Hey Pneum! When you have time. Read the following carefully... It is where I'm at in all this. Still honing it. p3 needs left alone. It's not an argum...
Gettier's mistake is conflating knowledge of the rules of entailment/disjunction with belief. Believing that (g), (h), and (i) are entailed by (f) is ...
Indeed. Well put. That is precisely one point I've been making. Here's the thing... Gettier, and evidently many others want to say that Smith can get ...
When you have time. Read the following carefully... It is where I'm at in all this. Still honing it. p3 needs left alone. It's not an argument per se,...
When you have time. Read the following carefully... It is where I'm at in all this. Still honing it. p3 needs left alone. It's not an argument per se,...
It is worth noting that Michael's position necessarily presupposes that S's believing Q, when Q is a disjunction derived from believing P, not only do...
This is quite simply not true. We can clearly see for ourselves that Gettier attributes belief that p to Smith. The formula begins with S's believing ...
The whole of Western philosophy has gotten thought/belief wrong. The typical belief that approach doesn't draw and maintain the crucial distinction be...
Here's the underlying issue folks... Not all Q's are arrived at by virtue of one deduction. The astute reader will note that almost all of Michael's c...
Believing is obviously different than accepting. Offering Gettier the benefit of the doubt, we must assume that Gettier saw it that way as well, other...
By the way, creative does have a position regarding justification. However, I've found good reason to not let the notion get in the way. That's part o...
Gettier sets that out himself. So... What does that consist in/of? That's the question at hand. I say that it doesn't include believing Q. Gettier see...
I need not refute that. It's irrelevant p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) p3. ((p v q) is true if either (p) or (q) is true) C1. ((p v ...
I would concur. This is not always true. To be as precise as ordinary language allows:S must first arrive at a belief before we can say that S is just...
Fill it out with any and all disjunction deduced from belief that ((p) is true)... It's a proof, and you know it. Fill it out, or show what step is no...
When we're talking about thought/belief that is as complex as belief that:((p v q) follows from (p)), our account and/or report thereof had better wel...
Use a disjunction. In Case II, Q is a disjunction. Gettier claims that Smith believes that:((p v q) is true). Belief that:((p v q) is true) is the aim...
The Merrillian Lie-Trap p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) p3. ((p v q) is true if...(insert belief statement(s) regarding what makes th...
When we're talking about thought/belief that is as complex as belief that:((p v q) follows from (p)), our account and/or report thereof had better wel...
p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) p3. ((p v q) is true if...(insert belief statement(s) regarding what makes this particular disjunctio...
This is also not like Case II. With regard to my argument. I'm not ignoring it. I've rendered it inadequate. Belief that ((p v q) is true because (p))...
So earlier Michael presented a sample of an actual case of deducing (p v q) from p. 1. London is the capital city of England or pigs can fly 2. London...
An astute reader will take note of the fact that that solution further discriminates between knowing what truth conditions are for a disjunction and b...
This covers them all p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) p3. ((p v q) is true if...(insert belief statement(s) regarding what makes this ...
I would concur. This is not always true. To be as precise as ordinary language allows:S must first arrive at a belief before we can say that S is just...
Are you claiming that there is/are no other truth condition(s) and/or justificatory ground for your belief that John is a man? Can I get paid yet? Sta...
Follow Gettier's formula and stop just prior to the conclusion. You'll be at p2 Fill it out. p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) The abov...
Prior to language comes belief. Belief presupposes it's own truth. Therefore, truth begins in thought/belief formation that happens prior to language ...
I would concur. This is not always true. To be as precise as ordinary language allows:S must first arrive at a belief before we can say that S is just...
p1. ((p) is true) p2. ((p v q) follows from (p)) p3. ((p v q) is true if...(insert appropriate belief statement(s) about truth condition(s)) C1. ((p v...
Comments