You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

Now you're lying Sand. You didn't say that until much later in an edit that happened long after this talk about insulting had already begun. I know wh...
August 06, 2017 at 22:36
What the hell are you talking about? I'm not complaining that you insulted me. Here's the thing though... If you think/believe that I insulted you by ...
August 06, 2017 at 22:08
Whether or not you were trying to insult me is another matter altogether. It seems that Augustino and I agree on that much(that that was your intent).
August 06, 2017 at 22:05
Nah. What you write irritates me. It reeks of insincerity.
August 06, 2017 at 22:01
Oh. So, what I wrote did insult you?
August 06, 2017 at 21:59
I do not think that what I said insulted you Sand... Am I wrong?
August 06, 2017 at 21:56
Other folk show a tendency towards ad homs... regardless of whether or not they are blatantly insulting another.
August 06, 2017 at 21:56
Some folk look for reasons to be insulted. Not much one can do about that.
August 06, 2017 at 21:54
Likewise, what good does it do to focus upon which politician is more trustworthy, when it is the case that politicians do not write the laws? There's...
August 06, 2017 at 21:50
This bears repeating.. What good does it do to replace politicians, if it is not the politicians who are writing and implementing the laws?
August 06, 2017 at 21:36
So, there's been a long standing history of politicians being less than honest in their motives. The government has legitimized their own bribery. Leg...
August 06, 2017 at 21:32
I will. Sit down and shut the fuck up. You're making yourself look bad. You confirmed everything I wrote, all the while denying it...
August 06, 2017 at 21:04
...
August 06, 2017 at 20:54
Here's something else worthy of consideration... Do the American people elect candidates based upon what the candidates themselves think/believe, or d...
August 06, 2017 at 20:50
Mull that one over for a bit...
August 06, 2017 at 20:26
What good does it do to replace each and every politician if it is the case that they do not write the legislation that they pass?
August 06, 2017 at 20:25
So if we put this into the appropriate context, the term post-truth began being bandied about during and especially right after a leader was elected d...
August 06, 2017 at 20:19
I expected that... X-) I tried to make it relevant.
August 06, 2017 at 20:16
Perhaps something can be gleaned if we focus upon what counts as an acceptable lie, if anything at all does. I mean, the current situation involves an...
August 06, 2017 at 19:35
Regarding Heiddy's notion of Truth... In a post truth world where truth is unconcealedness, that which is the case but has long since been hidden is n...
August 06, 2017 at 19:19
The following two claims are not the same... Anyone can look and see that for themselves.
August 06, 2017 at 18:54
In a post truth world where truth is unconcealedness, that which is the case but has long since been hidden is no longer hidden. The world after the u...
August 06, 2017 at 18:40
That's not what I wrote, nor does it follow from what I wrote.
August 06, 2017 at 18:35
It's not that I do not grasp what you're claiming Meta. Rather, it's that I do, and I know that it's wrong in several ways... First of all, the term "...
August 06, 2017 at 18:20
The Heidegger tangent is relevant due to Heiddy's use of the term "truth". In a post truth world where truth is unconcealedness, that which is the cas...
August 06, 2017 at 17:55
You're conflating our talk with what we're talking about. The world isn't existentially contingent upon the term "world"....
August 06, 2017 at 03:05
I think we both understand one another Banno. Our differences do not help the thread along, as far as I can see...
August 06, 2017 at 03:04
You're conflating reports of thought/belief with thought/belief(metacognition and cognition).
August 05, 2017 at 21:35
It requires drawing mental correlation(s) between 'objects' of physiological sensory perception and/or the agent's own mental state.
August 05, 2017 at 21:29
I'm not sure which argument about metacognition you're asking me to provide. There are many I employ, depending upon the context of the discussion. I'...
August 05, 2017 at 21:00
Same straw man, different post... Thinking/believing that something is there does not require thinking/believing that it is a "something".
August 05, 2017 at 20:40
One cannot understand rationality if one does not understand one's own thought/belief. That ought be of prime interest.
August 05, 2017 at 09:08
You changed the criterion regarding what counts as a bullshitter...
August 05, 2017 at 09:03
Mark remembers Bill getting out of a blue car. When asked to tell the truth about who got out of that car, there is only one acceptable criterion to j...
August 05, 2017 at 09:01
If the bullshitter's purpose is to deliberately cause people to believe something other than what happened, then the truth or falsehood of the stateme...
August 05, 2017 at 07:22
The Donald and the Clintons share that personality 'trait'.
August 05, 2017 at 07:17
Oh, wait... You're calling pure pragmatic folk "bullshitters"... In that sense, I agree. >:O
August 05, 2017 at 07:16
X-) All lies, including those of the bullshitter, are deliberate misrepresentations of what the speaker thinks/believes. Agree?
August 05, 2017 at 07:14
Hey Brian! Just to be clear. I was pointing out the consequence of a specific linguistic/conceptual framework(schema, if you prefer) that I do not agr...
August 05, 2017 at 07:02
On my view, you're reporting upon your own thought/belief, and identifying the content of the report on it's own terms, and then calling that the cont...
August 05, 2017 at 06:48
Lies can be true. That is because sincerity doesn't guarantee truth. When one is speaking sincerely, s/he believes what they say. Likewise, when someo...
August 05, 2017 at 06:19
Hey Banno! I think that what you're getting at here, given the context of 'post-truth', be best put a bit differently. Sharpened up a bit, as it were....
August 05, 2017 at 05:54
On page one the following was written... The above has all the different senses of "truth" as it's target, and then mistakenly implies that checking f...
August 05, 2017 at 05:33
What does perception consist in/of? That question requires a standard of measure; a criterion. What is the criterion, which when satisfied by X, count...
August 05, 2017 at 05:17
I realize that the following quote wasn't directed at me, but it is something I find quite interesting... Doesn't this imply that thought/belief is ex...
August 05, 2017 at 04:43
I would agree to this, generally speaking. However, if the osprey is capable of perception, which is presupposed by the last claim above, it leads one...
August 05, 2017 at 04:19
When we see something and identify it as a tree, we do not think/believe that it is called a tree until then. Thought/belief does not require identifi...
August 05, 2017 at 04:01
Nothing I said leads to what you're arguing against.
August 05, 2017 at 03:49
If reality is within us, and reality and interpretation are different aspects of reality, then reality and interpretation are within us, and yet other...
August 04, 2017 at 04:37
I hold that the complexity of one's thought/belief increases after language acquisition, and then again upon metacognition. The main difference betwee...
August 04, 2017 at 04:34