10, 2017 at 01:56
Our debate was about your claim that the truth of a statement is dependent upon interpretation of that statement. I've since argued against that. If i...
July 10, 2017 at 01:45
The statement "The cat is on the mat" is true if and only if the cat is on the mat. The statement(within quotes) corresponds to fact/reality(is true) ...
July 10, 2017 at 01:39
Sigh... We are both, objects in the world and subjects taking an account of it and ourselves. The subjective/objective dichotomy adds nothing but unne...
July 10, 2017 at 01:30
On my view, correspondence isn't a metaphysical theory attempting to explain the correspondence of statements/sentences/propositions. Correspondence i...
July 10, 2017 at 00:14
This could be quite interesting. Seems that if we are to call something a "truth-maker", it would need to include everything it takes to make truth. I...
July 09, 2017 at 23:06
The statement is not true in one sense and false in another, because the truth of the statement is not dependent upon all interpretations thereof.
July 09, 2017 at 22:27
All misinterpretation is interpretation. The truth of "X" is not dependent upon misinterpretation. The truth of "X" is not dependent upon interpretati...
July 09, 2017 at 22:11
That does lead to a contradiction.
July 09, 2017 at 22:05
If the truth of a statement were dependent upon interpretation, then all statements would have precisely the same truth conditions as all of the inter...
July 09, 2017 at 22:04
Sigh... It is not the case that the truth of "X" is contingent upon misinterpretation.
July 09, 2017 at 22:02
Both have influenced my thinking... The problem, as I see it, begins showing itself by talking about what the two propositions "are related to", and i...
July 09, 2017 at 21:52
I think you've misunderstood. Contradiction most certainly arises in saying that the truth of a statement is dependent upon interpretation. If that we...
July 09, 2017 at 21:39
There are no such things as different interpretations in the same sense.
July 09, 2017 at 21:14
We were not discussing the truth conditions of an interpretation of "X". I was objecting to the notion that the truth of "X" was dependent upon the in...
July 09, 2017 at 21:05
I realize that the following quote was directed at Terrapin, however it is of interest to me as well... I'm curious about the framework being put to u...
July 09, 2017 at 21:00
It is as a direct result of Bernie Sanders' not being president, that the statement "Bernie Sanders is not the president of the United States" is true...
July 09, 2017 at 20:36
Thanks. There was only one statement:"Cat's fly". There were three interpretations. All were different. None were "Cat's fly". I would agree with the ...
July 09, 2017 at 20:34
Given what I know(or think I know) about correspondence theory, and most academic views regarding truth itself, I would say that that issue is commonl...
July 09, 2017 at 19:33